KingSpeed
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 63,361
- Likes
- 22,535
- Points
- 113
Exactly0.7 left. not a buzzer beater
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly0.7 left. not a buzzer beater
Thanks@KingSpeed look at this
I really don't like it either. Dame drops off and chucks a long three at around 31-33 seconds and the other team gets this long rebound and stuffs it down the Blazers throats. Then the Blazers come right back up and try an ISO and miss when Dame is double or triple teamed.I remember Mike & Mike telling us (obviously a few years ago when they were still broadcasting), "33" is just the generic call for the 2 for 1. It's a signal for the Blazers to try and get a shot up at around 33 seconds left in the quarter so they can get at least 2 possessions.
looks like on a teleprompter someone is scrolling an OT discussion between barfo and maris
But by trapping or hedging, you're putting a defender in the ball handlers face off the screen, making the pass more difficult and affording extra time for help side to rotate, increasing the chance they can be of help. With hedging. The key is to stop dribble penetration and handoff the ball handler back to the original defender, and then to fill the passing lane rotating back into position, where the helpside hands off the rolling big back to his original defender.Trapping or getting closer to the level of the screen is letting the big get behind his defender. You're still having to rely on whoever the low man is to tag the roller who probably wont have the size to stop him from finishing, even if he gets there.
You're also leaving yourself vulnerable to open corner threes.
Yes, a more aggressive scheme limits dribble penetration, but your more likely to give up high value shots.
Ah gotcha. I guess I was was conflating it with a “game winner”.0.7 left. not a buzzer beater
best we can hope for is a 3-6 vs SA. Clips out of the picture for 6 after OKC won tonightThanks
The way the floor is spaced and the amount of skill on the floor in today's NBA makes it much harder to execute that scheme consistently and it's why you see it so rarely use compared to even 4-5 years ago. I also don't think we have personnel pull it off.But by trapping or hedging, you're putting a defender in the ball handlers face off the screen, making the pass more difficult and affording extra time for help side to rotate, increasing the chance they can be of help. With hedging. The key is to stop dribble penetration and handoff the ball handler back to the original defender, and then to fill the passing lane rotating back into position, where the helpside hands off the rolling big back to his original defender.
If done properly, the ball handler always has a defender in his face, theirs defense course enough to account for the roll man at all times and disrupt what would be a longer and more difficult lob, and there's no dribble penetration.
Much harder to lob against that then trailing the ball handler and letting him and the roll man to get downhill and making the dropping big try to guard both, or choose correctly.
With McGee, the Lakers had an extremely high chance of getting a great shot in the pick n roll all-season, and we didn't try anything else.
Just to add to this, we also don't rotate from the weak side to stop the lob either as we seem too worried about leaving a 3 point shooter. During GS's first title run it's something that really stood out to me was Bogut and Draymond were elite at simply being in the right spots almost every time. Bogut would rotate out on the pick and roll and there was Draymond in perfect position to guard against the lob. The rest of the defense was aware enough to recover quickly if the ball got swung to the opposite side too.But by trapping or hedging, you're putting a defender in the ball handlers face off the screen, making the pass more difficult and affording extra time for help side to rotate, increasing the chance they can be of help. With hedging. The key is to stop dribble penetration and handoff the ball handler back to the original defender, and then to fill the passing lane rotating back into position, where the helpside hands off the rolling big back to his original defender.
If done properly, the ball handler always has a defender in his face, theirs defense course enough to account for the roll man at all times and disrupt what would be a longer and more difficult lob, and there's no dribble penetration.
Much harder to lob against that then trailing the ball handler and letting him and the roll man to get downhill and making the dropping big try to guard both, or choose correctly.
With McGee, the Lakers had an extremely high chance of getting a great shot in the pick n roll all-season, and we didn't try anything else.
Two things to this...I understand the theory behind a hedge and recover scheme.
But the way the floor is spaced and the amount of skill on the floor in today's NBA makes it much harder to execute that consistently and why you see it so rarely use compared to even 4-5 years ago.
This is the best example I can give:
The Celtics from 2008-2012 where the leagues best defensive team over that stretch using a hedge and recover + aggressive help screen that you just described.
Fast forward to 2019 and you have the #1 defense Milwaukee Bucks using the most extreme version of drop coverage I've ever seen a team use and limiting shots at the rim at a historic rate.
This also after horribly under performing with Kidd who used an aggressive hedge and recover scheme.
Fair points.Two things to this...
1) My problem isn't that we don't have an aggressive hedge or that we use drop coverage, it's that we rarely mix it up or tweak it accordingly during the game. It's one thing if you're a great defense to use a particular style most of the time but in my opinion an average defensive team like the Blazers should be throwing multiple looks on their PnR coverage. I think it's tough to compensate for bad defenders when the other team knows what you will do every time.
2) The two teams you mentioned had/have two of the most amazingly unique athletes this game has seen. Garnett was a beast and was a perfect fit for an aggressive hedge defense. He also was a master at communicating the coverages like a QB out there. Giannis is just a freak. I've seen multiple times this year where he is out of position and his closing speed is just so unreal that he can get away with it. Their last game against Philly on one play he was somehow able to guard against both a lob inside and a kick out to a wide open 3 point shooter. It shouldn't even be possible, lol. Plus Middleton and Bledsoe (and Brogdon before getting injured) are all above average at navigating through picks.
We have so much to thank Magic Johnson for.
Thank you for destroying the Lakers, Magic.
Thought we had top 10 on both ends potential, putting us in the mix with those teams. Both Philly and Boston we're overrated coming into the year.52 Wins!!!!!!!
Who had us this year with more wins than teams like Boston, Philly, Utah, and OKC?
yeah...your guy Magic was getting roastedCan’t wait to read this thread! Plane taking off. I’m quite sure people were killing my boys during this one!
Tell the team to tank if OKC wins at Milwaukee please please pleaseDo whatever you have to do to avoid OKC.
Tell the team to tank if OKC wins at Milwaukee please please please
Yes. HCP is the Goat!Yeah, I'm sure if HCP tell them that they will listem
