God damn...... nobody was comparing them. I guess their is a difference of opinion when the term "franchise center" is used. Go back and read the whole thread.
OK, I did. Based on my reading of the thread, Sabonis was being compared with Walton, Bowie, and Oden as "injury-riddled franchise centers."
IMO, the term "franchise center" means: A "center" that could be the main piece of a championship team. And in this context, "injury-riddled franchise center" would mean: a center who--if not injured--could be the main piece of a championship team. Walton clearly fit the bill, Bowie allegedly did, and most believe Oden does as well.
I would agree with the majority here in suggesting that given his level of production in the 90's
with bad knees, Sabonis would have been on the level of late 90's Ewing, Mourning, and Robinson if he did not have his injury problems. I disagree with any suggestion that he actually produced like a franchise-level center, but I fully agree with the contention that he would have if healthy.
Another way to look at it--you didn't appear to dispute Bowie's inclusion in this discussion. But
comparing their production, Sabas was clearly the more productive player, despite being older and playing fewer games (and fewer minutes). If Bowie fits the description of an "injury-riddled franchise center", then Sabas definitely does too.