Gays used by Democrats once again

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Jon-Stewart-Thinks-Michele-Bachmanns-Husband-Gay.jpg
 
[video=youtube;T-w7QAEWudQ]

STOMP


Wow, I wasn't aware the argument from the Left was that bare as to engender that response. Ron Paul has it right. The government has no place in marriage nor can it discriminate. The joke is that Democrats claim to believe in equal rights, when all they're about these days is identity politics and then paying lip service. Pathetic.
 
Wow, I wasn't aware the argument from the Left was that bare as to engender that response. Ron Paul has it right. The government has no place in marriage nor can it discriminate. The joke is that Democrats claim to believe in equal rights, when all they're about these days is identity politics and then paying lip service. Pathetic.

lighten up Francis

STOMP
 
Wow, I wasn't aware the argument from the Left was that bare as to engender that response. Ron Paul has it right. The government has no place in marriage nor can it discriminate. The joke is that Democrats claim to believe in equal rights, when all they're about these days is identity politics and then paying lip service. Pathetic.

Yes because they are the ones making the argument that a marriage is between a man and a woman. They are also the ones going around the country seeking to actually put that into legal language as well. It's all Dems. Again projection from the right, as usual.
 
gay people vote democrat

homophobes vote republican

both parties are just pandering to their constituents
 
Yes because they are the ones making the argument that a marriage is between a man and a woman. They are also the ones going around the country seeking to actually put that into legal language as well. It's all Dems. Again projection from the right, as usual.

Like this Republican?

[video=youtube;rJhQBZ1La0w]

I love his separate but equal argument.
 
obama is clearly a self loathing closeted homosexual
 
Like this Republican?

[video=youtube;rJhQBZ1La0w]

I love his separate but equal argument.


He is basically Republican light IMO, he believes in spending, war, and is in the pocket of big business and the top 5%.
 
He is basically Republican light IMO, he believes in spending, war, and is in the pocket of big business and the top 5%.

Haha.

Ed O.
 
I'm sorry darling, but what is it you think you're doing right now?

Why I'm simply pointing out that any gay person that votes for a Democrat based on the hope they'll do something substantive on gay rights is fooling themselves. Clear enough, dear?
 
Why I'm simply pointing out that any gay person that votes for a Democrat based on the hope they'll do something substantive on gay rights is fooling themselves.

Perhaps Democrats "doing nothing substantial" is preferable to Republicans actively working against them.
 
Perhaps Democrats "doing nothing substantial" is preferable to Republicans actively working against them.

Some Republicans are anti-gay rights. Not all of them are. I know almost no one of my limited government ilk that don't believe gay people should have every single right that straight people do. My point is at least those Republicans are upfront about their position. The Democrats just pay lip service to the gay community. And gay people who actively support those candidates--like Obama--are just being used.
 
Some Republicans are anti-gay rights. Not all of them are.

And not all homosexual individuals vote Democrat. Most of the gay community seems to feel Republicans are worse for their cause than Democrats, and my opinion is that they're right. You can argue that Democrats really aren't great champions for the gay community and I'd agree...but Republicans (as a party, not every single individual) are worse. IMO.
 
And not all homosexual individuals vote Democrat. Most of the gay community seems to feel Republicans are worse for their cause than Democrats, and my opinion is that they're right. You can argue that Democrats really aren't great champions for the gay community and I'd agree...but Republicans (as a party, not every single individual) are worse. IMO.

You'll notice that the party suing the Government is the Log Cabin Republicans.
 
Why I'm simply pointing out that any gay person that votes for a Democrat based on the hope they'll do something substantive on gay rights is fooling themselves. Clear enough, dear?

So you're trying to use emotions to manipulate gay people into voting against Democrats. So, you're using gays. Once again.

Thank you for treating us like we're too dumb to see that.
 
So you're trying to use emotions to manipulate gay people into voting against Democrats. So, you're using gays. Once again.

Thank you for treating us like we're too dumb to see that.

Aw, sugarbritches, you missed the point. The last thing I was using was emotion. I was using reason and logic. Also, I'm not dumb enough to think all gay people vote or think the same, but you keep on truckin'.
 
Some Republicans are anti-gay rights. Not all of them are. My point is at least those Republicans are upfront about their position.

Yes, clearly one should prefer the lynch mob to the moderately-well-meaning-but-afraid-to-get-involved bystanders, if one happens to be black. Because, after all, the lynch mob is upfront about their position.

barfo
 
Aw, sugarbritches, you missed the point. The last thing I was using was emotion. I was using reason and logic. Also, I'm not dumb enough to think all gay people vote or think the same, but you keep on truckin'.

No, but you are dumb enough to use this tactic multiple times. Like that thread where you and some others tried to get gays to focus on the POC voters in California who voted against gay marriage. Or that thread where you tried to tell us gays that Obama has done nothing for our kind (I understand maybe you think using Dan Savage logic will work, but not all gays will ignore how Obama has done more than any other sitting President for queer federal employees or the transgender community - which Savage and many others in and outside the community like to throw under the bus so they may convince the privileged hey, we deserve to be privileged too HAHA LOOK WE THREW THE TRANSGENDERS UNDER THE BUS).

And thank you for saying you're using logic and reason, you're so kind, the great privileged one, to show us little non-logical gays the true way. We can't be logical on our own, it's far too complex for us.

As if those of us who vote democratic do so because "OH MY LAWD AND SAVIOR NEIL PATRICK HARRIS, I bet if we vote for this democratic nominee they will just always stick to their word on gay marriage, or gay rights, or any gay matter. They will not, like most other politicians before them, bow down to the discriminatory masses of the United States of America to ensure they do not alienate any future voters."

No. If you think gay people go in voting for a democratic nominee with that as their logic, or their primary concern, then this post is even more insulting. I don't recall you ever making a post here titled "Homophobic bigots used by Republicans once again" for our resident homophobes like *Deleted*. Then again, I mean, you have our well-meaning in mind, right? You're just trying to explain the idea of political nominees making promises to people and then breaking them as if this is some new and complex political process. I mean, it's in a long line of defending and watching out for the gays ideology you've exhibited here.

Like that time when *Deleted* suggested all gay men and transgenders were pedophiles, a thread you participated in. ..oh, wait. No, you didn't. In fact, for as much as you want to make this thread look like you're looking out for gay people, pointing out how the mean democrats are using us and well, at least the republicans are honest that they want you to burn in hell.. you never do much to speak against the actual homophobes on this board.

But thank you for teaching us about logic and reason in voting. You knew we were far too busy thinking about fashion than silly politics that help shape our quality of life. So kind!

Gotta run now, absolutely fabulous special on Elton John coming up. He's got an outfit that is to DIE FOR, girl!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, but you are dumb enough to use this tactic multiple times. Like that thread where you and some others tried to get gays to focus on the POC voters in California who voted against gay marriage. Or that thread where you tried to tell us gays that Obama has done nothing for our kind (I understand maybe you think using Dan Savage logic will work, but not all gays will ignore how Obama has done more than any other sitting President for queer federal employees or the transgender community - which Savage and many others in and outside the community like to throw under the bus so they may convince the privileged hey, we deserve to be privileged too HAHA LOOK WE THREW THE TRANSGENDERS UNDER THE BUS).

And thank you for saying you're using logic and reason, you're so kind, the great privileged one, to show us little non-logical gays the true way. We can't be logical on our own, it's far too complex for us.

As if those of us who vote democratic do so because "OH MY LAWD AND SAVIOR NEIL PATRICK HARRIS, I bet if we vote for this democratic nominee they will just always stick to their word on gay marriage, or gay rights, or any gay matter. They will not, like most other politicians before them, bow down to the discriminatory masses of the United States of America to ensure they do not alienate any future voters."

No. If you think gay people go in voting for a democratic nominee with that as their logic, or their primary concern, then this post is even more insulting. I don't recall you ever making a post here titled "Homophobic bigots used by Republicans once again" for our resident homophobes like *Deleted*. Then again, I mean, you have our well-meaning in mind, right? You're just trying to explain the idea of political nominees making promises to people and then breaking them as if this is some new and complex political process. I mean, it's in a long line of defending and watching out for the gays ideology you've exhibited here.

Like that time when *Deleted* suggested all gay men and transgenders were pedophiles, a thread you participated in. ..oh, wait. No, you didn't. In fact, for as much as you want to make this thread look like you're looking out for gay people, pointing out how the mean democrats are using us and well, at least the republicans are honest that they want you to burn in hell.. you never do much to speak against the actual homophobes on this board.

But thank you for teaching us about logic and reason in voting. You knew we were far too busy thinking about fashion than silly politics that help shape our quality of life. So kind!

Gotta run now, absolutely fabulous special on Elton John coming up. He's got an outfit that is to DIE FOR, girl!

I edited out a certain person's name that you had included in your post but besides that, wow what a post! Nice job! Rep'd!
 
You can argue that Democrats really aren't great champions for the gay community and I'd agree...but Republicans (as a party, not every single individual) are worse. IMO.

Exactly. That is why I have to vote Democrat. Even if Obama sucks when it comes to gay rights, Michelle Bachmann would be worse. Far worse. I wanted Hilary anyway. Can't always get who you want.
 
No, but you are dumb enough to use this tactic multiple times. Like that thread where you and some others tried to get gays to focus on the POC voters in California who voted against gay marriage. Or that thread where you tried to tell us gays that Obama has done nothing for our kind (I understand maybe you think using Dan Savage logic will work, but not all gays will ignore how Obama has done more than any other sitting President for queer federal employees or the transgender community - which Savage and many others in and outside the community like to throw under the bus so they may convince the privileged hey, we deserve to be privileged too HAHA LOOK WE THREW THE TRANSGENDERS UNDER THE BUS).

And thank you for saying you're using logic and reason, you're so kind, the great privileged one, to show us little non-logical gays the true way. We can't be logical on our own, it's far too complex for us.

As if those of us who vote democratic do so because "OH MY LAWD AND SAVIOR NEIL PATRICK HARRIS, I bet if we vote for this democratic nominee they will just always stick to their word on gay marriage, or gay rights, or any gay matter. They will not, like most other politicians before them, bow down to the discriminatory masses of the United States of America to ensure they do not alienate any future voters."

No. If you think gay people go in voting for a democratic nominee with that as their logic, or their primary concern, then this post is even more insulting. I don't recall you ever making a post here titled "Homophobic bigots used by Republicans once again"

ding ding ding ding!!! Republicans have been using homophobia to win elections for the last 10 years. It's how Bush won in 2004.
 
Wait, when did teh gheys get the vote?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top