Globabl warming still isn't real, right?!?!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Lol

Pictures of Greenland taken in the 1930s just found. They show less glacier then than now. Go figure.
 
Lol

Pictures of Greenland taken in the 1930s just found. They show less glacier then than now. Go figure.

Oh well if the glaciers in Greenland have grown, I'm sure the temperatures in the US will go lower somehow. I'm at ease for our agricultural society. Thanks Denny, your words solved the problem.
 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/02/1930s_greenland_glacier_retreat/

1930s photos show Greenland glaciers retreating faster than today

But nobody thought it was a big deal

Recently unearthed photographs taken by Danish explorers in the 1930s show glaciers in Greenland retreating faster than they are today, according to researchers.

The photos in question were taken by the seventh Thule Expedition to Greenland led by Dr Knud Rasmussen in 1932. The explorers were equipped with a seaplane, which they used to take aerial snaps of glaciers along the Arctic island's coasts.

After the expedition returned the photographs were used to make maps and charts of the area, then placed in archives in Denmark where they lay forgotten for decades. Then, in recent years, international researchers trying to find information on the history of the Greenland glaciers stumbled across them.

Taken together the pictures show clearly that glaciers in the region were melting even faster in the 1930s than they are today, according to Professor Jason Box, who works at the Byrd Polar Research Center at Ohio State uni.
 
You are confusing weather with global warming. And your evidence is anecdotal more than scientific anyway.
 
reminder: if man wasn't here on earth, the temperature of every part of the earth will remain constant forever with no variation.
 
US = "global"

Hmm...

Sorry, I thought you guys were such america first thinkers, that I didn't need to expand the data set. Here you go, oh snide one.

link
St. Petersburg, Russia, has tallied 8.6 C, or 15.4 F, above normal. In Germany, Hannover has sweltered at 7.4 C above normal.
 
Eur_tanom_feb2012_lrg.jpg
 
http://www.climatewatch.noaa.gov/im...entral-asia-winter-plays-catch-up-in-february

For Europe, the first two calendar months of winter were mild. In December and most of January, temperatures averaged several degrees warmer than normal. As if to make up for lost time, however, exceptionally cold weather arrived in late January and remained firmly entrenched for weeks, causing many deaths as well as transportation chaos, according to news reports.

The map above shows the extent and intensity of the cold snap across Europe and central Asia in February 2012. (Map includes data through February 25.) Places where temperatures were up to 16 degrees Fahrenheit colder than normal are deep blue, while places that were up to 16 degrees F warmer than normal are deep red. The “normal” February temperatures are based on data from 1981-2010.

In Europe, the most unusually cold temperatures settled over the East, especially Belarus and Ukraine, with an additional strong cold spot over southern France. Farther east, the cold anomalies were even more intense over Kazakhstan, and to its south, (not labeled) Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. Colder than normal temperatures extend across Asia and even down into North Africa.

Several natural climate patterns can influence winter weather in the Northern Hemisphere. Among the strongest influences on European winters is the Arctic Oscillation. Winters are often milder than normal when the Arctic Oscillation is in its positive phase and cooler than normal when the pattern is in its negative phase.

The Arctic Oscillation flip-flopped twice so far this winter. The pattern was in its positive phase through mid-January, favoring mild conditions, and in its negative phase for the next several weeks, contributing to the chilly conditions in Europe. In mid-February, the Arctic Oscillation flipped back to its positive phase. While the cold conditions across Europe began to lose their grip later in the month, the Arctic blast certainly left its fingerprint on the monthly average temperature anomalies.

The cold in central Asia was matched by unusual warmth in the Kara and Barents Seas of the Arctic, likely connected to strong, steady winds from the south and west that have pushed sea ice deeper into the Arctic, leaving more open water than usual. Whatever warmth southerly winds might have brought, the lack of ice itself is probably contributing to the much warmer than normal temperatures. Sea ice insulates the ocean, preventing heat from the ocean from being lost to the air.
 
according to the map, apparently it is blisteringly hot at the north pole? that cant be good
 
according to the map, apparently it is blisteringly hot at the north pole? that cant be good

According to the map, it was 16 degrees warmer than "normal" (which isn't actually normal at all). Looks like over Scandinavia to me. So their Feb. temperature may have been -16 degrees F instead of -32.

But hey, if westnob lived in Belarus, he's have started a thread about global cooling.
 
You are confusing weather with global warming. And your evidence is anecdotal more than scientific anyway.

The concise answer for those of us who are pro-science to use every time against those of you who want to politicize science.
 
The concise answer for those of us who are pro-science to use every time against those of you who want to politicize science.

Actually, the concise answer of scientists. Don't confuse weather with warming, so they say. Then there are those who claimed hurricanes would be more severe, etc., and AlGore had to remove that slide from his powerpoint.
 
All I know is that it used to snow 4 times each winter in the 70s and 80s, and for the last 5 years it's come down to 2 and now 1 time, and for shorter durations.

And I used to wear a sweatshirt all summer and for the last few years I've had to go with short sleeve t-shirts.
 
That's in the same city. As for your answer being the usual pro-science criticism of your side, I know, that was my point.
 
Ive probably asked this before but won't adding more water (from the ice caps) to the oceans actually cause a temporary "little ice age" like the one that happened about 300 years ago?

slowing down the President Van Buren belt or something.
 
What happened over a 2 decade period, WEATHER-wise, is anecdotal and meaningless. Except that these days you have nicer weather.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top