Pinwheel1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 23,427
- Likes
- 15,996
- Points
- 113
http://hoopshype.com/2015/07/26/the-rookie-extension-impact-for-2016/
Maybe Barnes could be available........
Maybe Barnes could be available........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep! It would be a Harrison "Fucking" MistakeAnyone who gives Harrison Barnes max money just doesn't care about money.
Anyone who gives Harrison Barnes max money just doesn't care about money.

I was a big time Horford fan boy but I think that shipped sailed. He's a bit of an overlap and his age doesn't warrant the move. If we are gonna get someone a bit older, it's gotta be something like Durant or "take over" caliber. Horford is damn good, but not a difference maker IMO. Kinda like AldridgeIIRC, Hoford and Noah will both be FA next summer.
Anyone who gives Harrison Barnes max money just doesn't care about money.
http://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents/2016/Who are the scrubs of next year's FA period. The ones we might have a shot at?
Horford is an option if we acquire another all star like Cousins. He'd be that borderline 3rd star we never had in the 'Marsha "era". Getting Horford along with an all star could allow you to trade a couple young bigs and picks for a borderline allstar wing. A Derozen type.I was a big time Horford fan boy but I think that shipped sailed. He's a bit of an overlap and his age doesn't warrant the move. If we are gonna get someone a bit older, it's gotta be something like Durant or "take over" caliber. Horford is damn good, but not a difference maker IMO. Kinda like Aldridge
Wrong, LMA is the one who stated he wanted out rather than go through another rebuild. So we had to think like that to try and keep him.So now we have a two year window on the rebuild because of Lillard's age? Guys. It's thinking like that lost us LMA. We might not make the playoffs for five years.
Exactly this.Horford is an option if we acquire another all star like Cousins. He'd be that borderline 3rd star we never had in the 'Marsha "era". Getting Horford along with an all star could allow you to trade a couple young bigs and picks for a borderline allstar wing. A Derozen type.
Derozen will probably opt out though, and Chandler Parsons could opt out as well.
So now we have a two year window on the rebuild because of Lillard's age? Guys. It's thinking like that lost us LMA. We might not make the playoffs for five years.
Horford is an option if we acquire another all star like Cousins. He'd be that borderline 3rd star we never had in the 'Marsha "era". Getting Horford along with an all star could allow you to trade a couple young bigs and picks for a borderline allstar wing. A Derozen type.
Derozen will probably opt out though, and Chandler Parsons could opt out as well.
Yeah. Sadly, that has been at the back of my mind too. If the Blazers can't trade for a disgruntled All Star or sign a free - sorry can't actually finish that sentence - they may have to go full implosion. Wouldn't be fair to Dame in the long run, anyway.Lillard will start to decline athletically in a couple years. If the Blazers are 5 years away from finishing a rebuild we may be better off trading Damian. I bet he could fetch next years #1 pick, who would be 19 which is 7 years younger; plus a second great young prospect. Its basically the spot we were in back in 2011 with LaMarcus. Back then Wes and Batum became above average starters plus we drafted Lillard so it was worth taking a shot at contending. If we don't hit multiple players like that in the next year or two it will be time to consider trading Lillard while he is fully in his prime.
Ehhh, I don't think he was. He was a good starter but not quite a borderline star. Horford was an all star just last year.Wes was the 3rd borderline allstar. But I agree with the rest.
If he had been playing in the NBA since he was 19 I might agree with that, but to say he'll decline athletically at age 27 after only 5 years in the league is wrong, especially since he takes care of himself.Lillard will start to decline athletically in a couple years. If the Blazers are 5 years away from finishing a rebuild we may be better off trading Damian. I bet he could fetch next years #1 pick, who would be 19 which is 7 years younger; plus a second great young prospect. Its basically the spot we were in back in 2011 with LaMarcus. Back then Wes and Batum became above average starters plus we drafted Lillard so it was worth taking a shot at contending. If we don't hit multiple players like that in the next year or two it will be time to consider trading Lillard while he is fully in his prime.
Oh fucking Christ. So now I get to hear about how we should deal lillard for the next few years? Good god.
