hoopsjock
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2018
- Messages
- 16,302
- Likes
- 26,283
- Points
- 113
But my point was that at this point in his career (2 years) Giannis wasn't anything significant either so why does Zach's trade value in year 2 matter compared to someone who was ready to play immediately? In the end if Zach turns out better than Mitchell what is more important: trade value 2 years in or total career?Sorry but no. As I closed in the post you're responding to, Mitchell is only one of the extremely arguable examples of misses in the draft by NO besides Biggie. Though I've my favorites to root for, I also view all the players as tradable commodities. Hopefully ZC will continue to trend up and become the next great Blazer 4/5 alla Sheed & LA, hell hopefully he'll be able to dunk from the 3 point line too, but right now I'm pretty sure that Mitchell would be worth far more on the trade market then Zach. Do you really disagree?
STOMP
It's not always clear that the best player is both the right fit and would've been the same in a different system.


