Politics Grand jury subpoenas issued in FBI's Russia investigation

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
126,713
Likes
147,312
Points
115
Federal prosecutors have issued grand jury subpoenas to associates of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn seeking business records, as part of the ongoing probe of Russian meddling in last year's election, according to people familiar with the matter.

...

The subpoenas represent the first sign of a significant escalation of activity in the FBI's broader investigation begun last July into possible ties between Trump campaign associates and Russia.
The subpoenas issued in recent weeks by the US Attorney's Office in Alexandria, Virginia, were received by associates who worked with Flynn on contracts after he was forced out as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014, according to the people familiar with the investigation.

Robert Kelner, an attorney for Flynn, declined to comment. The US Attorney's Office in Alexandria, the Justice Department and the FBI also declined to comment.

...

Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, emerged in 2015 as a strident critic of the Obama administration, which fired him. He built a close relationship last year with then-candidate Trump and became a frequent Trump campaign surrogate before assuming a brief tenure as national security advisor.+

US Attorney Dana Boente, whose office issued the subpoenas, is also leading the investigation into WikiLeaks and the effort to bring possible charges against the group's founder, Julian Assange. Boente is also acting as head of the Justice Department's national security section.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/09/politics/grand-jury-fbi-russia/index.html
 
Senate Russia investigators ask Treasury for Trump team financial information

Senate Russia investigators have sent a request to the Treasury Department's criminal investigation division for any information related to President Donald Trump, his top officials and his campaign aides, the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee told CNN Tuesday.

"We've made a request, to FinCEN in the Treasury Department, to make sure, not just for example vis-a-vis the President, but just overall our effort to try to follow the intel no matter where it leads," Sen. Mark Warner told CNN. "You get materials that show if there have been, what level of financial ties between, I mean some of the stuff, some of the Trump-related officials, Trump campaign-related officials and other officials and where those dollars flow -- not necessarily from Russia."

FinCEN is the federal agency that has been investigating allegations of foreign money-laundering through purchases of US real estate.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/09/politics/senate-russia-investigation-donald-trump/index.html
 
"We've made a request, to FinCEN in the Treasury Department, to make sure, not just for example vis-a-vis the President, but just overall our effort to try to follow the intel no matter where it leads," Sen. Mark Warner told CNN. "You get materials that show if there have been, what level of financial ties between, I mean some of the stuff, some of the Trump-related officials, Trump campaign-related officials and other officials and where those dollars flow -- not necessarily from Russia."

So basically, he has no idea what the hell he's doing. What a surprise.

No wonder our government is so dysfunctional.
 
So basically, he has no idea what the hell he's doing. What a surprise.

No wonder our government is so dysfunctional.

The phrase that jumps out at me is "if there have been" with "if" indicating they have no evidence there has been. Fishing expedition.

"We've made a request, to FinCEN in the Treasury Department, to make sure, not just for example vis-a-vis the President, but just overall our effort to try to follow the intel no matter where it leads," Sen. Mark Warner told CNN. "You get materials that show if there have been, what level of financial ties between, I mean some of the stuff, some of the Trump-related officials, Trump campaign-related officials and other officials and where those dollars flow -- not necessarily from Russia."
 
Well, obviously, Denny, you don't investigate something you already have proof of; you investigate when there is indication to find out IF it happened.

Actually you do investigate things you have proof of, especially when there's zero indication that something dreamed up may have happened.

Adam Schiff is as partisan and biased a democrat as you can find.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...ive_proof_of_any_trump-russia_connection.html

Adam Schiff: There Is No "Definitive" Proof Of Any Trump-Russia Connection

On Sunday's edition of 'State of the Union' on CNN, House Intelligence Committee top Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) explained that so far his investigation has turned up no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion in the 2016 election.​

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/04/d...een-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion-video/

Dianne Feinstein Says She Has Not Seen Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion [VIDEO]

A top Democratic member of the Senate Intelligence Committee says she has yet to see evidence of collusion between Donald Trump advisers and the Russian government.

“Do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign?” CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked California Sen. Dianne Feinstein during an interview on Wednesday.

“Not at this time,” she responded.

“Well, that’s a pretty precise answer,” Blitzer said.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...election-interference/?utm_term=.a5983b986024

Full transcript: Sally Yates and James Clapper testify on Russian election interference

GRAHAM: What I don't get is how the FBI can have a counter- intelligence investigation suggesting collusion, and you, as director of National Intelligence not know about it, and the FBI sign on to a report that basically said there was no collusion.

CLAPPER: I can only speculate why that's so. There wasn't — the evidence, if there was any, didn't reach the evidentiary bar in terms of the level of confidence that we were striving for in that intelligence community assessment.

...

YATES: If I could try to clarify one answer before as well, because I think, Senator Graham, you may have misunderstood me. You asked me whether I was aware of any evidence of collusion, and I declined to answer because answering would reveal classified information.

I believe that that's the same answer that Director Comey gave to this committee when he was asked this question as well. And he made clear, and I'd like to make clear, that just because I say I can't answer it, you should not draw from that an assumption that that means that the answer is yes.​
 
90
 
you investigate when there is indication to find out IF it happened.

"If" can always be raised by anyone. "If" is meaningless when you have no evidence. Proof should only be pursued as a follow on to creditable evidence.
Fishing expeditions are normally a bad idea, in this case it is sedition.
 
"If" can always be raised by anyone. "If" is meaningless when you have no evidence. Proof should only be pursued as a follow on to creditable evidence.
Fishing expeditions are normally a bad idea, in this case it is sedition.
Trump ran an entire campaign on provocation and sedition....America is terrible...horrible..drain the swamp....lock her up....our military is a mess...etc....he slandered and provoked pretty much every organization in the country and office flailing his way to power.....you should really rethink the sedition accusations considering the source...
 
Dems with hair on fire again!
Well going up mast today.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top