OT Hey Republicans

[Lanny]

Uh no. In fact it is in federal law.

Section 1252(c) of the "Aliens and Nationality" laws is titled: "Authorizing State and local law enforcement officials to arrest and detain certain illegal aliens." The section authorizes state and local law enforcement officials "to arrest and detain an individual who— (1) is an alien illegally present in the United States; and (2) has previously been convicted of a felony in the United States and deported or left the United States after such conviction."

Perhaps you can link me to were it says that because I've gone through that section of law line by line and can find no such statement.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1252

I guess you're saying that politifact as well as the Cornell law school are wrong. You're going to have to show me something more conclusive than your quote which appears to be in error.

I'd like to go through the law a couple more times to be certain but I just don't have the time so I'll leave it up to you to tell me where in that law your passage is.

 

[dviss1]

Perhaps you can link me to were it says that because I've gone through that section of law line by line and can find no such statement.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1252

I guess you're saying that politifact as well as the Cornell law school are wrong. You're going to have to show me something more conclusive than your quote which appears to be in error.

I'd like to go through the law a couple more times to be certain but I just don't have the time so I'll leave it up to you to tell me where in that law your passage is.

Is this federal law?

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-8-aliens-and-nationality/8-usc-sect-1252.html

IDGAF what they're defined as in federal law. It's callous.

 

[Lanny]

Is this federal law?

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-8-aliens-and-nationality/8-usc-sect-1252.html

IDGAF what they're defined as in federal law. It's callous.

It's right there in tiny tiny print. I can't see it because I don't have an electron microscope.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

Perhaps you can link me to were it says that because I've gone through that section of law line by line and can find no such statement.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1252

I guess you're saying that politifact as well as the Cornell law school are wrong. You're going to have to show me something more conclusive than your quote which appears to be in error.

I'd like to go through the law a couple more times to be certain but I just don't have the time so I'll leave it up to you to tell me where in that law your passage is.

My quote is directly from the politifact article I posted. So you'd be the one saying their content is wrong.

I'm saying their conclusion is wrong. Well, half wrong using their idiotic scale.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

On the plus side...I possibly told the governor of NV to go fuck himself today.

Not really, I told some woman who sent a text that at first glance made me think it was Sandoval to go fuck herself.

Still think it is a computer program, legal or not.

 

[Lanny]

My quote is directly from the politifact article I posted. So you'd be the one saying their content is wrong.

I'm saying their conclusion is wrong. Well, half wrong using their idiotic scale.

I went through it line by line and couldn't find it and that's why I'm asking you to direct me to where it's in the law as quoted by your link.
Look, I'm blind in one eye and don't see particularly well in the other eye so I may have missed it. Can you show it to me?

 

[jlprk]

(there's no such thing as an "illegal alien" in federal law)

Perhaps you can link me to were it says that because I've gone through that section of law line by line and can find no such statement.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1252

Using the Windows Find command, the only time on the page the word "illegal" appears is near the bottom in (f)(1). So you are right, for the link you gave.

(f)  Limit on injunctive relief
(1)  In general
Regardless of the nature of the action or claim or of the identity of the party or parties bringing the action, no court (other than the Supreme Court) shall have jurisdiction or authority to enjoin or restrain the operation of the provisions of part IV of this subchapter, as amended by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, other than with respect to the application of such provisions to an individual alien against whom proceedings under such part have been initiated.

 

[Lanny]

Just did

Here's a quote from within your link -

"That act, we saw, relies on the established definition of "alien" spotted earlier. It doesn’t explicitly define "illegal alien," though by our count, the term appears nine times including in a section titled "Demonstration project for identification of illegal aliens in incarceration facility of Anaheim, California" and a section titled "Pilot programs on limiting issuance of driver’s licenses to illegal aliens.""

Given that there's no definition of "Illegal Alien" do you suppose a Federal judge would never use the term?

 

[SlyPokerDog]

My favorite Illegal Alien movie is Men in Black.

 

[Lanny]

Alien
In Space No One Can Hear You Scream

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

Here's a quote from within your link -

"That act, we saw, relies on the established definition of "alien" spotted earlier. It doesn’t explicitly define "illegal alien," though by our count, the term appears nine times including in a section titled "Demonstration project for identification of illegal aliens in incarceration facility of Anaheim, California" and a section titled "Pilot programs on limiting issuance of driver’s licenses to illegal aliens.""

Given that there's no definition of "Illegal Alien" do you suppose a Federal judge would never use the term?

Old thread. Don't care. Saw the new numbers of illegals trying to get here. No biggie right?

 

[Lanny]

Old thread. Don't care. Saw the new numbers of illegals trying to get here. No biggie right?

Good point. Pretty old stuff. Not worth getting in a twist about.