Politics Hillary Clinton is a fucking loser

[3RA1N1AC]

My expectations aren't absurd.

I expect him to pick who he wants.

do you expect to think his picks are good?

 

[MarAzul]

do you expect to think his picks are good?

Absolutely. However, I don't expect the rioter or you to think they are.

 

[MarAzul]

blaming of Obama for the increase in the national debt

Fucking A.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

Absolutely. However, I don't expect the rioter or you to think they are.

well, duh. he can do no wrong in your eyes. i was asking denny, who is not a fan of his whatsoever.

 

[riverman]

I think Trump will lip sync the term and the GOP will vet everything through Pence...just like Bush and Cheney....Trump will just be a face and the GOP will drive the car from the sidelines

 

[riverman]

I'll say this....with total control of the branches of govt...the GOP has no more excuses for not making strides in infrastructure and employment...time will tell what they do with it

 

[MarAzul]

i was asking denny, who is not a fan of his whatsoever

Yeah I know. But I thought you ought to hear it from an expert.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

Yeah I know. But I thought you ought to hear it from an expert.

 

[riverman]

Hillary is rich, lives in a mansion and never needs to work another day in her life.....she's a winner folks

 

[Denny Crane]

do you expect to think his picks are good?

Like with Obama's picks, I reserve judgment until I see what they do. I didn't expect Obama to choose right wingers for his top positions.

 

[jlprk]

I'm sure President Trump is going to follow through and drain the swamp. He's already picked noted anti-corruption outsider reformists Giuliani, Christie and Gingrich for key administration positions.

He won. He has the right to pick who he wants.

Rasta said that Trump's campaign promise to drain the swamp is the opposite of putting 3 known corrupt politicians in charge. You answered with a non sequitur. Most. Obtuse. Ever.

You realize that your response totally misses the point, right? And kind of indicates that you don't really care about the things you claim to care about?

 

[Natebishop3]

Hillary is rich, lives in a mansion and never needs to work another day in her life.....she's a winner folks

Blood money.

 

[Denny Crane]

Rasta said that Trump's campaign promise to drain the swamp is the opposite of putting 3 known corrupt politicians in charge. You answered with a non sequitur. Most. Obtuse. Ever.

What part of "he won" don't you get?

To the victor goes the right to pick the top people in government. That's what Progressive government is: lots of unelected people wielding ridiculous amounts of power.

 

[UncleCliffy'sDaddy]

Bush spent 1/2 of TARP. Obama had the other half released by congress and also his $800B "emergency" stimulus bill on top of that.

I wouldn't have spent any of it.

I wouldn't have spent it either but it did help get the economy moving again. Unfortunately, if capitalists aren't making obscene amounts of money, the economy is a failure. My only real complaint is that Obama didn't let "too big to fail" companies like GMC do just that. Big business might have actually learned a positive lesson.....

 

[UncleCliffy'sDaddy]

Yeah I know. But I thought you ought to hear it from an expert.

Just because you are older than dirt doesn't make you the smartest guy in the room. Ironically, it was YOUR generation who started the U.S. rolling downhill towards the shitter. And you won't be around to clean up the mess. But you sure don't mind making it bigger while you still can. What worked half a century ago obviously isn't working now but that doesn't stop the Right from trying.......

 

[Rastapopoulos]

My expectations aren't absurd.

I expect him to pick who he wants.

This response indicates that you're not capable of IDENTIFYING the point.

 

[jlprk]

What part of "he won" don't you get?

To the victor goes the right to pick the top people in government. That's what Progressive government is: lots of unelected people wielding ridiculous amounts of power.

What part of "He broke his first (and one of the most important) campaign promise only the day after the election, how many more will there be?" don't you get?

Your answer is, "Breaking campaign promises is his right." Yet I've read you criticize Obama for some supposed promise that none of us remember, about a thousand times.

 

[H.C.]

Ooh, Zach. Might've had the moral high ground for about a second there, then suddenly it was all about Zach. Also? I'm guessing the fact that he zeroed in on climate change as the #1 threat in Zach-ville shows that he's white and he's not going to be jumped at the gas station in the wee small hours in the service of Making America Great Again. So: white man lecturing black woman. Good look, idealistic young Democrat.

This post is one of the most asinine and uninformed posts I've ever read on any website.

 

[MarAzul]

doesn't make you the smartest guy in the room.

Which room?

YOUR generation who started the U.S. rolling downhill towards the shitter.

My apologies.

And you won't be around to clean up the mess.

Still here.

What worked half a century ago obviously isn't working now

Yes I agree. A half century ago, the Democrat Johnson was causing havoc to storm our nation with economic disaster and the Vietnam war.
The turning point for me, I saw myself as a Democrat up to the time of Johnson.

that doesn't stop the Right from trying.

Still working on it.

 

[BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94]

If that is your definition of winner, wouldnt trump be a winner too?

A winner... with a winning temperament!

 

[Denny Crane]

I wouldn't have spent it either but it did help get the economy moving again. Unfortunately, if capitalists aren't making obscene amounts of money, the economy is a failure. My only real complaint is that Obama didn't let "too big to fail" companies like GMC do just that. Big business might have actually learned a positive lesson.....

It didn't get the economy moving again. It was spent and had nowhere near the promised effects.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/artic...t-failures-from-president-obamas-stimulus-law

 

[Denny Crane]

What part of "He broke his first (and one of the most important) campaign promise only the day after the election, how many more will there be?" don't you get?

Your answer is, "Breaking campaign promises is his right." Yet I've read you criticize Obama for some supposed promise that none of us remember, about a thousand times.

Running for office is one thing, governing is another.

Several of the people he's considering are so rich they don't need to take bribes.

 

[Denny Crane]

This response indicates that you're not capable of IDENTIFYING the point.

You're the one who seems to have issues with who he's appointing.

Guess what?

You lost.

He gets to choose his team.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

This post is one of the most asinine and uninformed posts I've ever read on any website.

It's like every youtube video of college crybullies made into one #%!=/÷!# post.

I can say $!%!×/## now cuz Trump won.

Ok, I edited it right away. Just because I can say it doesn't mean I should.

 

[Rastapopoulos]

Hillary's final vote tally may yet surpass Obama's in 2012.

Fucking loser!

 

[Rastapopoulos]

You're the one who seems to have issues with who he's appointing.

Guess what?

You lost.

He gets to choose his team.

Is this because "appointing" has "point" in it? I'm trying to work out your train of thought. Although perhaps "mayfly of thought" would be more appropriate.

 

[Rastapopoulos]

Running for office is one thing, governing is another.

Several of the people he's considering are so rich they don't need to take bribes.

You know who NEVER needs to take bribes? Monarchs! I think you're right - this whole democracy experiment has been a bit of a failure.

 

[Denny Crane]

Is this because "appointing" has "point" in it? I'm trying to work out your train of thought. Although perhaps "mayfly of thought" would be more appropriate.

My train of thought is simply that he won, he gets to pick his staff. You seem to be upset about that. Not my problem.

 

[Rastapopoulos]

Worth a read:

http://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044

Key excerpt explaining why the "Bernie would've beaten Trump" narrative is very naive:

Here are a few tastes of what was in store for Sanders, straight out of the Republican playbook: He thinks rape is A-OK. In 1972, when he was 31, Sanders wrote a fictitious essay in which he described a woman enjoying being raped by three men. Yes, there is an explanation for it—a long, complicated one, just like the one that would make clear why the Clinton emails story was nonsense. And we all know how well that worked out.

Then there’s the fact that Sanders was on unemployment until his mid-30s, and that he stole electricity from a neighbor after failing to pay his bills, and that he co-sponsored a bill to ship Vermont’s nuclear waste to a poor Hispanic community in Texas, where it could be dumped. You can just see the words “environmental racist” on Republican billboards. And if you can’t, I already did. They were in the Republican opposition research book as a proposal on how to frame the nuclear waste issue.

Also on the list: Sanders violated campaign finance laws, criticized Clinton for supporting the 1994 crime bill that he voted for, and he voted against the Amber Alert system. His pitch for universal health care would have been used against him too, since it was tried in his home state of Vermont and collapsed due to excessive costs. Worst of all, the Republicans also had video of Sanders at a 1985 rally thrown by the leftist Sandinista government in Nicaragua where half a million people chanted, “Here, there, everywhere/the Yankee will die,’’ while President Daniel Ortega condemned “state terrorism” by America. Sanders said, on camera, supporting the Sandinistas was “patriotic.”

The Republicans had at least four other damning Sanders videos (I don’t know what they showed), and the opposition research folder was almost 2-feet thick. (The section calling him a communist with connections to Castro alone would have cost him Florida.) In other words, the belief that Sanders would have walked into the White House based on polls taken before anyone really attacked him is a delusion built on a scaffolding of political ignorance.

 

[Rastapopoulos]

My train of thought is simply that he won, he gets to pick his staff. You seem to be upset about that. Not my problem.

Here is an analogy to illustrate what I mean by you missing the point:

DENNY: Candidate x is bad because he kicked an innocent person. I myself am opposed to violence against innocents.
LIBERAL: But Trump just blew that guy's head off with a bazooka!
DENNY: It was his bazooka.
LIBERAL: Yes, I know - but he just killed someone! Aren't you opposed to violence against innocents?
DENNY: What part of "it's his bazooka" don't you understand? You appear to be mad at someone using his own property in the way he sees fit. Butthurt much?