Politics Hillary is done

[magnifier661]

Bernie is a much better candidate than that idiotic blow hard. Mark my words: Trump is not going to win the primary.

Wager?

 

[dviss1]

Wager?

Lol. I'm not a betting man (with money anyway) but if he does win I will start a thread exclaiming how right you are but how wrong I was. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong. Others in here have issues with that.

 

[magnifier661]

Lol. I'm not a betting man (with money anyway) but if he does win I will start a thread exclaiming how right you are but how wrong I was. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong. Others in here have issues with that.

Deal! I will do the same

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Others in here have issues with that.

You're wrong that I have issues with admitting that I'm wrong because I am never wrong!

 

[Denny Crane]

This is what Obama and Hillary did to much of the world where they meddled.

 

[magnifier661]

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/0...ation-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html?_r=0

Second Review Says Classified Information Was in Hillary Clinton’s Email

• 
  Hillary Rodham Clinton’s work-related emails from when she was secretary of state are slowly being released by the State Department.
  CHARLIE NEIBERGALL / ASSOCIATED PRESS
  By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
  SEPTEMBER 7, 2015

WASHINGTON — A special intelligence review of two emails that Hillary Rodham Clinton received as secretary of state on her personal account — including one about North Korea’s nuclear weapons program — has endorsed a finding by the inspector general for the intelligence agencies that the emails contained highly classified information when Mrs. Clinton received them, senior intelligence officials said.

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign and the State Department disputed the inspector general’s finding last month and questioned whether the emails had been overclassified by an arbitrary process. But the special review — by the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency — concluded that the emails were “Top Secret,” the highest classification of government intelligence, when they were sent to Mrs. Clinton in 2009 and 2011.

On Monday, the Clinton campaign disagreed with the conclusion of the intelligence review and noted that agencies within the government often have different views of what should be considered classified.

Mrs. Clinton’s work-related emails from when she was secretary of state are slowly being released by the State Department.

 

[Denny Crane]

Drip
Drip
Drip

The truth comes out from this liar like that.

 

[Denny Crane]

She needs to make a speech to let everyone know she's not a crook. Like Nixon did.

 

[DaLincolnJones]

She is brilliant in how she is handling this. Like other scandals that swirl around her, she lets them string along until the average person A) Begins to believe that she is being targeted by partisan politics. B) As this drags along, even the few that understand that she is at fault lose interest.

 

[UncleCliffy'sDaddy]

She is brilliant in how she is handling this. Like other scandals that swirl around her, she lets them string along until the average person A) Begins to believe that she is being targeted by partisan politics. B) As this drags along, even the few that understand that she is at fault lose interest.

She's had a tremendous amount of experience at it dating back to when she was the First Lady of Arkansas. Practice makes perfect.....

 

[Denny Crane]

Cattlegate.
Billing Records.
Rose Law Firm in general.

Nothing has changed.

 

[e_blazer]

If she gets elected I think Brian Williams would be a natural for press secretary.

 

[Denny Crane]

If she gets elected I think Brian Williams would be a natural for press secretary.

Good one.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Bernie Sanders Takes the Lead in Iowa Poll

He's also ahead in New Hampshire
Bernie Sanders has taken a narrow lead over Hillary Clinton in Iowa more than four months before the state’s caucus, according to a poll released Thursday.

The Vermont senator is favorite among 41% of Iowa likely Democratic participants, compared with 40% supporting the former Secretary of State, according to a Quinnipiac poll released Thursday. That marks a major reversal from early July, when Clinton was ahead of Sanders, 52% to 33%.

http://time.com/4028812/bernie-sanders-iowa-poll/

 

[Denny Crane]

 

[magnifier661]

She should just back out and support Biden. Bernie has no chance beating any republican in the general election because he is way tooooo socialist

 

[BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94]

She should just back out and support Biden. Bernie has no chance beating any republican in the general election because he is way tooooo socialist

This is what I think too, he will make any republican look moderate during the debates.

 

[XuLouDon]

Bernie has no chance beating any republican in the general election because he is way tooooo socialist

Two weeks ago you said the only person you'd vote for over Trump was Bernie Sanders.

Only way I don't vote trump is if Bernie wins the dem primary

When I questioned how you could be in both Sanders' and Trump camps, you said:

Why not? Why not vote for the best president available, regardless of political side? I'm only registered republican because I want to vote for the primaries. I will not keep that vote for the presidential election.

As for Bernie... The dude is a "for the best interest of all citizens". I'm open to fed spending, as long as it's for the best interest for the greater good. As long as it's not for the best interest for a political agenda.

In the end, I'm still undecided. I want to see the presidential debates first

In that time you've learned - from the same sites and social media that you regurgitate here, I guess - that Sanders is way too socialist to beat ANY republican and have turned into a one man Donald Trump circle jerk with the ferocity of a rabid, yapping, chihuahua.

You called other people sheep, but in two weeks you've been influenced to the point of being completely swayed and forged by the media you take in. You should take a break from it, they're spinning you like a top.

 

[julius]

She should just back out and support Biden. Bernie has no chance beating any republican in the general election because he is way tooooo socialist

It's funny how you think you're actually making valid points in many of your political posts. You're like the Mixum of political posts.

 

[Denny Crane]

USA Today for the win!

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...clinton-middle-east-debacles-column/71949834/

Glenn Reynolds: The Obama-Hillary Mideast debacles

As Obama's Middle East policies continue to unravel, can Hillary Clinton escape the taint of disaster?

In the Middle East, everything Obama has touched has failed disastrously — and he’s had help in this failure from Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. With 2016 coming, will that provide an opening for Democratic candidates — like Webb, perhaps, or Bernie Sanders — who are untouched by these failures? Maybe so. But a bigger question is what burdens will America, and the world, have to bear because of this awful record. I fear that they will be very heavy indeed.

 

[Denny Crane]

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...il-released-state-department-column/71504450/

Clinton and Nixon both really sorry: Updated Column

The Democratic front-runner is starting to sound a little like a president who resigned.

Last month, famed Washington Post reporter andWatergate investigator Bob Woodward said that theemail scandal engulfing former secretary of State Hillary Clinton “reminds me of the Nixon tapes: thousands of hours of secretly recorded conversations that Nixon thought were exclusively his."

Woodward’s impression is justified, and not just by the steady drip, drip of new secrets in the latest batch of Clinton emails released by the State Department on Monday. There is also a remarkable resonance between Nixon’s statements during the evolving Watergate crisis and Clinton’s public statements regarding her emails:

The people come first

Nixon: I welcome this kind of examination, because people have got to know whether or not their President is a crook. Well, I am not a crook.

Clinton: I think it's kind of fun. People get a real-time behind-the-scenes look at what I was emailing about and what I was communicating about.

I want to get the facts out ...

Nixon: I want the public to learn the truth about Watergate and those guilty of any illegal actions brought to justice.

Clinton: I want it all out there.

...because they are on my side

Nixon: The facts will prove that the president is telling the truth.

Clinton: That does not change the facts, and no matter what anybody tries to say, thefacts are stubborn.

 

[magnifier661]

Two weeks ago you said the only person you'd vote for over Trump was Bernie Sanders.http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=d950cadf-05ce-4148-a125-35c0cdab26c6


When I questioned how you could be in both Sanders' and Trump camps, you said:

I would still want it that way. I just don't think Bernie would get the nationwide vote. I've also said that as well.

In that time you've learned - from the same sites and social media that you regurgitate here, I guess - that Sanders is way too socialist to beat ANY republican and have turned into a one man Donald Trump circle jerk with the ferocity of a rabid, yapping, chihuahua.

You called other people sheep, but in two weeks you've been influenced to the point of being completely swayed and forged by the media you take in. You should take a break from it, they're spinning you like a top.

No.... If Trump isn't on the general, and Bernie is there, I will vote for him.

 

[magnifier661]

It's funny how you think you're actually making valid points in many of your political posts. You're like the Mixum of political posts.

I firmly believe that the nation as a whole will not vote for Bernie. I stand by that statement because he is too socialist for a lot of Democrats to support.

 

[julius]

I firmly believe that the nation as a whole will not vote for Bernie. I stand by that statement because he is too socialist for a lot of Democrats to support.

and Trump is too Donald Trump for a lot of Republicans to support. The #'s that they're showing now are just the select few who are in states where they're doing early shit in, and it's against 900 other candidates, but once the herd is thinned, there's no way his bombastic, insulting and self important shtick will catch on with the rest of his party and definitely the rest of the country.

One candidate scares you with the (over stated) problems, the other offers solutions to those problems.

Who am I kidding, we're a country who loves to be scared.

 

[magnifier661]

and Trump is too Donald Trump for a lot of Republicans to support. The #'s that they're showing now are just the select few who are in states where they're doing early shit in, and it's against 900 other candidates, but once the herd is thinned, there's no way his bombastic, insulting and self important shtick will catch on with the rest of his party and definitely the rest of the country.

One candidate scares you with the (over stated) problems, the other offers solutions to those problems.

Who am I kidding, we're a country who loves to be scared.

Maybe so, but Trump has more support from independents and conservative liberals. Bernie will not get a single vote on the republican side.

 

[julius]

Maybe so, but Trump has more support from independents and conservative liberals. Bernie will not get a single vote on the republican side.

You yourself said you'd vote for Bernie if Trump isn't running...

Plus, that route worked inn the past. You have to include Women, Minorities and young people.

 

[magnifier661]

You yourself said you'd vote for Bernie if Trump isn't running...

Plus, that route worked inn the past. You have to include Women, Minorities and young people.

Trump has Bernie beat on all you just suggested, according to the USA poll.

And I definitely would vote for Bernie. I'm not a typical republican though. I'm more independent with very liberal social views.

 

[julius]

Trump has Bernie beat on all you just suggested, according to the USA poll.

And I definitely would vote for Bernie. I'm not a typical republican though. I'm more independent with very liberal social views.

What poll? Because I doubt that minorites are more interested in Trump than someone who actually wants to help them.

 

[Denny Crane]

What poll? Because I doubt that minorites are more interested in Trump than someone who actually wants to help them.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html

Trump beats Sanders in the RCP average and most recent polls.

Thank barfo!

 

[julius]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html

Trump beats Sanders in the RCP average and most recent polls.

Thank barfo!

that's an average of 3 polls, and also with little to no media representation for Bernie.

I wouldn't exactly pin my hopes on the guy who is in the news EVERY DAY and is barely beating a guy who is rarely on the news and isn't even the #1 candidate for President in his party.