- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 127,349
- Likes
- 147,874
- Points
- 115
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet she gets votes.... Lol
That way of thinking didn't work for Bernie. So maybe Hillary won't attempt it eitherI'll vote for her for $250,000.
Hahaha.I'll vote for her for $250,000.
I just don't understand why anyone wants to vote for her. She is just as bad as Trump, but Trump just comes out and says the evil shit that he stands for, while Hillary does all her dirty laundry behind closed doors like a good little politician. They're both evil. They're both bad for this country. We're completely screwed.
She's such a fucking 2 faced liar. Says WHATEVER to win. Calling young blacks "Super Predators" that "need to be brought to a heel".
I'm NOT voting for her if she wins the primary.
I don't even know how she's a Democrat. She's another on of those Dick Cheney, Donald Rumself politicians who represent the corporations, and they don't care about the people. They care about money and that's it. I think Hillary would sell her own daughter to win this election.
I don't even know how she's a Democrat. She's another on of those Dick Cheney, Donald Rumself politicians who represent the corporations, and they don't care about the people. They care about money and that's it. I think Hillary would sell her own daughter to win this election.
Hillary Clinton did not pay herself $250,000. This is just sloppy reporting from a right-wing rag.
Rather, these are "in-kind" contributions that Clinton made to her own campaign. Likely, they are campaign expenses that Clinton paid for out of personal funds that the campaign is not reimbursing her for.
The FEC handles in-kind contributions a bit weirdly. The in-kind contributions are reported as receipts, but there is no cash coming in. In order to balance the books of a campaign, they are reported as both a receipt (a contribution) and a disbursement (a payment)--that way it doesn't look like the campaign is sitting on a bunch of non-existent cash.
From the FEC website:
In order to avoid inflating/deflating the cash on hand amount, the amount of an in-kind contribution from an individual should be disclosed as a receipt on Line 11(a)(i) of the Detailed Summary Page (Contributions from Individuals/Persons) and a disbursement on Line 21(b) of the Detailed Summary Page(Other Federal Operating Expenditures)
The Free Beacon saw the disbursements to Hillary Clinton and assumed that she was paying herself. What they missed is that there are matching receipts for each of these entries from Clinton.
It's an awesome story, Hillary paying herself with campaign funds.
Too bad it isn't true.
barfo
the story was amended, it was misunderstood. She did not pay herself.
She's a lesser of two evils in the expected eventual matchup, but evil is an apt word. I'm kind of hoping she gets indicted (I don't think she will) because that may be the only shot to get someone I actually want to vote for to be an option.No but it is pretty slick, get paid by Wall Street company for speech, take money and donate it to your own campaign. Freeing Wall Street company to make an additional donation to campaign.
She's a lesser of two evils in the expected eventual matchup, but evil is an apt word. I'm kind of hoping she gets indicted (I don't think she will) because that may be the only shot to get someone I actually want to vote for to be an option.
I'd watch Hillary if she took it up the buttI bet the guys at Vivid Video will pay her $1mill to do a porno.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/adu...-to-star-in-his-boyhood-fantasy-teen-tt-film/
http://www.thewrap.com/miss-colombia-gets-1-million-offer-to-do-porn/
I'd watch Hillary if she took it up the butt
I've never voted for that lying bitch.
I'd watch Hillary if she took it up the butt
