and the rest is very worthy of reading too. Thank You Buster Olney, I've been waiting for you to come through...! If you join our board, we will give you an Honorary Status, whatever the hell that means....!
"Maybe I should’ve figured it out last year, but this puzzle cannot be solved. There’s no way to judge each candidate strictly on his merits given the current ballot limitations, no fair way to vote."
"I can’t stand the protest ballots we’ve seen in the past, when someone signs a blank ballot that counts as a vote against all candidates. That’s unfair. I’ve hated to hear the stories of voters who haven’t voted for a player because they didn’t like them personally. The voting shouldn’t be about the writer; it should be only about the players and whether or not they’re worthy of induction."
And I can’t stand the idea of casting a ballot that works against players that I think should be inducted, such as "Mussina, Schilling or others. So as much as it has been an honor in the past to participate in the voting, I’ll abstain, and hope that in the future the rules change."
I’m not sure that I would abstain in his situation. I think any benefit the lack of an Olney ballot may bring is outweighed by the fact that there will be one less ballot with many worthy names on it, as his ballot always has. Does this help Mike Mussina a bit? Sure. But it hurts other candidates Olney routinely supports.
Still, I get his frustration. And I agree with him completely that the Hall of Fame voting process is broken and needs to be fixed.