Honest discussion about the team

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

My question is why does it seem like LMA is changing his mind? Why can't he understand we had a bunch of injuries hit us hard?

The only thing that concerns me is the sudden regression of Lillard. Call it what you want but everybody knows the reason LMA would resign is the sudden emergence of a legitimate superstar next to him. Top players love to have help like a superstar next to them. Especially when that star came to them not the other way but now that looks like it's changing.
 
And Zero true desire to actually win.

LOL! I call BS on that.

You don't think PA wants to win? Olshey? The players? The Blazers are just some giant conspiracy, designed to never win a championship?
 
who has olshey drafted thats helped besides lillard? such an overrated GM, got gifted Robin Lopez and Afflalo.
 
also lillard is getting outplayed by mike conley who has one leg and beno udrih, his defense is the worst in the league. Lamarcus and Robin Lopez are leaving. Rip city for real lmao
 
also lillard is getting outplayed by mike conley who has one leg and beno udrih, his defense is the worst in the league. Lamarcus and Robin Lopez are leaving. Rip city for real lmao

how many names you gonna have by the end of the weekend?
 
Are the Timbertrolls back?
theyre still in spain
tumblr_nmrdg9LKoI1usicl7o1_400.gif
 
Robin Lopez: A very hard decision is gonna be made, my personal opinion would be to let him walk if he gets an offer over 11 million dollars per season. If we can get him at around 10-11 he is worth keeping, bug bodies are at a premium even if they aren't all star level.

I know the cap is going up, but anything over 8 million per year for Lopez is an awful deal. If he had a better offensive game, then maybe. Lopez is already on the decline in both points and rebounds and is just another body on the floor that the other team can slack off from.
 
One thing I'm tired of hearing from the team is the sense of pride in coming back from double digit deficits and having lethargic 1st half production or defense. It's like they feel they only have to play half a game to win. Without Wes it isn't working. Wes was that guy that would lock the defense in and make sure everyone is on the same page. After his injury they just seem too content to rely on dumping off to Aldridge every possession..serious lack of balance on offense
 
One thing I'm tired of hearing from the team is the sense of pride in coming back from double digit deficits and having lethargic 1st half production or defense. It's like they feel they only have to play half a game to win. Without Wes it isn't working. Wes was that guy that would lock the defense in and make sure everyone is on the same page. After his injury they just seem too content to rely on dumping off to Aldridge every possession..serious lack of balance on offense

You know the season is over when Riverman finds something wrong!!!
 
You know the season is over when Riverman finds something wrong!!!
My rule is always...never in a game thread! I like this version of the Blazers..you obviously have missed my old Felton rage from days gone by
 
I agree with your assessment of Stotts. Memphis has a weakness that's plagued them in the 2nd half of the season - you can take them out of their offense by pressuring their backcourt. They don't have dynamic playmakers or dead eye shooters on the perimeter so you can get away with extending your defense & anticipating passing lanes. Their offense after the AS game was really bad. But we don't even try to exploit this. We let them walk it up & throw it into the post with no resistance. Even with Conley & Udrich out, 3rd string Calathes went wherever he wanted with the ball. At least we finally TRIED to show full court pressure in the 4th, but it was weak. Obviously it's not something we work on that much, which is unfortunate because that's the way to beat the Grizz. I fully expect the Warriors to fluster the Grizz by pressuring/trapping them defensively. It's kind of the blueprint for how to beat them. Nobody lets them walk it up and concedes passing lanes into the post, except us. 7 times we've seen the same thing. No adjustments have been made, few even attempted. Stotts likes to say "we're not going to change who we are because of who we're playing." That's not acceptable, especially when you're playing a team that has proven over, & over, & over that they are better than us at the style we're playing. With the way they play defense, we needed to get extra possessions to compete in this series. Forcing some turnovers would have been nice. I'm not ok with chalking that up to "that's not who we are", and I'm not ok with how (even before Wes went down) teams were able to chase our shooters off the 3pt line, while being able to double team LA + blanket Dame on the perimeter. What Terry calls "sticking to our principles" I call not being able to make adjustments. I doubt the Blazers will show him the door. They just gave him an extension last summer & it wouldn't be very "Spurs-like" (the model organization we're trying to follow) to let a coach go after winning a division title. Only way is if Dame & LA voice frustrations on their exit interviews. They look frustrated, especially Dame, who has been getting lit up by fans/media for his defense. He is a liability on that end for sure, but the way he's coached to defend the pick & roll really makes him look a lot worse than he is. Neither has criticized the coach (as far as we know) & it may never happen, but that's the only way I could see Stotts getting let go.

Assuming he's back next season, we can only hope he uses the offseason to add more wrinkles to his style of play. Good teams play good defense and can force turnovers, plain & simple. We we're dead last in the league for the 2nd year in a row at forcing turnovers. At the very least we need to bring in an assistant to shore up our defense. It'll be interesting to see what everyone says when it's over. The easy thing to do is to pin all of our 2nd half/post season struggles on the injuries. Obviously losing Wes was devastating, but if that's how Stotts & Olshey spin ALL of the team's struggles it'll be disappointing. Last night with our backs against the wall we had an opportunity when Conley went down. 3rd string PG, a double digit deficit, & we can't force him into a single turnover? That's not just missing Wes, or not having the right personnel, that is because we haven't worked enough on playing defense like that. There's no excuse for that. We have been thoroughly outplayed in this series, but a lot of that is related to how bad we're being out-coached & out-schemed. Of all the frustrations from this season, the worst for me is the "Groundhog Day" feeling of not being able to adapt & make adjustments. Hopefully the last 2 months + this series are opening some eyes & isn't reduced to "if only we still had Wes . . . ". If we do get swept or lose in 5, it does seem like Allen & Olshey can feel the ground shaking. Both of our All Stars are demoralized to the point where 1 may bolt. The gravity feels heavier than getting blown out/taught a playoff lesson by the Spurs last year. Part of that should be to change the coach or make the coach change.
Great post. Agree with most everything you said

In the first half of they year, blazers had some serious warts... But no one wanted to look at them because they were winning.
 
the honest point is that considering the injuries, coaching rotation decisions and player performance - we're simply not equipped to compete with a team like Memphis.... and even less now that before and we weren't then either.
 
Ha! Felton rage! I could never have caught it, my own rage was far too consuming to see past my nose.
I believe the homers and pessimists all agreed on Felton. I don't think there was a single fan that supported FAILTON
 
I believe the homers and pessimists all agreed on Felton. I don't think there was a single fan that supported FAILTON

Oh, I got shit for not supporting him from the get go. For some reason, I had been watching some Denver games where he caught my eye. As I recall he couldn't even make a free throw, and then we traded for him. That lite me up with the WTF right now. Then the shit started coming my way for not giving him a chance, but my thinking was already, he has no chance.
 
Last edited:
We let Patty Mills go back then too. That sure is a WTF now watch him go to work.
 
If you lose LA and just build around a shoot-first PG in the Western Conference, you are stuck in lottery limbo anyway. You aren't getting into the playoffs. You aren't getting the top pick. And you aren't drawing big names just because Damian Lillard is here, either.

See, I don't think we need to trade Dame to contend for the top pick. I think not bringing anyone back and a lineup of Dame, McCollum, Batum, Leonard, and Freeland would contend for the top pick of the draft.
 
and they are killin it for the leagues best bench! Portland definitely doesnt have depth problems because those guys are studs.
 
and they are killin it for the leagues best bench! Portland definitely doesnt have depth problems because those guys are studs.
Yep! 3rd year players and one that was injured for 2 seasons. It's gonna be a bright future yo!
 
Back
Top