Hoops World Fail - Part Deux

[BenDavis503]

http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=13660

Looks like they wised up lol

Portland fans owned this guy hahaha

 

[hasoos]

Hoopsworld "Top 5 SG" Article writer realizes his mistake!

http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=13660

Enjoy

 

[Master Shake]

Fail.

 

[mook]

Succeed.

 

[BenDavis503]

Must you fail, to succeed?

 

[mook]

Just seems like there's too much fail on the internet. I find it depressing.

I thought I'd try to start a new internet meme based on positivity. Can't be that hard, right?

 

[BlazersBlood]

WIN

I think that's what the kids say these days. Roy at #3 is full of WIN.

 

[BenDavis503]

WIN

I think that's what the kids say these days. Roy at #3 is full of WIN.

Yes, there is the WIN cake. Plenty of that out in the intarwebs. But FAIL is so much more funz!

 

[MrSelfDestruct]

I like that Roy is #3, however, a couple things about that article still have me scratching my head.

Not only that, but Roy's PER (24.08) is third among shooting guards behind the two guys rated above him here, while Johnson sits in ninth with a PER of 18.26. Considering both guys are relatively equal right now...

That makes no sense to me. How are they "relatively equal" again? He even states earlier that he originally had Johnson at #3 and Roy at #4. Meanwhile, every shred of factual backing (stats, etc.) show that it's not really all that close.

 

[mook]

WIN

I think that's what the kids say these days. Roy at #3 is full of WIN.

Ah. I've been dwned.

 

[BenDavis503]

Ah. I've been dwned.

You got teached.

 

[BenDavis503]

Re: Hoopsworld "Top 5 SG" Article writer realizes his mistake!

http://sportstwo.com/forums/showthread.php?t=146042

Literally beat you there by 1 minute!

 

[BlazersBlood]

Ah. I've been dwned.

Reverse pwnage

 

[hasoos]

Re: Hoopsworld "Top 5 SG" Article writer realizes his mistake!

Cool, merge at will Mods!

 

[BBert]

I like that Roy is #3, however, a couple things about that article still have me scratching my head.



That makes no sense to me. How are they "relatively equal" again? He even states earlier that he originally had Johnson at #3 and Roy at #4. Meanwhile, every shred of factual backing (stats, etc.) show that it's not really all that close.

Yeah, that really jumped out at me too. This guy sure has a boner for Joe Johnson. It's not even close, IMO. I'd have Johnson on the honorable mention list. Oh, well, as a fan he has a right to value JJ as high as he wants, and we have a right to argue about it.