Politics How can u even support Obama with a straight face?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

trying to find that quote online and it doesn't seem to be out there. help me out?
 
link to the quote? I can find the part about broken heart and terrorism reference but the middle part about white privelidge being the root cause seems to not exist.
 
I have ocean front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you Mags.
 
Someone really needs to take away your internet privileges.

Not only is that waaaaaaay too crowded to be on TV, the grammar and the spacing in the quote is off.

It goes "Vester Flanagan,was" instead of "Vester Flanagan was"

Plus, if you google the first sentence of the "quote", this is what you get in return.

No results found for "Vester Flanagan was another tragedy of gun violence".
 
Give it two years and this kind of quote won't be too shocking

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
 
I don't believe that's a screen shot of fox news.
 
Give it two years and this kind of quote won't be too shocking

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk

Sure, from wanna be conservative anti-hipters on message boards.
 
View attachment 5704

This has become beyond ridiculous! Disgusting!!!!!
I guess when the president spends the better part of two terms creating division, this is what you end up with.

I think we are gonna see some crazy shit soon enough. Both sides are extremely heated and the unbiased are caught in the middle.

You know it's bad when they don't give a shit about the white presidential liberal that actually has their back. They see all whites as the enemy.
 
I don't get this whole border wall deal. Wouldn't it be a lot more efficient just to conquer Mexico? A wall between Mexico and Guatemala/Belize would be a lot shorter to build.
 
I don't get this whole border wall deal. Wouldn't it be a lot more efficient just to conquer Mexico? A wall between Mexico and Guatemala/Belize would be a lot shorter to build.

It's a talking point. They need a target, and them "illegals" are it.
 
It's a talking point. They need a target, and them "illegals" are it.

I think it's more than a talking point. It's a legitimate public policy question. When Reagan worked with congress to pass an amnesty deal, it gave legal status to around 3.5 million people. In the nearly 30 years since then, another 11 to 12 million people have entered the country illegally. Certainly it raises public policy concerns. What's dumb is that both sides aren't working together to come up with a reasonable plan to establish legal status for those who are here and are productive and not committing crimes, while figuring out a way to limit new illegal immigration.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top