How does Vince Carter feel right now?

[Netsfan99]

Isnt MisterMontross basically Mr.Montross from the old forum who kept talking negative about VC?...even got banned once?....wow he talks so much about VC that he makes VC look like a megastar instead of superstar. Thanks man !! talk more about him!

 

[GMJ]

Isnt MisterMontross basically Mr.Montross from the old forum who kept talking negative about VC?...even got banned once?....wow he talks so much about VC that he makes VC look like a megastar instead of superstar. Thanks man !! talk more about him!

The thread is about Vince Carter, not a poster. Please don't go off topic.

GMJ

 

[MisterMontross]

Lol, one of them was a game winning shot, genius.

A game-winning shot. LOL!!!

In the playoffs? As a Net?

And a game-winning shot (I remember Lester Conner and Ray Williams hitting regular season game winning shots) is supposed to erase the fact that he doesn't put forth ultimate effort in the playoffs.

 

[NOMAM]

"got his team to the 2nd round"?

The Nets have traded all three guys that got Nets into the '07 playoffs 2nd rd.

Carter was pitiful in the '07 playoffs. Pitiful. That is without question, and a BIG reason no team wanted him in the '07 offseason.

Ah yes, same old patented Montross garbage. Disregard the good things Carter did while bashing Carter for anything negative. Games 3 & 4 of the Nets-Raptors series? Never happened in Montross's universe!

Anyways, Carter was HUGE in getting the Nets to the playoffs and the sixth seed to draw the Raptors in the first round to begin with. He was absolutely dominant in games 3 & 4 coming out and burying the Raptors who found themselves in a hole early which they weren't able to recover from. Those two games gave the Nets a 3-1 cushion in the series and backed up their game 1 victory to take away home court advantage. And while Carter struggled in parts of game 1, he came up big down the stretch with key plays like setting up Nachbar for a crucial 3 as well as a driving layup to give the Nets a nice lead in the final minute and a half of the game.

As anyone paying attention should realize, it was Vince's lack of stepping up in the 4th qtr of game six, after Kidd had PERSONALLY brought Nets back in the 3rd qtr of that game, that defines Vince as a Net.

Well, it's certainly clear you weren't paying attention because it was a lack of being able to make shots in the 4th quarter by the Nets AS A TEAM for them not being able to come out with the win and send the series to a game 7.

BTW, why no obsessive whining over the years about Kidd's performance vs the Pacers in the 06 playoffs like you do with Carter?

 

[GMJ]

You want results, but you don't want results. Well if you only seem to care about playoff performances, that's fine. If nothing else matters to you I don't know what to say, except that I'll miss you in September and I'll see you in June.

 

[MisterMontross]

You want results, but you don't want results. Well if you only seem to care about playoff performances, that's fine. If nothing else matters to you I don't know what to say, except that I'll miss you in September and I'll see you in June.

Sorry, I really didn't mean to step on you and your friends Vince-fest.

Please enjoy the circle... err..... discussion.

 

[GMJ]

ha, there are bigger Nets fans than myself.

If you really feel that strongly, that playoff performances matter and regular season performances don't, then I won't be seeing you around the site during the Nets season, because if you do then you're a hypocrite and you just used that as an excuse to bash Vince's victory. You're biased. When Vince doesn't win games he's horrible. When he does win games they don't count. Anyone can see that your opinion on Vince can't be taken seriously.

 

[MisterMontross]

ha, there are bigger Nets fans than myself.

If you really feel that strongly, that playoff performances matter and regular season performances don't, then I won't be seeing you around the site during the Nets season, because if you do then you're a hypocrite and you just used that as an excuse to bash Vince's victory. You're biased. When Vince doesn't win games he's horrible. When he does win games they don't count. Anyone can see that your opinion on Vince can't be taken seriously.

I'm sorry if you misunderstood. I think Vince is a big POS in the regular season also. Just doesn't reach the heights of 'dog' that he does in the playoffs.

And Vince is certainly on the level of Lester Conner and Ray Williams, as far as desire and passion to win.

You know, I'll have to amend that.

Vince is certainly below Lester's & Ray's level of desire and passion to win.

Does that clear things up?

Don't mess with my game.

 

[GMJ]

If you said that you wanted results that only support your opinion you should have just asked. I'll be sure to withhold times that Vince won us games since you only care about posting for the sake of reading your won words, and reaffirming previously held beliefs.

 

[MisterMontross]

If you said that you wanted results that only support your opinion you should have just asked. I'll be sure to withhold times that Vince won us games since you only care about posting for the sake of reading your won words, and reaffirming previously held beliefs.

Pal, you just believe what you believe, and I'll believe my eyes, and the circumstances as they exist in the NBA, and with Vince.

At this point, our views are conflicted.

 

[Netsfan99]

I loved it when VC averaged 30/6/7 during the 05-06 playoffs. Amazing numbers. Besides Lebron and Kobe, nobody can do that. !

 

[GMJ]

Once again, the topic is about Vince Carter, not any particular posters.

 

[jerseycarter15]

Once again, the topic is about Vince Carter, not any particular posters.

Why you delete my comment

 

[MaxaMillion711]

I agree with what jigga said regarding if all you care about is playoffs and nothing else. Nothing we can do to change your mind.

I thougt what vince did In the 2nd half of the season last year would have shut up any haters. Specially those who watch him on a nightly basis. I thought that defined him as a net. Lost Kidd. Lost his ankle. Lost his hope to win it all. Yet he still played his butt off and put up amazing numbers and becamE a true leader. It's a shame to see that pLayer get so much unnecissary hate. I really do feel sorry for the haters. They spend so much time hating that they miss out on this hall of famers career.

 

[soul driver]

Max, your posts have put smiles on my face. I also want to thank you for putting up and offering games to people. It makes me feel good to be a Net fan.

 

[Denny Crane]

I hear Carter ate a spicy pizza and had bad gas, then took a few tums and feels much better now.

 

[GMJ]

I don't know how many more times I should have to say this, but this is getting to be pretty ridiculous. This isn't a thread to dump on a guy because he doesn't like a certain player. This is a thread to discuss Vince.

Some of you need to grow up. If you really think someone's opinion is that wrong than you should be able to defend it intelligently. After that, it's probably better to agree to disagree than to get frustrated and start making fun of someone.

 

[dino33]

lol, someone put up the numbers last year

I cant clearly remember them but it was something like




when carter is playing the team can win not much but at leat 3X games

When carter was hurt the team won 0 games.


That basically shows how much he contributes to the team winning. Past playoffs dont mean shit, T-mac = rubbish coz he can never go past round 1?

 

[pegs]

lol, someone put up the numbers last year

I cant clearly remember them but it was something like




when carter is playing the team can win not much but at leat 3X games

When carter was hurt the team won 0 games.


That basically shows how much he contributes to the team winning. Past playoffs dont mean shit, T-mac = rubbish coz he can never go past round 1?

That just reminds me - I love how T-Mac is hated on because he can't get past the 1st round...but then people compare T-Mac with Vince, and they'll say T-Mac is the better player.

 

[MaxaMillion711]

That just reminds me - I love how T-Mac is hated on because he can't get past the 1st round...but then people compare T-Mac with Vince, and they'll say T-Mac is the better player.

i know, right? that is something i will never understand. look at this:

wow.....huge discrepancy there huh

 

[danxcr]

i know, right? that is something i will never understand. look at this:

wow.....huge discrepancy there huh

and carter did it with a bum ankle! and tmac had a better supportin cast even without yao... scola, battier, hayes (and yao for most of the season)

 

[MisterMontross]

and carter did it with a bum ankle! and tmac had a better supportin cast even without yao... scola, battier, hayes (and yao for most of the season)

And McGrady's back? And McGrady's ability (and willingness) to take over a game.

Stats are just numbers on paper. Great performances happen on the court.

 

[pegs]

And McGrady's back? And McGrady's ability (and willingness) to take over a game.

Stats are just numbers on paper. Great performances happen on the court.

Wow, don't tell me you back McGrady, but put down Carter.

And then you claim playoffs matter more than regular season.

That's a contradiction at its best.

 

[MisterMontross]

And McGrady's back? And McGrady's ability (and willingness) to take over a game.

Stats are just numbers on paper. Great performances happen on the court.

pegs, so you disagree with my statement? If so, tell me which parts.

 

[MaxaMillion711]

yeah dude you've kinda backed yourself in a corner here. Game 1 and 2 vs jazz last year, I'm pretty sure tmac scored a grand total of 1 point in both 4th periods And In game 6 he scored close to nothing in the crucial 3rd quarter and they got down by 20. He ended up scoring 40 but only after the game was already decided. You call that a great performance? You call tracts 8 year stink a thon in the playoffs a great performance? How about vinces great performance in game four vs the pacers to tie it up. And then his 35pt 15rb and game winning dunk over oneal in the series changing game 5? The thing I've noticed with you is that ommit all the greatness vince has done over the years and only point out the bad he has done. Very classy act.

Thank you for refreshing my mind about all of vince great games though. So you got that right.

 

[zєяσ]

The funny part is that Vince's stats were better than Tmac's last season and plenty of great performances as Net, and that you completely ignore Vince's great performances in the season and playoffs while backing a player who is very similar but never made it past the 1st round..

 

[pegs]

pegs, so you disagree with my statement? If so, tell me which parts.

The part where you hated on Carter because of his play in the playoffs, and yet back up T-Mac for...um...well, I don't know why.

Ask yourself this: How many times has Carter gotten past the first round? And how about McGrady?

 

[MisterMontross]

yeah dude you've kinda backed yourself in a corner here. Game 1 and 2 vs jazz last year, I'm pretty sure tmac scored a grand total of 1 point in both 4th periods And In game 6 he scored close to nothing in the crucial 3rd quarter and they got down by 20. He ended up scoring 40 but only after the game was already decided. You call that a great performance? You call tracts 8 year stink a thon in the playoffs a great performance? How about vinces great performance in game four vs the pacers to tie it up. And then his 35pt 15rb and game winning dunk over oneal in the series changing game 5? The thing I've noticed with you is that ommit all the greatness vince has done over the years and only point out the bad he has done. Very classy act.

Thank you for refreshing my mind about all of vince great games though. So you got that right.

Don't believe I was referring to one or two games. I was talking about their playoff careers.

And, really, I take McGrady over Vince, even with the back problems because, again, McGrady has the will to take over and dominate games by playing aggressively.

Vince doesn't have the drive to be aggressive on any type of consistant basis.

 

[pegs]

Don't believe I was referring to one or two games. I was talking about their playoff careers.

And, really, I take McGrady over Vince, even with the back problems because, again, McGrady has the will to take over and dominate games by playing aggressively.

Vince doesn't have the drive to be aggressive on any type of consistant basis.

I notice multiple contradictions in this. First of, McGrady over Carter because of their playoff careers. Secondly, choosing McGrady over Carter because of aggressiveness.

 

[MisterMontross]

I notice multiple contradictions in this. First of, McGrady over Carter because of their playoff careers. Secondly, choosing McGrady over Carter because of aggressiveness.

You are saying Vince is more aggressive than McGrady, and more willing to take over games?

If that's what you are saying then you are wrong, and the majority of NBA players and management disagree with you.