It's already been established that the number of dropped passes was a minimal percentage of overall passes thrown. Oregon had a similar situation with dropped passes vs LSU. It can be caused by a lot of different factors including due to a defense doing some things right - disrupting timing, rushing throws, etc. No one has even mentioned that a few of the throws were rushed and the WR was still running route and not looking for the ball. Clearly, timing and defense were doing their job.
As the announcer stated, at lease four of the muffed passes were passes that Foles hits 99 out of 100 times with his WR in practice. Timing...
If I understand correctly, it's been claimed 40% of passes were wide open and if it were not for dropped passes, UA would have at least kept it close.
There are no factual basis for this, however, I do respect your opinion. I certainly disagree, because I not only saw something else develop on the field, I read reports from Kelly and media that would disagree with your theory.
Stats and the end score show Oregon secondary performed their role. Does it make more sense to you if I say "Arizona's completion %" instead of Foles?
My gosh......