SodaPopinski
Tigers love pepper
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,856
- Likes
- 50
- Points
- 48
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, Sarah Palin is in no way, shape or form ready to be President. Neither was Dan Quayle nor Spiro Agnew.
And neither is Obama......scares the hell out of me that he might be our next president. At least Palin could learn while be vice president.
And neither is Obama......scares the hell out of me that he might be our next president. At least Palin could learn while being vice president.
I wasn't in the mood to start a firestorm, but I agree wholeheartedly. He is the least qualified major party presidential candidate in my lifetime. Jimmy Carter was more qualified to be President.
What makes McCain ready to be president, and Obama not? It isn't something that you need to say, go get a degree for, like if you want to practice engineering. You look at these guys, and you say, do they have the competency to be president. Barack Obama flies through that test. The other 3 candidates all struggle through that. Then you look at whose plans you like more, and which would be for America.
Please tell me specifically what makes Obama not ready to lead this country.
I wasn't in the mood to start a firestorm, but I agree wholeheartedly. He is the least qualified major party presidential candidate in my lifetime. Jimmy Carter was more qualified to be President.
Obama sure did a bang-up job yesterday as the "lead" for the bi-partisan meeting in the White House.
I wonder if his ineffectiveness has rattled some of his colleagues, even in spite of their expected partisan talking points today.
I wasn't in the mood to start a firestorm, but I agree wholeheartedly. He is the least qualified major party presidential candidate in my lifetime. Jimmy Carter was more qualified to be President.
That's the unreported story. The Democrats let him speak for them, and he blew up any sense of bi-partisanship. Yep, this is a guy who can bring people together.
The Democrats let him speak for them, and he blew up any sense of bi-partisanship. Yep, this is a guy who can bring people together.
Obama sure did a bang-up job yesterday as the "lead" for the bi-partisan meeting in the White House.
Sen. Judd Gregg, R-New Hampshire, said Friday afternoon the involvement of McCain and his opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, helped push negotiations forward.
Gee, who should I believe, a leading Republican senator involved in the bailout negotiations or two conservative honks on this board who haven't been in any of the meetings in Washington?
IT'S A TOUGH ONE
-Pop
I watched Palin's interview last night with Katie Couric (part two of ?) and it was painful to listen to. I'm not claiming Obama to be the most experienced or even the best candidate that could have been presented in this election cycle (I was partial to Ron Paul, Joe Biden, and Bill Richardson before the primaries gave us our choices), but as Mook said above, he does at least seem to possess intelligence and the ability to clearly communicate that intelligence ... I'm just hoping he has wisdom to go with it.
Why does everyone keep comparing Obama to Palin? She's not running for President.............?
The other thing that cracks me up is Obama's choice for VP Biden was a horrible choice. I hate Hillary but had he chose Hillary he would have killed McCain/Palin in this election.
I watched Palin's interview last night with Katie Couric (part two of ?) and it was painful to listen to. I'm not claiming Obama to be the most experienced or even the best candidate that could have been presented in this election cycle (I was partial to Ron Paul, Joe Biden, and Bill Richardson before the primaries gave us our choices), but as Mook said above, he does at least seem to possess intelligence and the ability to clearly communicate that intelligence ... I'm just hoping he has wisdom to go with it.
I think neither ticket is ideal, but the notion of a President Palin scares the hell out of me more than the prospect of an Obama presidency at this point.
I compare Obama to Palin, because there is the very real possibility that she'll be called upon to assume the office of president given McCain's 4 bouts with cancer and his relatively advanced age (for a first term president).
As for Biden, he may have footinmouthitis, but the man is actually a very savvy Senator with a deep knowledge foreign affairs.
I think neither ticket is ideal, but the notion of a President Palin scares the hell out of me more than the prospect of an Obama presidency at this point.
It was painful to watch wasn't it . . . and that is saying a lot becauase usally I can watch a good looking female and not care much what she is saying. But for Palin's sake I just wanted the interview to end.
Both Biden and Obama have "footinmouthitis". I agree neither ticket is perfect but for now I'm leaning towards McCain/Palin. I would much rather take my chance on a questionable VP rather than a questionable President. Biden could just as easily end up President, and I could see him sticking his foot in his mouth when he talks to Putin.......
The difference between Biden's frequent gaffes and Palin's, is that his usually have more to do with mangling lines and saying things in the heat of the moment, whereas with Palin I see someone who has clearly given very little thought to foreign affairs and some of the larger issues facing this country; she seems completely poleaxed when asked to answer things that you would hope she had given some consideration beforehand.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think she's stupid, I just think she's completely in over her head and displays the same kind of intellectual "incuriousness" that marked George W's 8 year run.
How do you define "qualified?" Is it based on his prior jobs, or his understanding of the issues?
Obama clearly understands the nuances of all the major issues, so that isn't it.
If it is because of his resume, then I submit that there is no correlation between that sort of experience and performace as president. He has no less qualified than Abraham Lincoln, among others.
I'd like to hear Ms. Palin explain her understanding of the issues, in her own words. I have yet to do so.
Please. Biden believes that FDR was the President and went on "TV" when the market crashed. It's idiotic; there is no other way to sugarcoat it.
Part of Palin's problem is that so little is known of her that all we have to go off right now, formulating an opinion of her, is almost completely dominated by what little we have seen of her in the past few weeks. For good or bad, Biden is a fairly known quantity, so his latest flub falls within the context of a 25 years record of being a public figure.
Someone who has the first idea of what it is to run something and knows how to lead. Obama hasn't distinguished himself on either count. He's running a cult of personality based on a failed 40 year old playbook.
He still can't admit The Surge worked.
He actually asked Al-Maliki to delay an agreement so it would happen under his administration.
Where was anyone sugar coating that gaffe? I agree that was a pretty boneheaded thing to say, but if I had to pick someone getting a fairly minor historical reference all twisted up, over having essentially nothing to say, when asked a direct question relating to things like the economy and foreign relations I guess I'd lean toward being more forgiving of the former than the latter.
Part of Palin's problem is that so little is known of her that all we have to go off right now, formulating an opinion of her, is almost completely dominated by what little we have seen of her in the past few weeks. For good or bad, Biden is a fairly known quantity, so his latest flub falls within the context of a 25 years record of being a public figure.