LittleAlex
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,824
- Likes
- 54
- Points
- 48
Which would be three strikes and you (Pritchard!) are out, right?
I mean, rebuilding a junk roster into a mid-50s win team with a lot of upside remaining was nice and all, but not using an expiring contract/$8 million cap space is unforgivable and easily nullifies the previous work.
Are the Blazers really better off today then when Pritchard took over? I think it's a good question to ask that no one bothers to due to the "cult of KP."
Sarcasm is awesome!
No, I would say that KP would have a couple of strikes against him that he would have to account for in short order. I don't recall saying he should be fired, unless you are referring to the post about not trading for Devin Harris because the Nets wanted Outlaw.
Who is arguing they aren't better off now? I am saying that KP failed at something. Is that so fucking impossible for people to state? He had one awesome draft, one draft where he lucked out, one draft where his guy hasn't done much and the current draft that no one can really say much about.
Name all of the big time, difference making free agents he has brought in. Name all of the established NBA players (not draft picks) he has traded team assets for. The list is pretty freaking short. Jason Jones maybe. Other then that, nothing.
The jump from playoff team to title contender is at least as difficult and large as the jump from bad team to playoffs. Harder really, since you have less to work with via the draft once your team starts making the playoffs. We all know KP can get a team from bad to playoffs. We don't have the slightest idea if he can close the deal.
What we do know is in two previous instances he had assets he didn't use. Why should I believe anything different will happen now?


