Blazer Fanatic
Suspended
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 4,282
- Likes
- 75
- Points
- 0
Brain's argument getting stomped on like Marshon Lynch into the end-zone. It never gets old.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, you were pretty vehement that it was from the day you posted the OP (the 17th) and even after I pointed it out multiple times you thought passive-aggressive insulting and trolling was the way to go. "Revisionist History in the same thread" LOL. That's actually funny. THanks.Revisionist history even within the same thread? This is new. Right... you're the victim, or "Priestess", who was insulted, and who's opinion is fact, and didn't go out of their way to say LA probably wasn't even the MVP of the Blazers. smh
List the incorrect stats from the stretch between Dec 1st to Jan 15.
Oh, the old "converting to excel" story. I didn't see you reference excel when you were condescendingly pointing out links to nba.com that proved your stats were BS. But congratulations on pointing out your error 350 posts after it was pointed out. Better late than never.I fixed the STAT (singular). His FG% is 1% lower because of a typo I made when converting his game stats to excel,
Well then those "most people" you refer to must not count Jan/Feb 2011 as part of his career, which seems odd to me, but whatever. Keep preaching your narrative and assigning fandom. I'm sure there's an audience somewhere here among the hundreds of members, and it's not my place to edit or censor.and it doesn't diminish or invalidate what most people know to be true: that LA is having the best stretch of his NBA career.
50.1%. You have fixed it. Good job. "Best stretch of his career". I've noticed that you haven't mentioned that yet, or any other of the myriad stats/counterarguments.Please list the statS and incorrect analysis: and go.
No, I never did because i felt sorry for you getting picked on and thought that destroying your made-up stats then would be piling on. You've subsequently added a schtick of condescending, holier-than-thou "31-9!" bullshit that removed any thought of doing that again. I wasn't going to allow you to get away with posting bullshit stats a second time without getting called out for it. My internet chivalry goes only so far.You were going to get back to me a month ago in regards to LA in another thread about LA and never did because he destroyed OKC in Portland. If I made any assumption that was incorrect, it was you had turned the corner on the anti-LA rhetoric.
wait, you just edited the OP without an "edit:" to show you messed up? Even Canzano doesn't do that crap. :smh:
-Ben Golliver
Dwight Howard is damaged goods and a bad chemistry guy. He's a loser. No fucking thanks.Why would you not trade for Dwight?
I'm getting complaints via PM about the personal insults and fighting.
Can everyone please take it down a notch.
Dwight Howard is damaged goods and a bad chemistry guy. He's a loser. No fucking thanks.
I'm getting complaints via PM about the personal insults and fighting.
Can everyone please take it down a notch.
I'm getting complaints via PM about the personal insults and fighting.
Can everyone please take it down a notch.
wait, you just edited the OP without an "edit:" to show you messed up? Even Canzano doesn't do that crap. :smh:
No, I never did because i felt sorry for you getting picked on and thought that destroying your made-up stats then would be piling on. You've subsequently added a schtick of condescending, holier-than-thou "31-9!" bullshit that removed any thought of doing that again. I wasn't going to allow you to get away with posting bullshit stats a second time without getting called out for it.
-Posted to Blazers Edge 5:46PM
Yes, it does, because it's not the best of his career. It's not rocket science. Read some of the other 360+ posts in this thread, and you might learn something.I posted that I was off 1%. And fixed it when I saw the mistake. Does that diminish that LA is having the best performance in his career? No. You chose to nit pick as 1 stat. What compels an individual to do so?
Keep making stuff up if it helps you feel better---I've already been vindicated. Flop and twitch all you like.That stretch, for the games from Dec 1 up to the Cleveland win in Jan (whether that the day of the SA game before the game was played, or the night of the Cavs game after the win).
Because of MULTIPLE stats, but since you've added absolutely nothing to this thread since your incorrect-on-two-levels first post, I don't expect that you've picked up on it.That you seek to be confrontational about even the period I referred to is quite revealing as to you intent. I don't feel sorry for you. You asked to be singled out with a diatribe on a singular stat made devoid of context, and that LA isn't even the MVP of the Blazers because of that stat.
People who don't post how fandom is a religious experience have taken the argument (and counterarguments) seriously, some while disagreeing vehemently. We've discussed them multiple ways, and without stooping to what you have been doing. You seem to be the only one tossing out insults, being condescending while factually incorrect and not adding to the discussion. That trifecta usually is called "trolling", and means that one of us is in much bigger danger of "timeout" than the other.... speaking of bullshit. lol You keep saying made up stats (plural), and you expect your rant to be taken seriously while crying about being insulted, while lobbing more insults. Do you need to be put in time-out?