RR7
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 18,774
- Likes
- 13,280
- Points
- 113
I asked this on RealGM, but wanted to check here as well:
Looking for a little help on Ike's TPE, or maybe TPEs in general. As far as I can tell and see, we have a 2.9 million TPE when we traded Ike. Which means if we wanted to, we can take on any contract amount up to 2.9 million in a trade if we wanted to, is that correct? If we found 3 guys making 900,000, we could in theory trade for all 3 of these players using the TPE?
Unless either leading up to the draft, or before July 1st, we find a player making 2.9 million that we want in a trade, from what I gather, we will haev to renounce the rights to the TPE, since it counts against the cap.
Seems to me, it would be in our interest to find contracts that work up to as close that as possible that we can to trade it for, provided those contracts are similar in nature to the contracts of Blake and Outlaw's, in that they are non-guaranteed deals. If nothing happens before June 30th, you cut those players the same we woudl have waived the TPE, no harm, no foul. But by finding players that equal up to the 2.9 million, it gives us greater flexibility in making a trade around the draft, or right afterwards, basically, before the 2009 cap numbers take effect. Right now, we could trade Blake and Outlaw, essentially 8 million dollars in immediate cap space to a team if they so wished, because they coul waive both of those players before July. We can not, however, combine the TPE with them. We COULD, though, combine the acquired players with them.
Maybe it's a worthless exercise to get me through work, but it allows us to, in a way, have cap space before we ACTUALLY have cap space. If a team is looking to dump a 11 million dollar a year player, without taking any additional salary in return, we would be able to move Blake, outlaw, and whoever to them, and they could subsequently waive those players. It would still leave us with our cap space for the most part intact, minus a few million. If we were to do it after July 1st, we will have already have had to make a decision on Blake and Outlaw, and provided we decided tokeep them both, would limit our flexibility.
Looking for a little help on Ike's TPE, or maybe TPEs in general. As far as I can tell and see, we have a 2.9 million TPE when we traded Ike. Which means if we wanted to, we can take on any contract amount up to 2.9 million in a trade if we wanted to, is that correct? If we found 3 guys making 900,000, we could in theory trade for all 3 of these players using the TPE?
Unless either leading up to the draft, or before July 1st, we find a player making 2.9 million that we want in a trade, from what I gather, we will haev to renounce the rights to the TPE, since it counts against the cap.
Seems to me, it would be in our interest to find contracts that work up to as close that as possible that we can to trade it for, provided those contracts are similar in nature to the contracts of Blake and Outlaw's, in that they are non-guaranteed deals. If nothing happens before June 30th, you cut those players the same we woudl have waived the TPE, no harm, no foul. But by finding players that equal up to the 2.9 million, it gives us greater flexibility in making a trade around the draft, or right afterwards, basically, before the 2009 cap numbers take effect. Right now, we could trade Blake and Outlaw, essentially 8 million dollars in immediate cap space to a team if they so wished, because they coul waive both of those players before July. We can not, however, combine the TPE with them. We COULD, though, combine the acquired players with them.
Maybe it's a worthless exercise to get me through work, but it allows us to, in a way, have cap space before we ACTUALLY have cap space. If a team is looking to dump a 11 million dollar a year player, without taking any additional salary in return, we would be able to move Blake, outlaw, and whoever to them, and they could subsequently waive those players. It would still leave us with our cap space for the most part intact, minus a few million. If we were to do it after July 1st, we will have already have had to make a decision on Blake and Outlaw, and provided we decided tokeep them both, would limit our flexibility.
