Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Grqntlamd Basketball Hor podcast was glorious; the podcast came out yesterday but was recorded on the 23rd. They spent the first ten minutes talking about Westbrook's big opportunity to be the MVP and how his durability will help him out.
The Grqntlamd Basketball Hor podcast was glorious; the podcast came out yesterday but was recorded on the 23rd. They spent the first ten minutes talking about Westbrook's big opportunity to be the MVP and how his durability will help him out.
And that proves what? That Dame is a better player? That Westbrook is being punished by the Gods for totally showing Lillard up for one night?Westbrook sitting on bench with injured hand. Dame healthy and undefeated.
And that proves what? That Dame is a better player? That Westbrook is being punished by the Gods for totally showing Lillard up for one night?
And what will you say if Westbrook comes back strong, and Lillard goes down with an injury? That Lillard is somehow better than Westbrook anyway?
I'm sure he can't. But I'm also pretty sure that Lillard didn't display even half the enthusiasm, energy, athleticism, and dominance that Westbrook did on the Blazer's opening night. It was quite a show.How about we return to this thread in about 20 games and see if Westbrook is still playing at this level? Something tells me he cannot continue to produce like that.
I'm sure he can't. But I'm also pretty sure that Lillard didn't display even half the enthusiasm, energy, athleticism, and dominance that Westbrook did on the Blazer's opening night. It was quite a show.
OK. Westbrook is bigger, faster and stronger than Damian Lillard. He had a referee assisted 'dominant' one half game of basketball against the Blazers. Then he pooped out. In the meantime, Damian played clutch when he needed to, as usual, and came away with the 'W'.I'm sure he can't. But I'm also pretty sure that Lillard didn't display even half the enthusiasm, energy, athleticism, and dominance that Westbrook did on the Blazer's opening night. It was quite a show.

You're joking, right? Westbrook was playing without the league's MVP and possibly the best player in the game--and trying to carry that team to victory. He put up 38 points. How much did you expect him to put up? 50? 60?OK. Westbrook is bigger, faster and stronger than Damian Lillard. He had a referee assisted 'dominant' one half game of basketball against the Blazers. Then he pooped out. In the meantime, Damian played clutch when he needed to, as usual, and came away with the 'W'.
Westbrook outplayed Damian by a big margin in the first half. I'll give you that. Westbrook is today (well, yesterday, before his injury) a better basketball athlete than Damian. I'll give you that.You're joking, right? Westbrook was playing without the league's MVP and possibly the best player in the game--and trying to carry that team to victory. He put up 38 points. How much did you expect him to put up? 50? 60?
Lillard, on the other hand, was playing with a full roster. And he couldn't even stay with Westbrook. Wasn't even in his same league. In fact, he looked totally lost out there in the first half. Yes, Lillard hit a couple of big threes late in the game, but the Blazers were getting contributions from lots of people at that point. Lillard did not make the difference at the end of the game, but Westbrook certainly made the difference through about three quarters.
Look, I love Damian Lillard. I'm a huge fan of his game. I'm behind him all the way. But you have to admit he looked thoroughly outclassed by Westbrook for most of that game. It was actually kind of shocking to see.

If Lilliard was playing without LaMarcus and Wes, then measuring Lilliard's numbers against Westbrook would be a fair comparison. Roles matter. Lillard was running a team. Westbrook was a team.You're joking, right? Westbrook was playing without the league's MVP and possibly the best player in the game--and trying to carry that team to victory. He put up 38 points. How much did you expect him to put up? 50? 60?
Lillard, on the other hand, was playing with a full roster. And he couldn't even stay with Westbrook. Wasn't even in his same league. In fact, he looked totally lost out there in the first half. Yes, Lillard hit a couple of big threes late in the game, but the Blazers were getting contributions from lots of people at that point. Lillard did not make the difference at the end of the game, but Westbrook certainly made the difference through about three quarters.
Look, I love Damian Lillard. I'm a huge fan of his game. I'm behind him all the way. But you have to admit he looked thoroughly outclassed by Westbrook for most of that game. It was actually kind of shocking to see.
If Lilliard was playing without LaMarcus and Wes, then measuring Lilliard's numbers against Westbrook would be a fair comparison. Roles matter. Lillard was running a team. Westbrook was a team.
I know, right?There ya go, making sense again. Knock that shit off.
Yep, half of this board is desperately trying to argue that Lillard is better than Westbrook, no matter what the "facts" said the other night.that moment where someone takes a stance on something, and can never let it go, no matter the facts....
I'm a huge Blazer fan. I've just never understood why being a fan means you can't tell the truth about one of your own players. Lillard is special, but he got taken to school in every which way by Russell Westbrook the other night. Big deal. It happened, and now it's over. Life goes on. Lillard will get better. The Blazers will win a lot of games this year. We'll all have a lot of fun. Life is good.As tough as it is to say, westchuck is viewed as superior by pretty much everyone except blazer fans.
But we are all blazer fans so gtfo with this shit
Yep, half of this board is desperately trying to argue that Lillard is better than Westbrook, no matter what the "facts" said the other night.
Yep, half of this board is desperately trying to argue that Lillard is better than Westbrook, no matter what the "facts" said the other night.
I'm a huge Blazer fan. I've just never understood why being a fan means you can't tell the truth about one of your own players. Lillard is special, but he got taken to school in every which by Russell Westbrook the other night. Big deal. It happened, and now it's over. Life goes on. Lillard will get better. The Blazers will win a lot of games this year. We'll all have a lot of fun. Life is good.
Yes, it usually does. But I didn't see a lot of team ball from the Blazers. I saw us missing a lot of shots through most of the game, and then finally heating up in the fourth quarter. To be honest, OKC was moving the ball better than we were most of the night. We just finally got untracked late in the game, hit some big shots, and got our confidence up.Team ball trumps ballhog ball.
Yes, Lillard had an "off" first half, but he also couldn't stop Westbrook to save his life. That's not being "off," that's being incapable of guarding a guy.Lillard had an off 1st half. So what.
Yes, and I'm happy about that. The Blazers won, and we got to see an amazing performance by Westbrook.We had a lot of guys contributing and in the end we blew them out.
Yes, it usually does. But I didn't see a lot of team ball from the Blazers. I saw us missing a lot of shots through most of the game, and then finally heating up in the fourth quarter. To be honest, OKC was moving the ball better than we were most of the night. We just finally got untracked late in the game, hit some big shots, and got our confidence up.
Yes, Lillard had an "off" first half, but he also couldn't stop Westbrook to save his life. That's not being "off," that's being incapable of guarding a guy.
Yes, and I'm happy about that. The Blazers won, and we got to see an amazing performance by Westbrook.
It wasn't an amazing performance.
parts of it were. but not that second half.
parts of it were. but not that second half.
