blazerboy30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 5,465
- Likes
- 423
- Points
- 83
At the time the criticism was fair, he just wasn't that good. Then we found out that it was 4 years of Roy's ISO ball that was really holding him back.
Criticism is a lot different than claiming something and being completely wrong.
People were claiming the following:
1) He just wasn't that good
2) He had played for 4 years, and hadn't improved... thus he wouldn't improve.
Combining those two means those people thought he wasn't that good, and never would be very good.
They were wrong.
Those criticizing LMA for playing outside too much, or playing too soft, or not developing his left hand were correct.


