"Information" sites (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

...remember when Blazersland.com was the go to site for unique, one-of-a-kind legit articles? :dunno: Awwwhhhhh to remember the times before this summer's writers strike and before the editor in chief (50% shareholder) bonked his head...the good ole days!
 
...remember when Blazersland.com was the go to site for unique, one-of-a-kind legit articles? :dunno: Awwwhhhhh to remember the times before this summer's writers strike and before the editor in chief (50% shareholder) bonked his head...the good ole days!
Awwww I teared up :'(
 
...remember when Blazersland.com was the go to site for unique, one-of-a-kind legit articles? :dunno: Awwwhhhhh to remember the times before this summer's writers strike and before the editor in chief (50% shareholder) bonked his head...the good ole days!
Actually I don't. I was having sex with real human women and had a social life that summer.
 
It works for presidential candidates. Fake News >>> Facts, all day every day, these days.

Thanks, internet.

That did crack me up. President Obama giving an interview and complaining about fake news.....while being interviewed by a magazine that just got sued for fake news. That was a head scratcher.
 
If you Google rumors...do you really expect to get facts?
 
Lately there is more and more topics based on random websites. "www.hngn.com" or stuff like that. I would be more than pleased if you could read this very well documented article about this trend that is terrible for tracking the news on the web at the moment.

www.sbnation.com/nba/2016/11/15/13629660/nba-trade-rumors-fake-news-klay-thompson
I think of rumor as...well...rumor..and actually it seems that the only real leak in the NBA that ever bears fruit is the Woj tweet just before it happens...GMs can spread rumors as a distraction also. We've recently found reputable websites spinning false rumors (the election campaign comes to mind_) as well so to me....rumors aren't fake news...they're just rumors...conversation pieces...I assume nobody gives them much weight until Woj breaks the news....
 
I googled around once to find out more about the person who wrote one of those ridiculous fake articles, and it turned out to be some dude in the Philippines writing about trade rumors (probably made up out of thin air) on his own website and, then he would tweet out his own fake stories. I'm not positive but it may have been that one called "sportsrageous". It just seems he was trying to become internet famous by mimicking the other twitter famous NBA and celebrity gossip types.
 
I googled around once to find out more about the person who wrote one of those ridiculous fake articles, and it turned out to be some dude in the Philippines writing about trade rumors (probably made up out of thin air) on his own website and, then he would tweet out his own fake stories. I'm not positive but it may have been that one called "sportsrageous". It just seems he was trying to become internet famous by mimicking the other twitter famous NBA and celebrity gossip types.
Sportrageous, Inquisitr, Parent Herald, Hngn, they all work off each other. One said will pass a trade suggestion off as a legit rumor or bound to happen move, then the other 3 will copy it and use it as their "source".

The more fake sites report the same bullshit trade "rumor", the more legit it looks and the more people buy into it.
 
Sportrageous, Inquisitr, Parent Herald, Hngn, they all work off each other. One said will pass a trade suggestion off as a legit rumor or bound to happen move, then the other 3 will copy it and use it as their "source".

The more fake sites report the same bullshit trade "rumor", the more legit it looks and the more people buy into it.
that's also why when you google say, "bedroom design ideas" you'll get articles like "13 best bedroom designs" "15 best masculine bedroom designs" "18 cheap ideas to design a bedroom" and they will all have the same fucking images. and they use a fake source for the image or reference each other. it's called click bait and it's taken over the media. People don't even write the articles it's all computer generated to copy each other It's why i can't fucking stand any news and just live by the ostrich principal and live with my head under the fucking sand. It all boils down to advertisement money. Now these websites even check for your pop up blocker and demand you disable the pop up blocker to view their site. why? because they need that fucking ad money. I can't stand fucking advertisements. fucking Idiocracy the movie was so accurate it's scary.

idiocracy.jpg
 
Sportrageous, Inquisitr, Parent Herald, Hngn, they all work off each other. One said will pass a trade suggestion off as a legit rumor or bound to happen move, then the other 3 will copy it and use it as their "source".

The more fake sites report the same bullshit trade "rumor", the more legit it looks and the more people buy into it.

Fansided is/was another ridiculous site for made up nonsense. It's what Bleacher Report used to be (when we used to all say, "Bleacher Report, lol". The articles are/were written by unpaid fans seeking their 15 minutes of internet fame. The articles are absolutely not fact checked, or even proofread.

Of course, that's how Bleacher Report started out, but they were bought by Turner Sports for $170 million in 2012 and are now a legitimate site with paid contributors. Which, I believe, has led to the proliferation of "content farm" web sites seeking to cash n in the same way Bleacher Report did. Here's some quotes from wikipedia about the early days of Bleacher Report:

"Early criticism of Bleacher Report stemmed from the network's initial commitment to an open publishing model. Such critiques cited the fact that all registered users on the website were permitted to publish articles on the site, arguing that Bleacher Reports policy resulted in a glut of low-quality content, which made it difficult for the network's readers to find credible coverage of their favorite teams and sports.[22] It was also argued that the model tarnished the reputation of every writer associated with the Bleacher Report brand, which made it difficult for the network's more talented contributors to build loyal audiences,[23] and that it empowered unqualified writers without editorial oversight, which compromised the prestige and credibility of the sportswriting profession.[24] SB Nation Senior MMA editor Luke Thomas described it as the "Walmart of Journalism" and it's MMA coverage "toothless amateur coverage".[25]

Since abandoning the content farm model in 2010, Bleacher Report has been the subject of continued criticism for its exploitation of unpaid contributors, its blanket policy prohibiting writers from breaking their own news, and its high-volume production of low-quality, search-optimized slideshow content.[26][27] These critiques found their strongest voice to date in an October 2012 SF Weekly article, in which tech columnist and entrepreneur Vivek Wadhwa was quoted accusing Bleacher Report of "dumbing down of the web" with "custom-manufactured garbage."[27] In December 2012, a lampoon article in The Onion played on the same themes.[28] In July 2014, Deadspin published a lengthy narrative written by Tom Schreier - a former Bleacher Report featured columnist.[29] Detailing his journey from hopeful intern to "just one more drone pumping content to get clicked on," in three years, Schreier "wrote over 500 articles, generated nearly three million page views, and received $200 for [his] services."[30]"

Fansided was bought by Time. Inc, earlier this year, following in the Beacher Report model, but their content still sucks. Plus a lot of their articles are linked by legitimate web sites like basketball-reference. Those are probably paid links to help increase their audience and lend an air of credibility to their enterprise. Unfortunately, it's not always obvious that the links lead to shitty, made up bullshit generated by Fansided contributors. Based on the wildly variable quality of their articles, they appear to use a combination of paid writers and unpaid (or grossly underpaid) wannabees. They hide behind a bunch of other domain names (like All U Can Heat, The Smoking Cuban, Rip City Project, etc. over 300 of them in all). You also can't find anything about Fansided on Wikipedia. A Wikipedia search for Fansided redirects you to the Time, Inc. entry, but the only mentions of Fansided are about their acquisition by Time, Inc. It doesn't seem like they are too proud of their new step child.

BNM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top