Injuries

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Seems like there are a lot of injuries league wide...wonder why that is :dunno:
 
I think the NBA needs to expand the number of players on a roster given the length of the season and raise the salary cap to accommodate having say, 20 players on a roster instead of being only 3 deep or so at any given position.The chance that two 7 ft bigs get injured in the same season is pretty high.
 
Do today's players lack toughness? It seems like every ticky tack injury leads to extended absences. A tweeked ankle leads to missing a month. I sprained finger means surgery and 3 months out. A smacked knee leads to season ending surgery. I don't remember it being like this. Are teams just more careful with every little thing, or did players used to play through more stuff and heal as they went along?
 
Do today's players lack toughness? It seems like every ticky tack injury leads to extended absences. A tweeked ankle leads to missing a month. I sprained finger means surgery and 3 months out. A smacked knee leads to season ending surgery. I don't remember it being like this. Are teams just more careful with every little thing, or did players used to play through more stuff and heal as they went along?
I think teams now take the longer view - playing injured players is OK ONLY if it's a critical/playoff game. e.g. the Suns know they are going to make the playoffs, even if things are rough now. So, doing what they can to have the old men healthy come playoffs means much more than a meaningless regular season game.

This actually makes much more sense than "give him a cortisol shot, and send him back in..."
 
Seems like there are a lot of injuries league wide...wonder why that is :dunno:
Just the conspiracy theorist in me but I might assume this has something to do with the new rules. If they can document a nagging lingering injury then the rest days have no effect on the team or players.
 
Do today's players lack toughness? It seems like every ticky tack injury leads to extended absences. A tweeked ankle leads to missing a month. I sprained finger means surgery and 3 months out. A smacked knee leads to season ending surgery. I don't remember it being like this. Are teams just more careful with every little thing, or did players used to play through more stuff and heal as they went along?
Players union has had some say in this. Also if we are paying attention to what has happened to the NFL and the many lawsuits they have dealt with I would assume the NBA has changed it's stance as well on players playing injured and the way they handle injuries. It certainly has happened with concussions obviously.
 
I think the NBA needs to expand the number of players on a roster given the length of the season and raise the salary cap to accommodate having say, 20 players on a roster instead of being only 3 deep or so at any given position.The chance that two 7 ft bigs get injured in the same season is pretty high.

Says a Blazer fan. Ha!
 
I think the NBA needs to expand the number of players on a roster given the length of the season and raise the salary cap to accommodate having say, 20 players on a roster instead of being only 3 deep or so at any given position.The chance that two 7 ft bigs get injured in the same season is pretty high.
I doubt the owners want to do that and they have within the last seven years expanded teams from 14 players with no two way contracts to 15 players with 3 two way contracts. Two ways should work as the type of insurance that you're asking for.

Injuries will always be a part of the game. If we had two more scrubs on the roster we'd be no better off and we aren't set up to withstand very many injuries because we aren't even trying to win.
 
Whatever the status quo is it clearly isn't working. Injuries often are because you have to play Malcom Brogdan 46 minutes a game which contributes to injuries. As many games as there are, they should be able to carry 4 deep at every position in my view. Baseball teams don't carry only two pitchers through a season for a reason. They don't want the left fielder pitching the last inning more than likely.
 
I think teams now take the longer view - playing injured players is OK ONLY if it's a critical/playoff game. e.g. the Suns know they are going to make the playoffs, even if things are rough now. So, doing what they can to have the old men healthy come playoffs means much more than a meaningless regular season game.

This actually makes much more sense than "give him a cortisol shot, and send him back in..."
What old men have been resting for the Suns? KD has been playing. Also- playoffs are guaranteed for no one.
 
Do today's players lack toughness? It seems like every ticky tack injury leads to extended absences. A tweeked ankle leads to missing a month. I sprained finger means surgery and 3 months out. A smacked knee leads to season ending surgery. I don't remember it being like this. Are teams just more careful with every little thing, or did players used to play through more stuff and heal as they went along?
Back in the day, ownership only paid Clyde Drexler a million dollars a year; everyone is paid a lot more money now, and so both management and the players have a lot more on the line when they get injured.
 
You should see how the players that played “back in the day” walk around. They look like they should be in an old folks home. It’s sad actually. If you think a player is not “tough” if they don’t play with torn ligaments and tendons….not sure what to tell you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top