Is it crazy to consider trading for Eric Gordon?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Chuck Taylor

BATUUUM SHAKKA LAKKA!
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
1,183
Likes
21
Points
38
I get that Gordon's had injury concerns. Then again, so has Stephen Curry, and he's the darling of the NBA right now. The last time Gordon played the bulk of a season, he had a 22 PER. No one on our team has EVER had a 22 PER.

The Pelicans (ha!) have already said they are open to trading him. I think something like Wes and the 10 pick plus filler might just do the trick.

We need to acquire assets, and we probably need to take some risks to become a elite team. Flirting with the playoffs and/or being one and done just doesn't cut it for me. This is one high risk/reward that is pretty obtainable. But is it smart? Thoughts?
 
I get that Gordon's had injury concerns. Then again, so has Stephen Curry, and he's the darling of the NBA right now. The last time Gordon played the bulk of a season, he had a 22 PER. No one on our team has EVER had a 22 PER.

The Pelicans (ha!) have already said they are open to trading him. I think something like Wes and the 10 pick plus filler might just do the trick.

We need to acquire assets, and we probably need to take some risks to become a elite team. Flirting with the playoffs and/or being one and done just doesn't cut it for me. This is one high risk/reward that is pretty obtainable. But is it smart? Thoughts?

Am I blind? I thought Lamarcus had a 22.7 PER 2011-2012?
 
Whoops! I was looking at PTS, not PER. So Gordon really had a 18.5 PER. Still really good. Still pretty interesting, IMO.
 
His knees would keep me away.

MF surgery was a real option last summer. He opted for rest and missed a ton of games last year. Outside the shortened season he has misses at least 20 games/per since his rookie year.
 
His knees would keep me away.

MF surgery was a real option last summer. He opted for rest and missed a ton of games last year. Outside the shortened season he has misses at least 20 games/per since his rookie year.

Agreed. He is also on a MAX contract. Put it this way if we strike out in FA I'd offer joel freeland for Gordon and Lopez. That's how much of a hindrance I think his contract is.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 
15 mil ave for the next 3 years is just too much IMO. I would rather take a chance on Monte Ellis. He attacks the basket a little better. Although I have soured on Ellis too.
 
15 mil ave for the next 3 years is just too much IMO. I would rather take a chance on Monte Ellis. He attacks the basket a little better. Although I have soured on Ellis too.

Yeah, Ellis is interesting. You kinda sub out injury risk and take on a headcase. I'd almost prefer the injury risk.
 
No. He was decent for Clippers with what appeared to be a bright future but now he's injured and expensive. Not to mention he's short and I don't want two short people in our backcourt. Those are my thoughts.
 
No. He was decent for Clippers with what appeared to be a bright future but now he's injured and expensive. Not to mention he's short and I don't want two short people in our backcourt. Those are my thoughts.

Lillard is not short for a PG. So basically you would only have the sg that would be too short. Sad part of that is when other teams use two short guards against us.......we can't make them pay. As long as Wes stands out 22 feet from the basket and rarely attacks, then a midget can guard him.
 
No. He was decent for Clippers with what appeared to be a bright future but now he's injured and expensive. Not to mention he's short and I don't want two short people in our backcourt. Those are my thoughts.

Granted, he is overpaid. But that's a big part of why he's available. If we want to lure a big time FA here, we're probably going to have to overpay for him, too. Not to say that you should ignore salary - obviously, you shouldn't. But this could be the type of contact that gets dumped in a trade. Maybe we could get him for next to nothing?
 
Granted, he is overpaid. But that's a big part of why he's available. If we want to lure a big time FA here, we're probably going to have to overpay for him, too. Not to say that you should ignore salary - obviously, you shouldn't. But this could be the type of contact that gets dumped in a trade. Maybe we could get him for next to nothing?

We don't need expensive shooting guards with a long history of injury problems.

That means no Eric Gordon.

That means no Kevin Martin.
 
I'd consider it, solely because if he was healthy he would push our team over the top.

Keyword, CONSIDER.

Also, I think it would be tough to watch a player where every time he grabs a knee or ankle you think he is done for, exactly what we are seeing with Steve Curry right now.
 
I drove the Gordon bandwagon a few years ago but he certainly looks like he's falling apart.

I'd like a shooter/scorer next to Lillard, which is why I'm so high on McCollum.

Or a defender like Shumpert or Bradley.
 
I drove the Gordon bandwagon a few years ago but he certainly looks like he's falling apart.

I'd like a shooter/scorer next to Lillard, which is why I'm so high on McCollum.

Or a defender like Shumpert or Bradley.

Defense wins championships. With that said, if we could pair McCollum next to Lillard for a couple years and drive up his value into a trading piece for a more defensive minded SG + other pieces, I'd be all for it. I'm not big on the miniature backcourts (Jennings, Ellis) although we have LMA. I'd probably rather sign someone like Tyreke or trade Wes + 10 for a solid SG.

Or somehow land Gordon Hayward or Lance Stephenson.
 
Defense wins championships. With that said, if we could pair McCollum next to Lillard for a couple years and drive up his value into a trading piece for a more defensive minded SG + other pieces, I'd be all for it. I'm not big on the miniature backcourts (Jennings, Ellis) although we have LMA. I'd probably rather sign someone like Tyreke or trade Wes + 10 for a solid SG.

Or somehow land Gordon Hayward or Lance Stephenson.

Bradley has Tony Allen potential and has shown flashes of that.
 
I would certainly consider Gordon (and NOT Kevin Martin or OJ Mayo) because when he plays he is a genuine difference maker. HOWEVER: given the injury history, it would have to be a bargain - i.e., them unloading his contract. I would throw in the #10 but not Wesley, because we need his grit. (But then again, we'd pretty much have to include Wes because he's our tradeable sizeable contract.)

If we can just absorb his salary, then sure, I would consider him a free agent.
 
Whitsitt and Pritchard come to mind here. Both were risk takers, acquiring talent at bargain prices. The difference is, Whitsitt went for lottery talent at any cost ... literally. He would pick up anyone that was too expensive for their team to afford, but they were always consistent contributors. Meanwhile, Pritchard went for the talent that slid mostly due to health issues. That blew up in his face. So did Whitsitt's approach, eventually, but at least it got us close to the promised land. Gordon would be closer to repeating Prtichard's plan of attack.
 
Whitsitt and Pritchard come to mind here. Both were risk takers, acquiring talent at bargain prices. The difference is, Whitsitt went for lottery talent at any cost ... literally. He would pick up anyone that was too expensive for their team to afford, but they were always consistent contributors. Meanwhile, Pritchard went for the talent that slid mostly due to health issues. That blew up in his face. So did Whitsitt's approach, eventually, but at least it got us close to the promised land. Gordon would be closer to repeating Prtichard's plan of attack.

I dunno: it might be a combination. I get the impression that a lot of Gordon's problems are from the fact that he never wanted to be traded to New Orleans. If he gets unloaded it'll be because they actively dislike him, not because they're giving up on him for being oft-injured.
 
Here is an article before this year's trade deadline. (He just had another arthroscopic surgery on his ankle yetserday, although minor in nature the trend is alarming for a 24 year old max player)


http://www.bourbonstreetshots.com/2013/02/18/an-outline-of-eric-gordons-injury-history/
2008-09 Season (78 out of 82 games)
February 2009 (4 games) – Bruised left shoulder
2009-10 Season (62 out of 82 games)
November 2009 (8 games) – Strained groin
December 2009 (1 game) – Precautionary (hamstring tightness)
January 2010 (3 games) – Sprained left big toe
March 2010 (5 games) – Groin injury
April 2010 (3 games) – Viral infection (final 3 games of the season; Clippers tanking?)
2010-11 Season (56 out of 82 games)
November 2010 (2 games) – Bruised left shoulder
January 2011 (18 games) – Right wrist bone chip fracture (which he played through for 17 minutes after first suffering the injury)
March 2011(6 games) – Re-injury to right wrist
2011-12 Season (9 out of 66 games)
December 2011 (57 games) – Right knee injury
2012-13 Season (18 out of 53 games)
October 2012 (29 games) – Right knee injury
January 2013 (5 games) – Rest (back-to-back games)
February 2013 (1 game) – Sprained right hand (precautionary due to prior wrist injury)

So to break things down, he has missed games because of:
Hamstring tightness (1)
Sprained left big toe (2)
Left shoulder bruise (6)
Precautionary/rest/sickness (10)
Strained groin (13)
Right wrist/hand injury (24)
Right knee injury (86)

The goal of this outline is not to push fans in one way or the other in regards to their opinions regarding Eric Gordon’s future in New Orleans, but merely to make them aware of what has ailed Gordon throughout his 4 1/2 year NBA career.
While it could certainly be argued that the first three listed injuries indicate some fragility, the only three injuries that stand out to me as cause for concern are the bottom three – his groin, right wrist, and right knee. It is pretty clear that the Hornets feel the same way, evidenced by Gordon’s late scratch from the lineup on Wednesday night. The team held him out with an injured hand despite his desire to play simply because it was near his previous right wrist injury.
Personally, I am not against trading Gordon, but I am against doing so before Thursday’s trade deadline, and I think the Hornets share this stance. As Rohan Cruyff from At the Hive mentioned on Friday, barring another major injury, I fail to see how Gordon’s trade value could sink much lower than it stands right now. Given the data above, I think that the approach of assuming he will sustain another devastating injury over the next 29 games is an overly paranoid one. By not playing Gordon in the second game of back-to-backs as well as holding him out of games purely as a precaution, the Hornets are clearly taking the most conservative approach that they can in order to ensure his long-term health. If team management decides that it would prefer to deal Eric Gordon, that is fine, but unless some unexpectedly great offer presents itself in the next 72 hours, I believe that waiting until the summer (at the earliest) is the team’s best option.
 
Gordon would be a huge mistake. He's way too injury prone. He's definitely a talent, but we need someone we can count on for most the season.
 
Gordon hates olshey. Not sure he would be any happier in Portland.
 
Whoops! I was looking at PTS, not PER. So Gordon really had a 18.5 PER. Still really good. Still pretty interesting, IMO.

Career PER of 15.8
Career USG of 23.9, with it being 29+ the last two seasons

He's an inefficient scorer who doesn't defend, and is on a terrible contract. I'd rather keep Barton as the back-up SG.
 
I've always been a Gordon doubter because he's a very short SG, and those are normally terrible. But his effect on New Orleans when he plays is pretty amazing. They're useless without him but very competitive with him. I wouldn't give up any rotation players to get him, but if New Orleans just wants to unload his contract, then I say go for it. That's how Golden State got Baron Davis, and Memphis got Zach Randolph.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top