Science Is Trump actually losing mental competence? (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Yeah, like they did for 8 years with Bill Clinton......

Republicans did not try to nullify the election result, claim Clinton was illegitimate, etc.

They investigated him and his wife, just as they're doing to his wife now and Trump and his associates. Investigating is what Republicans do.

They also did work with him and passed legislation Clinton wanted and signed.
 
Republicans did not try to nullify the election result, claim Clinton was illegitimate, etc.

They investigated him and his wife, just as they're doing to his wife now and Trump and his associates. Investigating is what Republicans do.

They also did work with him and passed legislation Clinton wanted and signed.
Well some of the R's (like the current POTUS), claimed Obama was illegitimate. I don't think anyone tried to nullify the election result except for that wacko Green Party candidate Jill Stein and maybe some D's had wishful thinking on that one. Denny, let's be fair, ever since Bill Clinton became president each side of the aisle has tried to demonize the other, particularly when Congress and POTUS are controlled by different parties. This is true of both parties. The main difference is that Trump makes it so easy with his very bizarre behavior and tweeting. Also, it is a little surprising to me that the R's just don't seem that united. They have had a long time to develop plans to address health care, taxes, spending, before 2016 and I would have expected that they had a more solid plan than what we have seen so far. I don't know how fervently they are investigating Trump and his associates. I mean, there was the whole Nunes not so secret leaking of info to WH. So, yes, they may be investigating Russia (which they should because we all know Trump and Putin are not going to get along and I'm sure Putin would love to cause chaos in the 2020 election). They may somewhat be investigating Trump and his associates, but you certainly wouldn't know it by listening to their questions of witnesses during public hearings. I'm not sure the point you are trying to make here. I think you want them to abandon the Russia investigation and work on other substantive issues, but I think the quicker they complete their investigation, and make their findings, the better for all. The investigation is important. Get it right. Get it done efficiently. Move on. Trump would be wise to just stay out of the whole Russia mess and try to focus on his agenda. However, his agenda seems to be to watch Fox & Friends, MSNBC, CNN and fight with people on the internet. While he would seem to fit right in at S2, I think we should all expect more from our President.
 
Well some of the R's (like the current POTUS), claimed Obama was illegitimate. I don't think anyone tried to nullify the election result except for that wacko Green Party candidate Jill Stein and maybe some D's had wishful thinking on that one. Denny, let's be fair, ever since Bill Clinton became president each side of the aisle has tried to demonize the other, particularly when Congress and POTUS are controlled by different parties. This is true of both parties. The main difference is that Trump makes it so easy with his very bizarre behavior and tweeting. Also, it is a little surprising to me that the R's just don't seem that united. They have had a long time to develop plans to address health care, taxes, spending, before 2016 and I would have expected that they had a more solid plan than what we have seen so far. I don't know how fervently they are investigating Trump and his associates. I mean, there was the whole Nunes not so secret leaking of info to WH. So, yes, they may be investigating Russia (which they should because we all know Trump and Putin are not going to get along and I'm sure Putin would love to cause chaos in the 2020 election). They may somewhat be investigating Trump and his associates, but you certainly wouldn't know it by listening to their questions of witnesses during public hearings. I'm not sure the point you are trying to make here. I think you want them to abandon the Russia investigation and work on other substantive issues, but I think the quicker they complete their investigation, and make their findings, the better for all. The investigation is important. Get it right. Get it done efficiently. Move on. Trump would be wise to just stay out of the whole Russia mess and try to focus on his agenda. However, his agenda seems to be to watch Fox & Friends, MSNBC, CNN and fight with people on the internet. While he would seem to fit right in at S2, I think we should all expect more from our President.

It goes back to Thomas Jefferson vs. John Adams.

There's a difference between calling the republican presidents stupid (the "stupid" ones won reelection) and driving to impeach from day 1. That is new.

Even with Obama and republicans, they didn't get along, but for the first 2 years, the republicans didn't obstruct.
 
There's a difference between calling the republican presidents stupid (the "stupid" ones won reelection) and driving to impeach from day 1. That is new.

There is no impeachment process going on.

Even with Obama and republicans, they didn't get along, but for the first 2 years, the republicans didn't obstruct.

Only because they didn't have the power to do so. The same reason the democrats are not capable of obstructing now.

barfo
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html?utm_term=.528901a7ea91

When did McConnell say he wanted to make Obama a ‘one-term president’?

“When I first came into office, the head of the Senate Republicans said, ‘my number one priority is making sure president Obama’s a one-term president.’ Now, after the election, either he will have succeeded in that goal or he will have failed at that goal.”

— President Obama, interview on CBS’ “60 Minutes,” recorded on Sept. 12, 2012, and aired on Sept. 23


The Facts

McConnell made his remarks in an interview that appeared in the National Journal on Oct. 23, 2010 — nearly two years after Obama was elected president. The interview took place on the eve the of the midterm elections.
 
Apparently Trump is not competent enough to book a hotel in Hamburg for the G20 summit...completely forgot ...he's used to having his own hotel perks laid out for him and for a guy who builds hotels all over the globe, sadly has no hotel in Germany...they're putting him up in the Senate house and the staff in the consulate I believe.....what an entrance eh? Who's getting fired for this snaffoo?
 
Apparently Trump is not competent enough to book a hotel

I would be embarrassed for a man that would type this. But I know you enjoy it. Why is question neither of us can answer.
 
I would be embarrassed for a man in the hotel business to attend a global summit and not have booked accommodations ahead of time, especially a world leader but strangely enough I enjoy it. Why is question neither of us can answer.
fixed
 
I don't mean that metaphorically. I mean that literally. Some people (many!) have pointed out that if you look at transcripts from interviews of him like ten years ago, it's night and day to what he's like now. And one thing they've pointed out is that he tends to say "out loud" things that you're not supposed to, that may be the REASON why you're where you are doing what you're doing, but not the reason you're supposed to let the public know. Examples:



I mean... did you watch the interview with ABC News last night? He did not look like a well man. And even if he still has the mannerisms and tone of a salesman that he always had (the saying "believe me" a million times), it gets even worse if you look at transcripts of what he's saying. They really do look like the ramblings of someone in a nursing home.


Also, he has these obsessions that he keeps circling back to. I have old relatives and they do the same. They'll call up and ask you something and you'll say "no, that was last week" or "no, because...." and they'll say oh, okay. Then the next day it's back and they're calling with the same question. Same with his crazy "illegals" talk.

Now, I know Sly is going to say "crazy like a fox!" because this takes up airtime and in the meantime, POW, the New Deal has been totally demolished. Maybe. Certainly his aides have figured out they can ride this wave to their own advantage (which is scary, because he's doing the bidding of Steve Bannon and that guy straight from central casting call for "Evil Slimebag", Jason Miller,
Stephen-Miller-Nevada-Rally-Getty-640x480.jpg


who keep filling his speeches with Nazi rhetoric (and Bane quotes)) but I think it's EVEN MORE WORRYING THAN THAT.



I've not heard Trump say anything that was like a Nazi. But I have noticed that something is different about him now compared to interviews of him when he was younger. He seemed more grounded and intelligent back then, whereas now he seems to talk in cliques.
 
He was obviously an asshole even back then. But he was an asshole who could string together a complete sentence.

barfo
One thing is a constant: everything is judged by how much money you can get for it. The sculptures being destroyed was okay because you couldn't sell them for much.

He had kind of a high voice, didn't he? And he never really looked comfortable in his own skin.
 
He had kind of a high voice, didn't he? And he never really looked comfortable in his own skin.

There should be rule against posting this sort of drivel incessantly. Mindless traffic from too many, too often.
 
There should be rule against posting this sort of drivel incessantly. Mindless traffic from too many, too often.
It is America. We can talk trash about him all we want. If you don't like it, then you can get out (I don't really mean that, I have just always wanted to say it).
 
umm, I wonder how the many recognized the mindless so quickly? :cool2:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top