The_Lillard_King
Westside
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 12,405
- Likes
- 310
- Points
- 83
Sweet . . . and I really don't know how much he will add. But here is what I like:
1) A player choose less money to play in Ptd. Usually it takes PA outbidding all otehr teams or PA willing to take on a bad contract to get a decent player here
2) it show PA is not entirely in the tear it down and and rebuild mode. Instead of takling on a bunch of young players, lettting them play and see who emerges, he wants proven players in hopes of this team getting better now
3) We got him on the cheap . . . I know that is the same as 1, but Indy offered him same deal he said no, Sac offered him more than we did . . . so at least two other GMs think he is worth the money (and no doubt NYK would offer 5 mil per year if they had it).
Now can we steal Landry away . . . do we have another 5 million per year for 4 years to offer?
1) A player choose less money to play in Ptd. Usually it takes PA outbidding all otehr teams or PA willing to take on a bad contract to get a decent player here
2) it show PA is not entirely in the tear it down and and rebuild mode. Instead of takling on a bunch of young players, lettting them play and see who emerges, he wants proven players in hopes of this team getting better now
3) We got him on the cheap . . . I know that is the same as 1, but Indy offered him same deal he said no, Sac offered him more than we did . . . so at least two other GMs think he is worth the money (and no doubt NYK would offer 5 mil per year if they had it).
Now can we steal Landry away . . . do we have another 5 million per year for 4 years to offer?
