Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hamilton and Ginobili got "winner" boosts. I don't think any GM in basketball would rather have Hamilton or Ginobili over Roy.
Kobe, Wade, TMac and Johnson are the only ones I'd place ahead of Roy. I certainly wouldn't take Iverson ahead of Roy.
The thing about these kinds of lists is that they might not be consistent with what GMs would take, or what we as fans would want... because Iverson might be better for one game (or for the upcoming season) than Roy, but he makes so much more money and is so much older that few, if any GMs, would prefer him to Roy.
I think most of us who post here have a longer term perspective than lists like this one that are just a current "snapshot". This is further reinforced for us Blazers fans because we have had precious little to be excited about without a heavy dash of "wait 'til next year" attitude.
Of course, personally, I would take Roy over Iverson for the immediate term, too, but I've never been an Iverson fan.
You are just a hater.The thing about these kinds of lists is that they might not be consistent with what GMs would take, or what we as fans would want... because Iverson might be better for one game (or for the upcoming season) than Roy, but he makes so much more money and is so much older that few, if any GMs, would prefer him to Roy.
I think most of us who post here have a longer term perspective than lists like this one that are just a current "snapshot". This is further reinforced for us Blazers fans because we have had precious little to be excited about without a heavy dash of "wait 'til next year" attitude.
Of course, personally, I would take Roy over Iverson for the immediate term, too, but I've never been an Iverson fan.
Ed O.
Hamilton and Ginobili got "winner" boosts. I don't think any GM in basketball would rather have Hamilton or Ginobili over Roy.
Kobe, Wade, TMac and Johnson are the only ones I'd place ahead of Roy. I certainly wouldn't take Iverson ahead of Roy.
I think Ed pretty much nailed it. Long term Roy would likely be a bit higher, but for the short term I don't think it's unreasonable to have most those guys above Roy. Roy has proven a lot less then them, and it's not like he's being snubbed under Jason Jennings or something. There's no doubt in my mind that a list with an eye towards going the future would have him placed higher.

Foulzilla! Agreeing with me in one of your first two posts.
You're off to an excellent start!
Ed O.
As much as I like Roy, Joe Johnson is bigger, quicker, and unstoppable as a scorer, and at least equal as a ballhandler and distributor.
For the lazy ones:
1-Kobe
2-Wade
3-McGrady
4-Ginobli
5-Joe Johnson
6-Iverson
7-Hamilton
8-Roy
9-Vince
10-Ray Allen
since when does putting up a few 50 point games really mean anything? it's better to consistently put up good numbers than to occasionally put up great ones.Roy's injury history isn't stellar, either. Given the roster situation last year after Oden's injury, you'd think Roy would have put up a few 50 point games. He probably will when he's fully matured as a player.
He's awesome already, though. I just picked him up in the 2nd round in a fantasy draft, to go with LeBron.
As much as I like Roy, Joe Johnson is bigger, quicker, and unstoppable as a scorer, and at least equal as a ballhandler and distributor.
Roy's injury history isn't stellar, either. Given the roster situation last year after Oden's injury, you'd think Roy would have put up a few 50 point games. He probably will when he's fully matured as a player.
He's awesome already, though. I just picked him up in the 2nd round in a fantasy draft, to go with LeBron.
As much as I like Roy, Joe Johnson is bigger, quicker, and unstoppable as a scorer, and at least equal as a ballhandler and distributor.