Politics Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing, now with New allegations!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Will Kavanaugh be confirmed?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Burn it all down

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do Trump supporters fight to NOT find the truth so hard?

She asks for an FBI investigation....nothing. Volunteers for a lie detector test and passes it.

Both could have buried her if she was found to be lying. She still asks for it!

Oh, that's right she wants to destroy her life and her family's life to delay Kav.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Something that keeps nagging at me is how she often refers to the cost VS benefit of testifying

I have to think between her two go fund me accounts, the paid media appearances and the book deal/TV mini series, she should net a bunch
Click to expand...

...here's some straws so you won't have to keep grasping for them.


images
 
I think it was an excellent idea for the Republicans to bring in a sexual assault prosecutor to ask these questions.
 
rotary111 said:
Why do Trump supporters fight to NOT find the truth so hard?

She asks for an FBI investigation....nothing. Volunteers for a lie detector test and passes it.

Both could have buried her if she was found to be lying. She still asks for it!

Oh, that's right she wants to destroy her life and her family's life to delay Kav.
Click to expand...

We live in a land of subterfuge...
 
SlyPokerDog said:
1. She has no access to those GoFundMe accounts.

2. The loss of privacy, the threats to her herself and her family, and becoming this generation's Anita Hill are a cost that money won't solve.
Click to expand...

So, do you think she nets under one million or over?
 
To those who criticize her. Who refuse to believe her or even to contemplate believing her. To those who attempt to smear her. Who question why she didn't come forward earlier. Shame on you.

My wife experienced a similar trauma. Only, she wasn't able to get away. I take this very seriously. Anyone who would trivialize it disgusts me. Ford has come forward despite a political and media circus that has upended her life. I applaud her.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
For the same reason that Doctor Ford states she had no idea how to hire an attorney
Click to expand...

...what's so unbelievable about that?...there are many different types of attorneys with different qualifications and recommendations.

...you're really hanging on by your fingernails here.
 
Chris Wallace on Christine Blasey Ford Testimony: 'This Is a Disaster for Republicans'

Chris Wallace said Christine Blasey Ford's statement and testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee has been a "disaster" for Republicans.

Ford has accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's pick for the Supreme Court, of forcing himself on her when they were both Maryland high school students in the early 1980s. Kavanaugh has emphatically denied the allegation, but Ford's sexual misconduct claim and several others have placed his confirmation in doubt.

Ford delivered prepared remarks detailing the alleged sexual assault, and then answered questions from Democrats on the committee and sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, who was chosen to lead questioning for Republicans during the hearing.

After the hearing took a short break, Wallace said Ford was extremely emotional, raw and credible in her testimony and the first round of questioning.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/...estimony-rachel-mitchell-disaster-republicans
 
I have listened and watched a little bit today. Some of the line of questioning by the prosecutor is dumb af. Like seriously, the fact she didn't want to fly to DC but has flown other places is a basis to not believe her?
 
yankeesince59 said:
...what's so unbelievable about that?...there are many different types of attorneys with different qualifications and recommendations.

...you're really hanging on by your fingernails here.
Click to expand...


And here we are, right back to my opening statement, funny how people see things so differently
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Chris Wallace on Christine Blasey Ford Testimony: 'This Is a Disaster for Republicans'

Chris Wallace said Christine Blasey Ford's statement and testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee has been a "disaster" for Republicans.

Ford has accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's pick for the Supreme Court, of forcing himself on her when they were both Maryland high school students in the early 1980s. Kavanaugh has emphatically denied the allegation, but Ford's sexual misconduct claim and several others have placed his confirmation in doubt.

Ford delivered prepared remarks detailing the alleged sexual assault, and then answered questions from Democrats on the committee and sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, who was chosen to lead questioning for Republicans during the hearing.

After the hearing took a short break, Wallace said Ford was extremely emotional, raw and credible in her testimony and the first round of questioning.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/...estimony-rachel-mitchell-disaster-republicans
Click to expand...

...beat me to it again...I posted the same thing...saw yours, and deleted mine.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
And here we are, right back to my opening statement, funny how people see things so differently
Click to expand...


...lol...the difference though, is that I and others have pointed to actual facts/quotes etc., to reinforce why we feel the way we feel...you, on the other hand, have offered your obviously biased opinion...if you cannot grasp the difference I cannot help that.
...like I said, you're grasping at straws and woefully trying to serve a nothing sandwich.
 
I get that republicans are upset that this wasn't brought up earlier and was a last minute suprise by the dems. That doesn't change the fact that it happened and it is not a valid reason to excuse it. The republicans in the senate/on the committee and certain posters on here refuse to believe and take this seriously out of convienence.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Hey, I know you are sharp. Just my opinion. I do not find her credible
Click to expand...

of course you don't, but you had that opinion before this hearing. There is absolutely NO reason that a further investigation (by the FBI) shouldn't happen.
 
She is believable, but not reliable. She struggles to get simple, basic current (i.e. non-trauma) details out correctly.

A lot of nothing here. Her memory is not reliable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top