Based on what? Points per game?
Bol Bol was the much more agressive scorer and shot the hell out of the ball in a small sample (9 games) whereas Chet has picked his spots more and isn't really a focal point of Gonzaga's offense.
But the difference in the defensive film is drastic. Chet's feel and physicality is just on a whole different level.
How about based on:
Points (Bol Bol)
Rebounds (Bol Bol)
Essentially the same bpg (slight advantage Chet), same steals (slight advantage Bol Bol)
Shot better from 3 and ft
Essentially same on turnovers (slight advantage Bol Bol)
Worse on assists (2 for Chet, 1 for Bol Bol).
Oh and Bol Bol fouls less.
I mean, pretty much by every measure of the word he was, as I admitted before, a superior player in his limited experience.
That’s not to say Chet would end up like Bol Bol, I asked a question “what’s the difference between Bol Bol & Chet? Everything people are saying that makes Chet a unicorn was said about Bol Bol, plus Bol Bol was better in college.”
If the answer is “BBIQ”, ok, fair - curious why it hasn’t translated into some dominant college basketball player. Because he isn’t a focal points and picks his spots? Well, I’d argue if he was good enough, they’d make him a focal point.
That also doesn’t explain his disappearing acts in half of the games they’ve played against quality competition.
But like I said, it was a question.