RR7
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 18,793
- Likes
- 13,312
- Points
- 113
The Bulls owner was never interested in winning, just profit. The Bulls have been making $50M+ in PROFIT since the dynasty was blown up. That's yearly.
Chandler was on a rookie scale contract for years when they would have been paying Brand the MAX otherwise.
If you want to make the case that PA is cheap and only cares about profit, then go for it.
You might doubt me if there wasn't this consistent pattern with the Bulls. They traded Jamal Crawford, then Eddy Curry, then Chandler, then Ben Gordon when their rookie contracts ran out as well. All but Chandler were the team's leading scorer, too, and on teams that won 47 and 49 games. All for expiring contracts. They paid Tim Thomas MAX for a season and told him not to show up for practice or the games... LOL
Though I agree with you that Reinsdorf is cheap, and just looking to profit, the strategy, while extremely tough to deal with for many years for Bulls fans, wasn't all that horrible, in hindisght. I know it wasn't the actual plan, but not paying Crawford, Curry, Chandler, Gordon, etc. big money was the right decision, knowing that a team with Crawford, or Gordon as your best player isn't really going to win anything.
There best bet might have been keeping around, i think they had them al lat once, a nucleus of Artest, brand, and Crawford. Still, I think if you find your best guy is not what should be a team's best guy, throwing your hand back into the pot is a sound strategy. And it's similar to what the Blazers did with Zach. Felt him as their #1 was not going to be something they could build around, and threw it back in.
