<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Feb 11 2008, 01:33 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 11 2008, 01:27 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Feb 11 2008, 01:14 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Shapecity @ Feb 11 2008, 12:37 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Owners and GMs aren't going to put up with that type of non-sense from a sports agent. Neither will the players union.</div>
I'm really confused as to why you believe this does already go on today. This is standard practice and it is this type of power that wins clients for agents.
</div>
whether it is standard practice or not, by going public with the demand he has opened up a potential can of worms. If he is an attorney, he could potentially be censured or even disbarred. His SOLE interest is to do what is in the interest of his client--not what is in his OWN interest or in the interest of a DIFFERENT client. I am quite confident that he has violated the attorney's code of ethics--assuming he is one, of course. I guess the question is whether he has violated an ethical rule by just making this threat, or if the violation would only come when carrying it out.
</div>
He didn't go public with this as it was Nets sources that leaked this to the media.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Nets sources said the message came with the warning that Schwartz will steer other clients away from New Jersey in the future if they try to send Kidd to a lottery team.</div>
You are a lawyer, so I'll trust your judgment on this, but I don't see how leaked information from a biased party could lead to censure.
Thorn is trying to play chicken with Kidd through the media. Kidd wants to be traded so bad that he is trying to force Ratner to say, get rid of him while Thorn is trying to embarrass Kidd and gain the sympathy of the fans when he fails again and doesn't trade Kidd.
</div>
Like every other lgal issue, I'm sure there is a lot of "it depends" loaded in the answer. However, regardless of whether MAKING the threat was unethical, if actually following through with this threat would be unethical, it would seem to be a potential source of embarassment even to just point that out. I know very little about attorney ethics, partially because there are different, very specific rules that apply to me and people like me.