Knicks nix Rudy trade

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Well supposedly the two second round picks are still on the table, hence the "take it or leave it" quote in the story.

Ah, then "leave it". That said, if Portland (I said "if") is expecting a high first-round pick for Rudy, then anything I've ever read about Pritchard overvaluing his players goes double for the new front office.
 
Ah, then "leave it". That said, if Portland (I said "if") is expecting a high first-round pick for Rudy, then anything I've ever read about Pritchard overvaluing his players goes double for the new front office.

Like I said, it's Alan Hahn.
 
Well, birthday boy, here is my thinking.

With the signing of Matthews the team seems to be making it clear we're making a shift to defense as our top priority. This will easily cut back Rudy's playing time as well as his role one the team to merely a 'stand in the corner' shooter. He'll be unhappy and I think justifiably continue to demand a trade. That's not good for the team. I also think that when a team has too many players that can rightfully demand playing time that also creates problems. So get rid of the whole mess anyway you can.

As an example, did we get true "equal value" for Rasheed? No. For Zach? No. But we became a better "team" when we traded players that created problems. It's the same in this case. I hope the best for Rudy, but he has player out his welcome and is better moving on. If Cho can't, or won't, accommodate him, then cut his loose and let's all move forward. Sometimes a team has to take a small step back in order to take a larger step forward.
prior to Portland trading Sheed they'd suffered a ton of injuries to key players and muddled around sub-500... a McInnis & Stoudamire backcourt tandem somehow wasn't getting it done to the point that Derrick Anderson (a limited but legit 2 guard) coming back was a godsend. Darius Miles also came back just prior to Sheed's departure which allowed them to move part time starters QWoods or DDavis to the background. With a semblance of an NBA lineup during Wallace's last 10 games as a Blazer they went 8-2 and were 23-26 overall. The club featured Wallace Zach Miles Anderson and Stoudamire as their starters and was kicking butt. Post trade the team was relatively healthy from there on out and finished 41-41.

To say they were better as a team because of the Wallace trade is just wrong as it ignores the big picture of who else was missing. It's amazing to me that some still won't acknowledge how horrible that trade was for both team chemistry and overall talent. Managment passed up much better opportunities... it's like some choose to ignore facts to create the reality they want to see or maybe to not admit how wrong they were back in the day.

I'd contend in this case with Rudy that there is little urgency for the Blazers to make a move. He's on a very cheap contract, the roster is stacked without him, and his agent has promised he won't be showing up to play for Portland so he won't be around to pout about his role. If anyone thinks that any NBA team doesn't constantly deal with players being upset with their roles and minutes they are naive.

Best to wait for a real opportunity to improve the club then do anything rash. I'd imagine they have several end of the 1st round type offers they could cash in at any time... so why not shoot for something better? It would disappoint me if Cho settled for something so meh in exchange for a young legit rotation player

STOMP
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top