Nate is very good at getting an undermanned team to battle. If I was a soldier and was attacking Normandy, Nate is the guy I'd want leading me. If I were a soldier that had a 2-1 advantage over my enemy, I would not want Nate to lead me.
What he did great last night is run. The L*kers defense was on their heels a lot because of the push the Blazers did on offense. But let's no kid ourselves. The reason we won is because Roy went 9-11 and because Bayless thought the hoop was 10 feet in diameter in the first half.
I agree with this, Nate gets his players, experienced or not, to buy into their assigned roles and gets them to give 100% within those roles. He hardly ever assigns a role that his player can't flourish with. I think there's a trust and loyalty between his guys and him. This trust and loyalty convinces his players to not stray away from the system. I don't care if the system is flawed, if everyone buys into it, it's going to be successful more times than not.
But, what you're not giving him credit for is a number of other coaching moves he's made that adds to our successes.
- Moving Outlaw to reserve power forward
- Sticking with the rookie Batum as our starting small forward
- Including Bayless and Webster in big-game situations and building their confidence
- Moving Aldridge to the five, opening up time for the very versatile and skilled Cunningham
- Being more flexible with his offense and adapting to Andre Miller
That high pick-and-roll between our centers and our guards has always been very effective and it worked extremely well last night. The ISOs have always worked well. Nate goes with what works. The results were very positive last year, and they're very positive this year.
He motivates. His players execute. His plays get high percentage shots. His team wins more often than not. The dude is better than his detractors make out.