KP's Post-Deadline Q&A Transcript

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
From: Behind The Beat

(Hopefully, it's no problem posting the entire exchange as it's just q&a stuff)

KP: No trades. We made one yesterday that got us a trade exception, something we feel like is a good thing for us.

The bottom line is that we looked at everything. This was a busy trading deadline. Tom (Penn), Mike (Born), Chad (Buchanan), Nate (McMillan), myself. We looked at every scenario. I can't tell you how many scenarios we went through. But at the end of the day it came down to this: We believe in this team. And I don't want to give up or give away any of our young players, and that's why we were the centerpiece of some of these trades. Because we have young, good players and we think that we can get into the playoffs and we are going to go to war with this team and we feel good with where we are.

So that was the biggest decision factor in not doing anything. When you look down at our team, from top to bottom, we've worked so hard to get them and feel good about them, that we didn't want to do anything. That doesn't prevent us from doing something in the summer and gives us flexibility for the summer. It just puts it off a little bit.

Q: Are you disappointed you couldn't pull something off?
KP: I consider us deal makers. We like doing that. What's different now is we've made so many deals that have brought good players and good people that now you're talking about giving up those guys. And I don't want to give up anybody. I believe in these guys.

When you look at your team with Rudy (Fernandez) and (Nicolas) Batum and Brandon (Roy), as special as he is, and LaMarcus (Aldridge) and Greg (Oden) and Joel (Przybilla), I just don't want to give up on those guys. I think that we can go a long way with what we have and maybe we get criticized because we didn't pull the trigger on Raef's deal, but what Raef's deal does is allow us to let it expire and give us some flexibility this summer.

Q: Surprised you didn't make a deal? Did you go in thinking you would?
KP: Boy I tell you what. It goes through ups and down. One minute you think that there is going to be a deal and you really like it and then the next thing you know it's not there. So it was both. I would say it's both. We thought there were some deals and we walked away.

Q: Did you come close?
KP: I don't know what close means. Did it get to where there were 30 conversations about one deal? Absolutely. But we like our team. Paul Allen last night at dinner I think summed it up best, and that is, let's go to war with this team and see what they're about. We can make adjustments in the future. What we could do is make a huge mistake and give up on someone too early.

Q: You really pushed things to the last minute:
KP: Last 30 seconds. It was down to that on a couple things.

Q: Was something on the table and it was your decision to back out?
KP: It takes two to tango on any trade, so it was both of us. But, yeah, some of them came down to us saying no.

Q: How would you describe the position you're in heading into the summer?
KP: It gives us another 30 games to see what we got, to see if this team can make it into the playoffs, to see if they can still overachieve as we've done. We're effectively the youngest team in the league and we have 33 wins at this time. So it's hard for me to say it's logical to make a big change. And you guys know, we talk about this all the time, how important our chemistry and our culture is. I wasn't going to take a chance on losing that. And there were a couple deals that we really questioned whether we would lose our culture, what our identity is about.

Q: So much has been made about economics during the deadline. Did that ever play a role in the decision to keep Raef's contract?
KP: It's a big ... factor for the rest of the league. The lucky thing we have is Mr. (Paul) Allen and he is a go-for-it guy. He is willing to go for it. Right now is not the right time to go for it. If the economics get worse, that might be better for us.

Q: Surprised at the general inactivity across the league?
KP: What's interesting is that (there were) not a lot of deals that I can tell. Maybe more come out that I'm not aware of. But what I can tell you is there was a ton of talking. This year was as active as can be and it was active for guys to get off contracts. Everybody wanted off contracts. And other than that I don't want to get into specifics of deals.

Q: Are you surprised there wasn't more demand for Raef's contract?
KP: I think there was a fair of demand on Raef's contract.

Q: Just nothing feasible for you?
KP: Nothing that we didn't have to give up on something that we believe in. And again, I want to reiterate this (because) this is the biggest point: We have a great culture with great kids and why tinker with it right now? I believe the big moves should be made in the offseason because when you make moves during the season, you add an element of risk that you can't quantify. So that was a big reason.

Q: You look exhausted, did you leave it all on the court?
KP: We all go after it as hard as we possibly can. Tom Penn, Chad Buchanan, Mike Bourn. I mean Nate (McMillan) and I were on the phone constantly. I bet you I had a thousand e-mails back and forth to Paul Allen in the last week. And I think that's our strength is that we really communicate well. We don't agree on everything. We disagree on some things. But in the end, we felt this was the best thing.

Q: You failed to acquire more experience. Is that a shortfall in not making deal?
KP: Could be. And I'll take that responsibility of not adding that, if you want to call it, That Veteran. We felt like the big thing for us is we have this group of guys that are growing together and if I thought that it was absolutely necessary to have that pure vet, then we probably would have gone and tried to get it. I think this team can grow up without that. I'll take that responsibility of not bringing on a vet.

Q: Was there a plausible deal that you decided not to do:
KP: Yes.

Q: More than one?
KP: Yes.
 
WOW.

Props to KP. Ice water in his veins for walking away from numerous deals with his hand on the trigger with the clock ticking down from :30 on the trade clock.

jeez!
 
:clap:

It gives us another 30 games to see what we got, to see if this team can make it into the playoffs, to see if they can still overachieve as we've done. We're effectively the youngest team in the league and we have 33 wins at this time. So it's hard for me to say it's logical to make a big change. And you guys know, we talk about this all the time, how important our chemistry and our culture is. I wasn't going to take a chance on losing that. And there were a couple deals that we really questioned whether we would lose our culture, what our identity is about.
 
WOW.

Props to KP. Ice water in his veins for walking away from numerous deals with his hand on the trigger with the clock ticking down from :30 on the trade clock.

jeez!

Some call it ice water . . . but it could be phrased in a different way
 
Some call it ice water . . . but it could be phrased in a different way

I personally wanted a deal; what i'm trying to say is not too many people, especially those who are involved in Portland Blazer basketball, in his situation would've walked away from the table empty-handed.
 
I personally wanted a deal; what i'm trying to say is not too many people, especially those who are involved in Portland Blazer basketball, in his situation would've walked away from the table empty-handed.

I missed that point, but now I get it. Basically, it might have taken more guts not to pull off a trade since everyone was expecting/hoping for one.

I don't know if I buy that . . . but I see where you are coming from.
 
geez... he said so many lines verbatim (or pretty darned close) to things I've been saying/siting all week speculating why they might not make a move. A few favs...

-what Raef's deal does is allow us to let it expire and give us some flexibility this summer.
-It takes two to tango on any trade
-If the economics get worse, that might be better for us.
-I believe the big moves should be made in the offseason because when you make moves during the season, you add an element of risk that you can't quantify.
STOMP
 
Q: So much has been made about economics during the deadline. Did that ever play a role in the decision to keep Raef's contract?
KP: It's a big ... factor for the rest of the league. The lucky thing we have is Mr. (Paul) Allen and he is a go-for-it guy. He is willing to go for it. Right now is not the right time to go for it. If the economics get worse, that might be better for us.


This is what I like. Yes they didn't pull the trigger on anything today, but they sure have in the past and they sure will in the future. We have an incredibly lucky combo of a billionaire owner who wants to go for it all and a front office that is incredibly creative and intelligent. I have no doubt that when the time is right, when our core is arriving in their prime, that they'll make the moves to get the team to the next level.

Can't complain about that... what am I thinking, of course we can.
 
Some call it ice water . . . but it could be phrased in a different way

Yes:


Paul Allen





I think Paul makes many basketball decisions for this team. You even read KP state, "we (Mr. Allen and I) don't always agree on everthing...." And there you go.

I'll bet Paul likes Travis for example. Just last night, Travis was on the receiving end of an alley oop, performed quite the act at handling the ball in mid air and layed it off the glass. The cameras went (for a split second) to Paul's face. I tell you, I saw exhuberance in those eyes! Paul loves Travis, I tell ya. And I'll just be some interesting deals may have went down if it had not been for Paul telling KP - "I just don't want to give up Travis."


I also believe (guess) that Paul loves Roy, LA and Rudy.

I'm just really hoping that he doesn't have a man-crush on Sergio! LOL
 
Q: Just nothing feasible for you?
KP: Nothing that we didn't have to give up on something that we believe in.

US (Believers vs. Them) Haters

Bake It
 
I personally wanted a deal; what i'm trying to say is not too many people, especially those who are involved in Portland Blazer basketball, in his situation would've walked away from the table empty-handed.

On the other hand, coming away with an expiring contract giving us a lot of wiggle room for an off season trade may be the most shrewed of moves.
 
LOL I actually hated that quote.

This team is overachieving, meaning we aren't that good.

No, meaning we're still young.

I still abide by my pre-season theory that if this team wins 50 games, it will have been a successful season. There's nothing at this point telling me otherwise.
 
On the other hand, coming away with an expiring contract giving us a lot of wiggle room for an off season trade may be the most shrewed of moves.

I don't get it, how does letting Raef's contract expire give us more wiggle room in off season trades?

I get that we get cap space to go after FA's . . . but can we still trade Raef's contract this summer?
 
1. If he thinks the team is "overachieving", why not change things? You sell HIGH, not low. If the team (meaning individuals) are outperforming where the management expected them to be, why not cash in a few of those chips? Is it better to wait, as Chicago and so many other teams before them have done, for assets to stop overachieving before you trade them?

2. Culture doesn't win basketball games. Players do. If the team thought it could get better players, I believe it should have done so. If the current group of players is more valuable than what they might have received (and I think that this IS possible), then "culture" isn't relevant. I'm not advocating bringing in criminals or bad people, but putting this group of players in a bubble where the core is untouched isn't really very realistic unless things go perfectly.

I dunno. I can see what he's saying and I don't have all the facts. I just wish we knew more.

Ed O.
 
I don't get it, how does letting Raef's contract expire give us more wiggle room in off season trades?

I get that we get cap space to go after FA's . . . but can we still trade Raef's contract this summer?

We can basically make an "uneven" trade in terms of salary cap ratio because of how much we are under the cap.

So if we are in the ballpark of 7m of capspace then we could conceivably trade travis (4m/yr) for someone making 11m/yr.

Also, don't forget the TE we have too. We can also use that in a "separate transaction"
 
We can basically make an "uneven" trade in terms of salary cap ratio because of how much we are under the cap.

So if we are in the ballpark of 7m of capspace then we could conceivably trade travis (4m/yr) for someone making 11m/yr.

Also, don't forget the TE we have too. We can also use that in a "separate transaction"

Thank you.

I knew about the TE, but not the rule about being under the cap allows a trade where you don't have to match salaries.
 
I dunno. I can see what he's saying and I don't have all the facts. I just wish we knew more.

Ed O.

Agree. I think that is why everyone is going in circles here . . . all we know is teams were actively seeking Raef and the Blazers didn't make a move.

We won't ever know, but if we knew what was turned down, tehre might be more of a consensus (one way or another) on the non-move(s).
 
Thank you.

I knew about the TE, but not the rule about being under the cap allows a trade where you don't have to match salaries.

Is this the problem with other posters today? I assumed that people knew this? This summer will be a buyer's market like no other, and the Blazers can take on a nice, juicy contract if they choose to without busting up the rotation. Plus an additional $4 million from insurance in the budget because of RLEC.

Which is why I've been saying that making anything other than a lopsided deal today made no sense.
 
We can basically make an "uneven" trade in terms of salary cap ratio because of how much we are under the cap.

So if we are in the ballpark of 7m of capspace then we could conceivably trade travis (4m/yr) for someone making 11m/yr.

Also, don't forget the TE we have too. We can also use that in a "separate transaction"
basically, the blazers can have all the same potential trade targets in the summer because they don't need to match salaries. and while that means the blazers (likely) won't be able to take a bad contract off of someone's hands in the deal, they will be able to give that team immediate savings if the blazers decide to go that route.
 
I dunno. I can see what he's saying and I don't have all the facts. I just wish we knew more.

Ed O.
the only way to really determine whether not making a trade was a mistake or not is if we knew all of the available trade options. and we'll never know that so we'll just have to guess. i assume that since a deal wasn't made, there wasn't a good enough deal out there that didn't require giving up one of the rookies.
 
Is this the problem with other posters today? I assumed that people knew this? This summer will be a buyer's market like no other, and the Blazers can take on a nice, juicy contract if they choose to without busting up the rotation. Plus an additional $4 million from insurance in the budget because of RLEC.

Which is why I've been saying that making anything other than a lopsided deal today made no sense.

Well I still think KP has yet to show the capability to make a in season trade for a vet, so I'm not giving him the god status that no trades to make the Blazers better were available.

But it is good to know Blazers have options this summer.
 
WOW.

Props to KP. Ice water in his veins for walking away from numerous deals with his hand on the trigger with the clock ticking down from :30 on the trade clock.
Is it just me, or is Kevin Pritchard full of shit? If he was so committed to sticking with this young team, why was he on the phone constantly with other GMs, and emailing Paul Allen a thousand times a day? The fact is, he was very willing to trade some of our young players for the right deal--he just couldn't quite make it happen. All this stuff about sticking with the young guys is BS, in my humble opinion.
 
Last edited:
Well I still think KP has yet to show the capability to make a in season trade for a vet, so I'm not giving him the god status that no trades to make the Blazers better were available.

But it is good to know Blazers have options this summer.

I'm not giving him god status either. That said, the team is likely to be in a very similar situation this summer in terms of leverage, but with even more panicked sellers.
 
Is it just me, or is Kevin Pritchard full of shit? If he was so committed to sticking with this young team, why was he on the phone constantly with other GMs, and emailing Paul Allen a thousand times a day? The fact is, he was very willing to trade some of our young players for the right deal--he just couldn't quite make it happen. All this stuff about sticking with the young guys is BS, in my humble opinion.
that doesn't make him full of shit.

he wouldn't be doing his job if he wasn't on the phone looking for ways to make the team better. that doesn't mean he isn't committed to the team as it stands, just that if he thinks he can improve it he will.

and every player in the history of the nba was available to be traded no matter how much their teams say they were committed to that player or how they were untouchable.
 
he wouldn't be doing his job if he wasn't on the phone looking for ways to make the team better. that doesn't mean he isn't committed to the team as it stands, just that if he thinks he can improve it he will.
:clap:

Great example of double-speak. You must be studying at the Kevin Pritchard school of public relations.
 
I don't get it, how does letting Raef's contract expire give us more wiggle room in off season trades?

I get that we get cap space to go after FA's . . . but can we still trade Raef's contract this summer?

It does seem like we might have gained something for future negotiations. That is, other GMs learned that KP is willing to walk away rather than compromise - and that experience may encourage them to meet KPs demands in the future (if/when he has something they want).

Of course, whether we gained that leverage depends on just how the deals failed to go down, and we'll never know that.

barfo
 
1. If he thinks the team is "overachieving", why not change things? You sell HIGH, not low. If the team (meaning individuals) are outperforming where the management expected them to be, why not cash in a few of those chips? Is it better to wait, as Chicago and so many other teams before them have done, for assets to stop overachieving before you trade them?

2. Culture doesn't win basketball games. Players do. If the team thought it could get better players, I believe it should have done so. If the current group of players is more valuable than what they might have received (and I think that this IS possible), then "culture" isn't relevant. I'm not advocating bringing in criminals or bad people, but putting this group of players in a bubble where the core is untouched isn't really very realistic unless things go perfectly.

I dunno. I can see what he's saying and I don't have all the facts. I just wish we knew more.

Ed O.

Agreed on both points.

Just as an aside, there is one fact we do know - NO was ready to move Chandler in a salary dump. If you have an asset that is about to lose value (IE the contracts of Frye and Raef) why not flip them for an asset that has at least *some* value going forward?

It wouldn't have been a "home-run", or a "slam dunk", or a "Pritchslap".....but it would have given us a valuable trade chip to use this summer.
 
:clap:

Great example of double-speak. You must be studying at the Kevin Pritchard school of public relations.

Do you like your car?

Would you sell it to me at half its value?

Would you sell it to me at twice its value?
 
Do you like your car?

Would you sell it to me at half its value?

Would you sell it to me at twice its value?

ABM, good to hear you are employed! Which dealership?

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top