Draco
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,315
- Likes
- 3,004
- Points
- 113
Well BrianFromWA was always one of my more favorite posters so it did bother me in the summer to see him have such a strong opinion that was so terribly wrong.Lots of chest thumping and hand wringing in this thread.
1) He isn't signed.
2) The season is still young.
I'm glad that he says he would sign and extension, but I find it humorous that this was said, when he's acting as though this is a done deal.
He hasn't signed. This is all talk at this point. A lot can happen in the next six months. We could go on another 13 game losing streak. We could go on to win the championship, but you don't know what will happen anymore than we do. Nobody expected the team to be this good at this juncture. I figured we were good enough to be a top 4 or 5 seed. I still think we might end up around 4th in the west, but most of the talk about trading Aldridge was BEFORE we brought in Mo, Wright, Lopez, and Robinson. I underestimated Olshey. I didn't think he could completely retool our bench like that.
The point is; there is still a long way to go, he can't sign an extension until after the season, and a lot can happen in six months. I wouldn't count your chickens before they're hatched.
Trading away an all-star player for less than equal value is a bad move. A top pick in a terrible draft was not good value. If the Blazers could’ve got fair value for Aldridge I was fine with trading him. That the Blazers are winning or losing right now or that Aldridge has or hasn’t signed an extension is irrelevant to the decision to trade him 5 months ago.
Its ironic that posters thought the team should trade away their best player for less than equal value over something that might happen in two years time. Now the same posters think we should have patience in judging decisions from 5 months ago. Where was the patience back then?

I love the way you think!
After that coup, no wonder you think the Blazers are going to go unbeaten.