Lakers waiving Kendall Marshall

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

Natebishop3

Don't tread on me!
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
94,170
Likes
57,383
Points
113
[TWEET]490191364488167424[/TWEET]

I would pick him up. I think he'd be a great third point guard. Someone young that could play behind Dame and Blake.
 
Would love to add him over Crabbe personally. And while he'll never be a good defender, he's someone you can play alongside dame ok because he has the size to cover 2s
 
Would love to add him over Crabbe personally. And while he'll never be a good defender, he's someone you can play alongside dame ok because he has the size to cover 2s

Exactly. I would be really happy with him as a future backup who can play with Lillard.
 
What money do we have to sign him? We used our BAE on BlAkE.
 
What money do we have to sign him? We used our BAE on BlAkE.

We wouldn't necessarily need money to sign him.

A team can claim a player on waivers only if one of the following is true:

The team is far enough under the salary cap to fit the player's entire salary.

The team has a Disabled Player exception for at least the player's salary (see question number 25), and the player is on the last season of his contract.

The team has a trade exception for at least the player's salary (see question number 85).

The player has a minimum salary contract.

If a team makes a successful waiver claim, it acquires the player and his existing contract, and pays the remainder of his salary -- the waiving team is relieved of all responsibility for the player. There is a fee of $1,000, payable to the league office, for claiming a player on waivers. If more than one team tries to claim a player on waivers, the team with the worst record gets him.

So essentially we can make a claim for his current contract, which is the vet minimum I believe. If another team makes a similar claim, it would then come down to records.
 
Don't we need cap space to make an offer on a waived player?
 
Would he want to sign as a 3rd string PG when he could be 2nd somewhere else?
 
Marshall averaged 11 assists per 36 minutes last year and shot 40% from 3. Decent numbers!
 
Not if that player is on a minimum salary contract, which I think Marshall is.

Why would the Lakers want to cut him and then possibly bring him back on a lower salary contract if he is already making the minimum?
 
Marshall has the sort of floor-vision that Dame just doesn't have. Having these guys as our PGs would give us two entirely different ways to run the offense. Marshall with Barton, Robinson, and even Leonard would be a high-energy, potentially potent (!) offensive unit.

And Marshall could play with either Dame or Blake.
 
Why would the Lakers want to cut him and then possibly bring him back on a lower salary contract if he is already making the minimum?

I have no worldly idea. Aren't they already under the cap? It can't be about clear cap space...
 
If Marshall already has a minimum salary, why would the Lakers waive him and have interest in resigning him to a new contract? He'd still be on his rookie contract which is not considered minimum is it?
 
If Marshall already has a minimum salary, why would the Lakers waive him and have interest in resigning him to a new contract? He'd still be on his rookie contract which is not considered minimum is it?

He isn't on a rookie contract. The Lakers signed him outright last season.
 
He is on the minimum salary. They need to waive him to compete other deals. But could then go over cap to sign him to another minimum deal
 
If Marshall already has a minimum salary, why would the Lakers waive him and have interest in resigning him to a new contract? He'd still be on his rookie contract which is not considered minimum is it?

Pretty sure he was waived last season, cleared waivers, got a MIN deal from...WAS (?)...then somehow (waived or traded) made his way to the Lakers.
 
He is on the minimum salary. They need to waive him to compete other deals. But could then go over cap to sign him to another minimum deal

If they waive him I thought they lost all rights to go over the cap to re-sign him?
 
If they waive him I thought they lost all rights to go over the cap to re-sign him?
Anyone can sign minimum salary players to fill a roster regardless of cap space. They don't possess rights to him, just an nba rule so teams can fill rosters
 
So they must be wanting to go over the cap to sign someone else. Not that they really are going to sign him later to push them over the cap. They will already be at it or over.

Either way, stupid idea on the part of the Lakers but I love them being stupid.
 
Why haven't we picked him up yet!!! :MARIS61:
 
It would be a good pickup. We need a 3rd PG. I think Kendall may even beat out Blake.
 
Back
Top