Larry Miller Interview re: Penn, Pritchard, Rumors, Etc.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
http://www.columbian.com/weblogs/bl...iew-blazers-president-miller-on-pritchard-pe/

Transcript of an interview conducted Thursday evening with Portland Trail Blazers president Larry Miller.

Miller on whether he has any knowledge of tension between the basketball and business sides of the Blazers:

No. I mean, to me, I think we are probably more so than any team in the NBA that I am aware of, we have a closer relationship between basketball and the rest of the business more than any team, I think, in the NBA. As far as my knowledge or the awareness of any animosity or anything like that, the answer is no. I mean, we've done our retreats together. We work together, as good, if not better, than any team in the NBA. And the idea that there's some animosity from folks towards Kevin (Pritchard) and Tom (Penn) any reason is definitely not true. To me, everybody in the organization wants the basketball side to do well. Because the better the basketball department does, the better we all do. So, definitely from my perspective, as far as my concern, as far as my knowledge, there's no animosity at all between the basketball departments and the rest of the departments. So, wherever you're hearing that from, I don't know where they're getting that from.

On whether Penn, former vice president of basketball operations, was given a specific reason when he was fired:

I can't go into any of the details. And, again, to me, the comment of "philosophical differences," that's really what it came down to. And it was an organizational decision. It was a senior-management decision. And, like I said, I can't get in to any details. But we wish Tom the best and I have to stick with the comment.

On whether the decision to fire Penn came from a high-ranking official outside of the Blazers organization, and Miller had little involvement beyond executing the order:

The only thing I can comment to you on is, it was a management decision — it wasn't a single person's decision. It was a management decision.

On clarifying "senior-management decision":

It was a senior-management group. It was a group senior management decision. It wasn't one person's decision. And there were people — it wasn't just folks from Seattle; there were folks from Portland as well.

On whether Pritchard's future with the organization is short term, Pritchard's job security, and his overall performance as GM:

Kevin is our GM. He continues to be our GM. From my perspective, Kevin's done a good job of building the team that has gotten us to where we are. To me, this was an incident that was specific to Tom Penn. We should, from my perspective, again, we should be focused on winning games and trying to go deep in the playoffs. And as unfortunate as this is, we should now move to put it behind us and move forward.

On whether there is any resentment toward Pritchard and Penn because of the team's recent success:

I think it's absolutely being dreamed up. Kevin and I have had a great working relationship since the time I've been here and continue to. And, to me, I want the basketball department to do well, and I think everybody here does. Because the better off they do, the better off the organization is. I'm always — in every job I've been in, in every organization I've worked for — I've always been a team player. And so, that hasn't changed with the Trail Blazers. And, again, from my perspective and anybody that I know of, I don't know of any animosity or ill feelings toward Kevin. It just doesn't make sense to me.
 
Yet again, the real Blazer news is being provided by the Columbian, while the Oregonian just stands by and watches. O, how the mighty have fallen.
 
I personally feel that Quick has become too emotionally attached to certain people within the organization to properly do his job; when he was on the MSP the other morning and the topic of Tom Penn and his possibly 'abrasive' personality was brought up, he went on about how ridiculous that was, until Jaynes said something like "Really? Some of the people I've talked to in the league and within the organization pretty much confirmed that." at which point Quick had to agree that he'd also heard it. I just get the feeling that he filters a lot of what he hears and knows, instead of just reporting.
 
The only tension is between me and BeerBitch!
 
I personally feel that Quick has become too emotionally attached to certain people within the organization to properly do his job; when he was on the MSP the other morning and the topic of Tom Penn and his possibly 'abrasive' personality was brought up, he went on about how ridiculous that was, until Jaynes said something like "Really? Some of the people I've talked to in the league and within the organization pretty much confirmed that." at which point Quick had to agree that he'd also heard it. I just get the feeling that he filters a lot of what he hears and knows, instead of just reporting.

As much as I'd agree. Quick has interacted with TP where DJ is speaking from 3rd hard experience, "well I heard from this guy that this guy is this." You don't really know unless you've met the guy.

Speaking about someones character without actually knowing them is low IMO. I heard he's a douche so he must be.
 
As much as I'd agree. Quick has interacted with TP where DJ is speaking from 3rd hard experience, "well I heard from this guy that this guy is this." You don't really know unless you've met the guy.

Speaking about someones character without actually knowing them is low IMO. I heard he's a douche so he must be.

Quick's own personal interactions Penn don't have much to do with Penn's interactions between other people in the organization though ... and it wasn't like Jaynes was saying TP was a douche, he was just saying that he'd heard rumblings from more than one person around the league and within the organization.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top