Larry Sanders may be available...

[Rastapopoulos]

...for a good reason.

 

[Natebishop3]

I would definitely take Hibbert before I would take Sanders.

 

[PapaG]

I've known that Sanders was a disaster since before he signed that contract. There is no need to use up that much cap space on a guy whose own teammates can't trust him.

 

[HailBlazers]

...for a good reason.

We could use his scrap

 

[Boob-No-More]

...for a good reason.

Lots of reasons, actually.

No way in hell would I want this guy over Rolo, and he's WAY too overpaid to be coming off the bench. Bad guy, bad contract. Don't want anything to do with him.

BNM

 

[Rhal]

I've known that Sanders was a disaster since before he signed that contract. There is no need to use up that much cap space on a guy whose own teammates can't trust him.

Prime example of why you don't overpay for one year of great play on a bad team in a contract year.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

[BlazerWookee]

Yeah, but if we take Larry Sanders, does that mean we have to take Hank Kingsley, too?

 

[OneLifeToLive]

Blazers would never look at him

 

[Boob-No-More]

Yeah, but if we take Larry Sanders, does that mean we have to take Hank Kingsley, too?

BNM

 

[riverman]

Psychotic guys like him never really screamed out success from my angle.

 

[Draco]

I'd want to get him in the last year of his contract. He'll bounce back to a defensive player of the year at that time. Then some dumb team will overpay him again.

 

[GriLtCheeZ]

He's not worth the trouble. He sounds way too unpredictable.

 

[Fez Hammersticks]

I think I'll scratch him off my off-season wish list.

He's clearly a lot crazier than I thought.

Ruben Patterson crazy.