All of them are nice, but the text placement on the Melo one sucks IMO. Also on the Steve Nash one, it should be "The definition of a MVP", not "The definition of an MVP". USE CORRECT GRAMMER GOSH. jk.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LUD @ Apr 27 2006, 07:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>All of them are nice, but the text placement on the Melo one sucks IMO. Also on the Steve Nash one, it should be "The definition of a MVP", not "The definition of an MVP". USE CORRECT GRAMMER GOSH. jk.</div>Are you sure about that? I wouldn't say so.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LUD @ Apr 27 2006, 08:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>All of them are nice, but the text placement on the Melo one sucks IMO. Also on the Steve Nash one, it should be "The definition of a MVP", not "The definition of an MVP". USE CORRECT GRAMMER GOSH. jk.</div>Does "a MVP" sound good to you? Look at the sound. The sound is "Em" so it would be an thankyou very much.
Actually A MVP does sound better, but correct grammer is only use the word "an" when the next word starts with a vowel, if the next word starts with a consinent you use "a".
It doesn't go for letters, it goes for sounds. If it sounds like a vowel then you say an. If it sounds like a consinent then you go with a. Would you also say, would you like a M&M or would you like an M&M.Anyway, Nemesis if you could revamp that text i would definately sport that sig.