So what is your stance? Are we better or not? Or did you post and I need to go back (totally honest question - your response just here isn’t clear).
We're WAY better.
The Blazers strategy is based on 2 imperatives:
1) Create an atmosphere of SUPPORT - emotional and otherwise.
2) Get SHOOTERs and teach them to play basketball.
The basic idea for #1 is Players who are mediocre elsewhere thrive here. That's how we get a competitive advantage.
The basic idea for #2 is to give the defense no quarter.
Imagine a team with 5 players who are all great shooters - let's call them Kyle Korvers.
Trap or double team them, they swing the ball to an open Kyle Korver.
Man2man defense? They do double off-ball screens or some other crazy action. A Kyle Korver will get open.
How to do this in practice?
No problem, we have..
ballhandling Kyle Korvers,
rebounding Kyle Korvers,
screening Kyle Korvers,
defender Kyle Korvers...
So, why all of the turnover? Because outside of Biebs and Curry, all of them were bad to horrible Kyle Korvers.
Who did we get?
A Kyle Korver who can guard PFs (z3)
A Kyle Korver who can defend (Bazemore)
A Kyle Korver who can simply shoot over half the league (Hood)
A Kyle Korver who is superathletic and can do a little of everything (Little, he'll be a very good shooter, but not right away)
A Kyle Korver ball handler (Super Mario)