Libertarian Party Candidate Michael Badnarik Suffers Heart Atttack

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Denny Crane

It's not even loaded!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
73,111
Likes
10,940
Points
113
http://www.infowars.com/libertarian-party-candidate-michael-badnarik-suffers-heart-atttack/

Libertarian Party Candidate Michael Badnarik Suffers Heart Atttack

Michael J. Badnarik, the Libertarian Party nominee for President of the United States in the 2004 elections and a former software engineer and radio talk show host has suffered a heart attack. Badnarik is also the president of the 2009 Continental Congress.

Badnarik was in Madison, Wisconsin, attending a hearing regarding a raw milk case when he collapsed, according to Gary Franchi, the National Director of Restore the Republic. “After the hearing he got in a car to go to lunch with friends, He then slumped over. His friends attempted CPR and contacted the paramedics. They attempted to revive him 3 times with no success. Upon the 4th attempt his heart was revived yet with erratic behavior,” writes Franchi in an email.

Michael was taken to a local hospital in Wisconsin and fitted with a temporary pacemaker and a balloon pump to ease stress on his heart. He remains in an unconscious state and his condition is listed as serious.

In November 2009, Badnarik was elected as one of three delegates from the State of Texas to attend the 2009 Continental Congress sponsored by the We The People Foundation, and subsequently elected parliamentary president of that body.

In October 2008, he began hosting a talk radio program, Lighting the Fires of Liberty, on the Genesis Communications Network.
 
I voted for him in 2004. I have no idea why anyone who claimed to oppose the war voted for Kerry (who wanted to upsize the military) or Bush.
 
I voted for him in 2004. I have no idea why anyone who claimed to oppose the war voted for Kerry (who wanted to upsize the military) or Bush.

Probably because they disagreed with important pieces of the Libertarian Party platform.

That was my reason anyway.

Presidents generally do more than simply wage war. They have a whole bunch of other equally important duties. You go with the best package deal you can get.

Although, come to think of it, a Libertarian President would probably do nothing at all.
 
I voted for him in 2004. I have no idea why anyone who claimed to oppose the war voted for Kerry (who wanted to upsize the military) or Bush.

Maybe all people who oppose the war aren't single-issue voters?

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top