lamlor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2018
- Messages
- 393
- Likes
- 422
- Points
- 63
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse in here today. The concept of opportunity cost clearly isn't gaining any traction. Having nothing on the roster with a bit of capspace is better than having three immovable deals for which we would need to give up assets to get rid of. We have nearly 120 mil tied up in contracts for players who will give us nothing for three years. It would be have been close to 200 mil if we didn't find the AC trade dump.
Even Houston got fucked to an extent with the Gordon and Anderson deals, but Gordon has surprisingly remained healthy and is putting up numbers. Anderson is trash. But the rest of their roster was flexible enough and comprised of the right contracts to get a guy like CP. Most teams have one or two bad deals like this. We have three. In this market where players don't consider POR a destination to force trades to, these mistakes are so much more magnified.
Total BS. They aren't more valuable. They may become more palatable, or less terrible - but in no way will those contracts ever have ANY value.So the rest of Dame's tenure is two seasons? Because all 3 of those contracts come off the books then. All 3 become expiring after next season which also makes them more valuable.
You skipped the year where Houston got 8 seed and "superstar" Harden didn't make an All NBA team.They went to the WCF in 2015 (after winning 56 games), won 55 games last year before flaming out against the SAS buzzsaw. And they have a bonafide MVP candidate. Besides the fact that they still had the pieces needed to make a deal for CP in the first place, which we clearly do not.
Not seeing what you are.
Total BS. They aren't more valuable. They may become more palatable, or less terrible - but in no way will those contracts ever have ANY value.
It’s so obvious Neil thinks this roster is a lot better than it is lol. He’s absolutely unwilling to admit any fault in getting us into this mess and I wouldn’t doubt that he’s calling for Stotts to be fired behind the scenes to bite the bullet for his fuck ups.
If he doesn’t make us clearly better by the summer then PA needs to bring in a new GM who’s intial sole task is to find a good deal for one or more of CJ, Collins, and Nurk. We’re not going to somehow sky rocket into contending by developing what we have, making bargain deals, and drafting in the mid to late first round. This is hell.
Or even as early as the trade deadline next year.I'm not saying I'd make these trades but our players instantly become this valuable once the summer of 2019 gets here.
We don't know what the climate is right now but if those contracts were expiring right now they'd have a TON of value. We could get just about any name available right now since most teams are asking for no long term money.
If expiring...
Harkless, Leonard, and a 1st for Jordan would be possible.
Turner for George Hill.
Leonard for Jordan Clarkson.
Turner, Leonard, and a 1st plus a young guy for Gasol.
I'm not saying I'd make these trades but our players instantly become this valuable once the summer of 2019 gets here.
Dame, CJ, Collins, and Nurk IS a decent core to build around. The problem is that they need a huge upgrade on the wing to make it work. That is a difficult task considering our salary position but not impossible.
Shoot I just posted that same thought, more or less. Oh, well.I think Olshey understands what a mess we are in and is doing whatever possible to try to make the situation better. Whether that is possible, who knows? Also, I wouldn't assume that he isn't willing to trade CJ; the sentiments being leaked could be just to try to inflate his trade value.

Dame, CJ, Collins, and Nurk IS a decent core to build around. The problem is that they need a huge upgrade on the wing to make it work. That is a difficult task considering our salary position but not impossible.
Sounds like wishful thinking. I really doubt CJ is on the block after just going off for 50 and while he is having a monster year in general. The Blazers need a long strong SF that can shoot. A solid 3&D player. Harkless should have been that player. At times he is that player. But obviously between him and Turner the Blazers have got to have at least one of them having a good game.I think Olshey understands what a mess we are in and is doing whatever possible to try to make the situation better. Whether that is possible, who knows? Also, I wouldn't assume that he isn't willing to trade CJ; the sentiments being leaked could be just to try to inflate his trade value.
I think Olshey understands what a mess we are in and is doing whatever possible to try to make the situation better. Whether that is possible, who knows? Also, I wouldn't assume that he isn't willing to trade CJ; the sentiments being leaked could be just to try to inflate his trade value.
I see it slightly differently. I agree with you about the entitlement mindset likely being a big hindrance to Harkless, but I don't see it as him thinking he's better than he is, so much as not realizing how good he could be if he just went out and took the role he wanted.Might be too late but maybe we should just give Harkless another shot. He’s quietly shooting over 38% from outside. He reminds me a little of Trob in that he thinks he’s a lot better than he actually is and deserves more, but if he just accepted his role he’d have a long career in the league.
They went to the WCF in 2015 (after winning 56 games), won 55 games last year before flaming out against the SAS buzzsaw. And they have a bonafide MVP candidate. Besides the fact that they still had the pieces needed to make a deal for CP in the first place, which we clearly do not.
Not seeing what you are.
Dame, CJ, Collins, and Nurk IS a decent core to build around. The problem is that they need a huge upgrade on the wing to make it work. That is a difficult task considering our salary position but not impossible.
I agree that we’re not that far off and have a nice core in place. We’re really only missing a 3&D wing. Problem is they’re not easy to find and a bunch of other teams are looking for one as well so Olshey has his work cut out
So, we need to hit, not a home run, but a fucking grand slam with one of our mid-first to mid-second round picks. We need to find the next Kawhi Leonard, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Jimmy Butler, Draymond Green outside of the draft lottery. The odds are long, but every couple years, a game changing star it taking outside of the lottery.
BNM
As mentioned, if a huge upgrade at the wing will make it work, then Dame, CJ and Nurk aren't that great to begin with.
No.41-41 last year is about as treadmill as it gets. The CP3 deal was a fire sale, unless you count Beverly, Williams (who they’re trying to move), a bunch of bench players, and a protected pick that’s looking like it’s going to be a late first rounder as fair value.
Didn't we make the playoffs every year from 77 to like 2004?
Dame isn't stupid. And I would humbly submit that getting rid of all the good players and draft picks to minimize the short-term impact of how bad you fucked up is probably not the best GM strategy to keep a waffling star, if he is a waffling star.Lets hope so. Let's also hope he doesn't ask out before then.
This is the absolute best hope, but there is a caveat. Kawhi came into his own in year 4. Giannis, year 3. Draymond, year 4. Butler, year 4. CJ, year 3. PG, year 3. By the time the dude we draft develops to a star or even a top level prospect to garner trade value, we might be nearing the end of Dame's prime (or his tenure in POR). You can say this same strategy/hope was applied in the Zach Collins pick. Realistically, where do we see Collins in year 3?
Re-live the horror: http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/evan-turner-becomes-a-blazer.302179/
Can't believe that sticker shock. Even I was trying to rationalize that in the end. smh.
