LT Sig

[BoLTz21]

You guys probably wont like either of these like the rest of my work but oh well, figure I can only get better by "Constructive Criticism".

A.

orB.

 

[MMoNeY24]

I like the first one better, but the pic looks stretched out sideways a little bit.

 

[SportsTicker]

like the 1st 1 but the font needs work and dont like bg

 

[BoLTz21]

Suggestions for bgs, textures? or sites for them anyone?

 

[JHair]

They are both identical except the bgs are a little diff. I don't like either of them--the pic seems too stretched out, and the text is really bad. All I can suggest is to use your eyes and choose some better stuff, and not to distort the main pic that much, he looks like a fat midget or something.I give this an E, failure with effort.

 

[deluxe]

not a bad concept for a sig, but like the others stated already looks kinda squashed, even the logo in the BG. good pic choices though.

 

[BoLTz21]

Thanks, I think everyone but rockandallstar gave me CONSTRUCTIVE Criticism. But I guess that's what you should come to expect from someone who dislikes you for no apparent reason, doesn't have a lick of gfx experience himself yet finds the time to reply to each and every sig posted with some A**hole remarks.Anyways, thanks guys for the POINTERS instead've just straightup telling me it sucks like SOMEONE.

 

[ortiz34]

The pics are a little stretched. And I don't think you need the noise effect in the bg for v1. Takes too much away from the pic. The text could use work, but you're learning, which is good.

 

[SickVick7]

I like version one better because you bring out LT in the b/g more. The only suggestion I have is change the text and you should get a solid 9/10 from me.

 

[His Greatness]

Uggh sorrytext looks bad and I dont know what that BG is. PIC looks too strecthed too.try using some filters for the background and messing around with it. Maybe some gradients and stuff too.