Manning: "I Want To Live As A Woman"

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BLAZER PROPHET

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,725
Likes
191
Points
63
Seriously, folks, you just can't make this stuff up...

http://www.kgw.com/news/Bradley-Manning-says-he-wants-to-live-as-a-woman-220658301.html

by Associated Press
kgw.com

Posted on August 22, 2013 at 6:35 AM

Updated today at 7:46 AM

FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) — Bradley Manning plans to live as a woman named Chelsea and wants to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible, the soldier said Thursday, a day after being sentenced to 35 years in prison for sending classified material to WikiLeaks.

Manning announced the decision in a written statement provided to NBC's "Today" show, asking supporters to refer to him by his new name and the feminine pronoun. The statement was signed "Chelsea E. Manning."

"As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Chelsea Manning. I am a female. Given the way that I feel, and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible," the statement read.

Manning's defense attorney David Coombs told "Today" in an interview that he is hoping officials at the military prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kan., will accommodate Manning's request for hormone therapy.

"If Fort Leavenworth does not, then I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure they are forced to do so," Coombs said.
Coombs did not respond to phone and email messages from The Associated Press on Thursday.

Manning's struggle with gender identity disorder — the sense of being a woman trapped in a man's body — was key to the defense.

Attorneys had presented evidence of Manning's struggle with gender identity, including a photo of the soldier in a blond wig and lipstick sent to a therapist.

Meanwhile, the fight to free Manning has taken a new turn, with Coombs and supporters saying they will ask the Army for leniency — and the White House for a pardon.

Even Manning's supporters have pivoted. During the sentencing hearing Wednesday, they wore T-shirts reading, "truth," as they had for the entire court-martial. Hours later, they had changed into shirts saying, "President Obama: Pardon Bradley Manning."

"The time to end Brad's suffering is now," Coombs told a news conference after Manning's sentence was handed down. "The time for our president to focus on protecting whistleblowers instead of punishing them is now."

The sentence was the stiffest punishment ever handed out in the U.S. for leaking information to the media. With good behavior and credit for the more than three years he has been held, Manning could be out in as little as seven years, Coombs said. Still, the lawyer decried the government's pursuit of Manning for what the soldier said was only an effort to expose wrongdoing and prompt debate of government policies among the American public.

The sentencing fired up the long-running debate over whether Manning was a whistleblower or a traitor for giving more than 700,000 classified military and diplomatic documents, plus battlefield footage, to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks. By volume alone, it was the biggest leak of classified material in U.S. history, bigger even than the Pentagon Papers a generation ago.

Manning was to return to the military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Coombs said, adding that he didn't know precisely when the soldier would leave Maryland. Coombs said he will file a request early next week that Obama pardon Manning or commute his sentence to time served.

Coombs read from a letter Manning will send to the president that read: "I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone."

Manning said the disclosure was done "out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others."

The White House said the request would be considered "like any other application." However, a pardon seems unlikely. Manning's case was part of an unprecedented string of prosecutions brought by the U.S. government in a crackdown on security breaches. The Obama administration has charged seven people with leaking to the media; only three people were prosecuted under all previous presidents combined.

Coombs also will work in coming weeks on a separate process in which he can seek leniency from the local area commander, who under military law must review — and could reduce — Manning's convictions and sentence.

Manning, an Army intelligence analyst from Crescent, Okla., digitally copied and released Iraq and Afghanistan battlefield reports and State Department cables while working in 2010 in Iraq. Manning also leaked video of a 2007 Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that mistakenly killed at least nine people, including a Reuters photographer.

Manning said the motive was exposing the U.S. military's "bloodlust" and generate debate over the wars and U.S. policy. The government alleged Manning was a traitor who betrayed his oath as a soldier in order to gain notoriety.

Manning was found guilty last month of 20 crimes, including six violations of the Espionage Act, but was acquitted of the most serious charge, aiding the enemy, which carried a potential sentence of life in prison without parole.

Whistleblower advocates said the punishment was unprecedented in its severity. Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists said "no other leak case comes close."

Daniel Ellsberg, the former defense analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers in 1971, on Wednesday called Manning "one more casualty of a horrible, wrongful war that he tried to shorten." Ellsberg also was charged under the Espionage Act, but the case was thrown out because of government misconduct, including a White House-sanctioned break-in at the office of Ellsberg's psychiatrist.

Others disagreed.

Gabriel Schoenfeld, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute think tank and author of the book "Necessary Secrets," welcomed Manning's punishment.

"The sentence is a tragedy for Bradley Manning, but it is one he brought upon himself," he said. "It will certainly serve to bolster deterrence against other potential leakers."

But he also warned that the sentence will ensure that Edward Snowden — the National Security Agency leaker who was charged with espionage in a potentially more explosive case while Manning's court-martial was underway — "will do his best never to return to the United States and face a trial and stiff sentence."

Coombs said that he was in tears after the sentencing and that Manning comforted him by saying: "Don't worry about it. It's all right. I know you did your best. ... I'm going to be OK. I'm going to get through this."
 
I've always stated that Manning leaked the documents out of revenge against anti-gay policies or hazing he received in the military, not any kind of moral duty to expose secrets.
 
The real problem with what Bradley Manning did was that he was given access to this kind of information in the first place.
 
"The time to end Brad's suffering is now."

They should have shot the traitor.

Also, isn't she "Chelsea" now, counselor?

Ed O.
 
I can't help but wonder if this isn't a ploy by the defense attorney to obtain a pardon, keep him from the general prison population (where he'd be one popular bitch) or get him transferred to a woman's prison.
 
typical woman, airing our dirty laundry for the whole world to see

we will talk about this later
 
i heard that huffington post is referring to it as a "she" even though no hormone therapy or anything else. I guess just because you say you are, you are.

I am a African American Pans/Demi Female. :MARIS61:

as the lowest member of the "Privilege Hierarchy", I must have that define my being in every aspect of my life.
 
Last edited:
If they cut all his junk off and slap a cun.t on him then I will approve him being transferred to a womans prison.

only if his cell mate is a xover chick with a massive dick..other wise he needs to do some research on what it feels like to be a dick holder
 
wow you are one of the first to get priggish, as this shows, and by the by...he is a he till parts have been removed, no matter how PC you like to act
He's still a he, no matter how he chooses to mutilate himself.
 
This should be filed under "who gives a fuck" sub-section "why should I give a fuck"
 
I really could give two shits about Bradley Manning's choice to cut his dick off and live as a woman and I see it as utterly immaterial in the larger debate about secrecy, whistle-blowing and the rights of citizens in a democratic republic to know certain things about what is being done in their name.

I don't know why, but I am suddenly reminded of this famous exchange that took place during Hermann Goering's detention at the Nuremberg trials

Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.
Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.
Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

I'm not saying Manning didn't break the law and breaking the law probably must be punished, but to call him traitorous? I ask, if we the people really are the ultimate authority and the source of power in this system of government and the people that we have chosen as representatives do things in our name and commit atrocities and then cover it up under the guise of "protecting us from the terrorists," isn't that something we should probably know about if we are going to make informed decisions about the direction this country is going?

I'm not so naive to think that countries don't have secrets (and need some level of secrecy) but is the amount of material we call "classified" these days healthy for a functioning democratic republic? Is this state of "eternal war" that we entered 12 years ago likely to preserve our democracy or tear it apart as we become more and more authoritarian and fearful?

Just some food for thought.
 
Last edited:
Looks a bit like Tanya Harding. I wonder if she likes it rough?

images
 
if they dont have anything to hide they shouldnt worry about it, we are just trying to catch criminals

works both ways, no?
 
if they dont have anything to hide they shouldnt worry about it, we are just trying to catch criminals

works both ways, no?

I'm talking about the government hiding things, not citizens ... or maybe you weren't responding to my "musings?"
 
my point is that it works both ways

if the government has nothing to hide, they shouldnt worry about it, we are just trying to catch criminals in the government

not so cut and dry obviously but it rings true
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top