I kind of like that. But where does Diaw play on your roster? He could play 3, 4 or 5 IMO. I like this a lot. But Nate would HAVE to let them run. I don't really want to give up Bayless. Maybe throw in pics instead?
umm, I accidently put Frye in there instead of Diaw, Diaw would back up 3 and 4 still getting 30 mpg. He is good in the transition but Diaw is also a great half-court player with extremely good passing skills for a bigger guy. Seeing Sergio/Rudy/Batum/Diaw/Pryzbilla in at the same time would be a thing of beauty. He's criticized for being underselfish and he has a big contract, but on Portland both would be fine (if we had Nash). The contract might get old his last two years but we've taken bad contracts before to get what we want (See Raef).
As far Nate letting them run, he's been pushing them to do so more lately, they just have no idea how to (other than Sergio, Rudy, Batum and Martell). He hasn't drilled them on lanes to run whatsoever, with Nash that'd have to be a focus, at least in part.
Here's a quote from Nate after our last game against the suns: "He is still orchestrating that offense, getting everyone involved and knowing the situations," Portland coach Nate McMillan said. "He is probably as good as I have seen as far as knowing were to go with the ball and what to do."
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2008/11/24/20081124spt-suns.html
lt sounds like he'd trust him.
I think this is truly a championship contendor this year, and a championship favorite next year.
Nash/Sergio/Koponen
Roy/Fernandez/(2nd rounder or vet)
Webster/Diaw/Batum
Aldridge/Diaw/(2nd rounder or vet)
Oden/Pryzbilla/Freeland
(imagine Nash on our team now with Aldridge out of his slump, Roy learning to get easy buckets backdoor, and Oden with a year of experience)