OT Mavs sexual harrassment scandal?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

and another trial by media starts.

the only actually proof of anything in that article is that he lied about his history, which is worthy of termination for sure, but holy shit id love for one of these accusations to be accompanied with some proof . in the current climate, just saying anything is enough for everyone to skew to their side. aint trying to defend anyone doing anything wrong, but its all fucked up these days - lawful justice needs to prevail. but for news orgs, printing anything like this these days is traction, so they fish where the fishes are.
 
I believe the phrase you're after is "FAKE NEWS!"

eh thats an american thing, who knows if its fake, but at least qualify the story with both sides and attempt some unbiased journalistic integrity rather than just hyping up the OMG angle.

still, considering the state of things, siding with the loudest sectors is easier than playing the middle.
 
eh thats an american thing, who knows if its fake, but at least qualify the story with both sides and attempt some unbiased journalistic integrity rather than just hyping up the OMG angle.

still, considering the state of things, siding with the loudest sectors is easier than playing the middle.

To be fair to SI - they do reach out to the party that is being accused - if they decline to comment... that does say something, doesn't it? You can't make people talk.
 
and another trial by media starts.

the only actually proof of anything in that article is that he lied about his history, which is worthy of termination for sure, but holy shit id love for one of these accusations to be accompanied with some proof . in the current climate, just saying anything is enough for everyone to skew to their side. aint trying to defend anyone doing anything wrong, but its all fucked up these days - lawful justice needs to prevail. but for news orgs, printing anything like this these days is traction, so they fish where the fishes are.
Pics or it didn't happen!
 
You haven't met Igor the torture master...neither have I but....you can make people talk
dont-even-think-of-escape.jpg
 
To be fair to SI - they do reach out to the party that is being accused - if they decline to comment... that does say something, doesn't it? You can't make people talk.

isnt first thing a lawyer tells you, dont say anything?
and isnt it a right to not talk? or are we now inferring using rights is 'saying something'?

aint even my country, but i wouldnt be saying jackshit without talkin to someone.
 
isnt first thing a lawyer tells you, dont say anything?
and isnt it a right to not talk? or are we now inferring using rights is 'saying something'?

aint even my country, but i wouldnt be saying jackshit without talkin to someone.

How do you know they DID talk to someone?

See how this goes? I'm dizzy from the merry-go-round.
 
How do you know they DID talk to someone?

See how this goes? I'm dizzy from the merry-go-round.

im not sure where i said they did (im assuming were talking about the accused and a lawyer?) or are you talking about SI? tbh i dunno, all im saying is if the accused said nothing, that doesnt 'say something'. unless its inferred/impressed/some other word for 'seems like maybe possibly could' which isnt exactly sound judicial practice.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top