McCain's concession speech

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

MARIS61

Real American
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
28,007
Likes
5,012
Points
113
What is he waiting for? It's all over but the shouting and pouting.

I think he should show some class for a change and just concede right now.
 
What is he waiting for? It's all over but the shouting and pouting.

I think he should show some class for a change and just concede right now.
Why even hold the election? Let's just call the whole thing off and declare Obama our King and Savior right now. Who needs a silly little election to decide the next president of the United States???

Moron.
 
Why even hold the election? Let's just call the whole thing off and declare Obama our King and Savior right now. Who needs a silly little election to decide the next president of the United States???

Moron.

King Obama will save us! Funny how Obama is just becoming Mao like.

MaoTseTungZedong.JPG



Why not we just don't let republicans vote in the election. That would satisfy the libs.
 
Why not we just don't let republicans vote in the election. That would satisfy the libs.

We'd prefer all Republicans simply be jailed. That would satisfy us.
 
Of course it would. Liberals are not about free speech, they're about stifling any dissent.

Dissent is inconvenient. I'm glad you agree.

Xericx said:
Nope. Theft. i guess if you live in a socialist state, I guess it remains property of the proletariat, eh comrade?

Yes, so you've nicely contradicted yourself. First you called it theft, then you agreed it wasn't. Your second thought was correct.
 
Nope. Refers to your statement.

Theft. refers to "it is theft".

the third comment was me being facetious.
 
the third comment was me being facetious.

No, none of us are being facetious. You understand that your money will be liberated from you and you will be jailed.
 
That's what happens when you "think"? Pretty scary.

Well isn't it. God/Jesus are in charge of everything. You don't have to work for anything, and everything that you need is allocated you to God/Jesus (the dictator).

It seems like the Christians would like Communism.
 
Well isn't it. God/Jesus are in charge of everything. You don't have to work for anything, and everything that you need is allocated you to God/Jesus (the dictator).
Better stop "thinking" and go lie down somewhere. You're not making any sense.
 
So you believe Heaven is a capitalist state with democratically elected officials? I am going to run against Jesus for head of Heaven.
What you're missing is the fact that heaven is heaven--and not this earth! EVERYTHING will be different in heaven, and any notion of "government" that we have down here will be rendered obsolete. And by the way, if you think a loving God will operate the same way a dictator does, well . . . I don't know what to say to you.
 
What you're missing is the fact that heaven is heaven--and not this earth! EVERYTHING will be different in heaven, and any notion of "government" that we have down here will be rendered obsolete. And by the way, if you think a loving God will operate the same way a dictator does, well . . . I don't know what to say to you.

But what kind of loving God allows for people to kill each other like constantly happens on Earth? What loving God would allow the forbidding of gay couples who love each other to be together?
 
Well isn't it. God/Jesus are in charge of everything. You don't have to work for anything, and everything that you need is allocated you to God/Jesus (the dictator).

It seems like the Christians would like Communism.

Christian communists trace the origins of their practice to the New Testament book Acts of the Apostles at chapter 2 and verses 42, 44, and 45:

42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and in fellowship [...] 44 And all that believed were together, and had all things in common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. (King James Version)

The theme is reiterated in Acts 4:32-37:

32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. 36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, 37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet. (King James Version)

Wikipedia Link
 
But what kind of loving God allows for people to kill each other like constantly happens on Earth?
So God is supposed to prevent anything bad from happening to us? I suppose that means he should prevent car accidents, and natural disasters, and house fires, and all kinds of diseases? We should never fall and break a bone, never have a disappointing relationship, never get fired from our jobs, never go through a divorce??

God is supposed to prevent all of that? Is that what you're saying?

We live in a fallen, sinful world, and bad things happen to us down here. That's why heaven is a much better place, and why we should all be striving to get there.
 
But what kind of loving God allows for people to kill each other like constantly happens on Earth? What loving God would allow the forbidding of gay couples who love each other to be together?

Free Will.

You get that with "god" but you don't with a Democratic Party state.
 
What is he waiting for? It's all over but the shouting and pouting.

I think he should show some class for a change and just concede right now.

Why? Can you recall any other presidential candidate who has conceded before the election?
 
the question for me is how far the republican tactics will backfire. Will there be backlash against the republican congressional candidates? Will this be a one-election blip, or will there be a residual effect in 2012 (I suspect it will hinge on what happens over the past four years, but I wouldn't be surprised if there is some lingering distrust after this horrible campaign)?

Regardless of what you believe, it is hard to find many accomplishments over the past eight years. Perhaps it is time for change. The conservative republicans here seem a bit fearful of that change, what it will bring, what will happen. Isn't it time to try something new? If what Obama is selling doesn't work, then in four years there will be another change--that is, if the republicans haven't burned too many bridges over the past three months to carry over that long.

What we're seeing now is the republican party frantically, desperately trying to keep their grip on power. They've been in the WH for roughly 28 of the last 40 years, and 20 of the last 28. Their campaign has nothing to do with issues; it has degraded into mud-slinging and name-calling. I think that they could be inadvertently torpedoing the chances of the down-ticket candidates as well due to their ridiculous, ineffective tactics.

The republicans have to stop thinking of the wh as their birthright. This fear-mongering is too much for me. If Obama is elected, and the fate of the country does not improve, I will be disappointed--but the current path is clearly not working, and McCain is clearly not an agent of change.

Obama is getting the support of most of the undecideds and independents. It is not just because of this so-called "class warfare" tactic. It certainly hasn't worked before, so taht can't be the reason. People are sick and ready for change. It startles me that so many of you are so much in fear of this happening.
 
So God is supposed to prevent anything bad from happening to us? I suppose that means he should prevent car accidents, and natural disasters, and house fires, and all kinds of diseases? We should never fall and break a bone, never have a disappointing relationship, never get fired from our jobs, never go through a divorce??

God is supposed to prevent all of that? Is that what you're saying?

We live in a fallen, sinful world, and bad things happen to us down here. That's why heaven is a much better place, and why we should all be striving to get there.

Well I'm not talking about our God. I'm talking about a loving God.
 
We live in a fallen, sinful world, and bad things happen to us down here. That's why heaven is a much better place, and why we should all be striving to get there.



if heaven is ruled by the sadistic genocidal megalomaniac described in the bible i wouldn't be so sure it's going to be a better place.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top