Michael Redd

[pegs]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Jun 11 2008, 06:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jun 11 2008, 05:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Miller's the better shooter, playmaker, rebounder, has height (mismatch/small ball!), is smarter, and is a better defender (that's not saying much at all about Redd).

Basically, Miller's the better all-around player, and I'd take him over Redd any day.</div>
This has delved into a conversation that isn't even relevant to the topic. Miller isn't available and due to Memphis' cap situation I doubt he will be.
</div>

Okay, then I wouldn't take Redd because he's just as bad, or just a little better than RJ. His defense is worse, and his contract sucks.

I'm all for Bell. Or Sessions. Villanueva, maybe. Bogut, definitely.

 

[Astral]

... Why would we take Redd if we have VC?

 

[Netted]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jun 11 2008, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>... Why would we take Redd if we have VC?</div>
To move VC to SF, improve our shooting and spread the floor more.